Rank: Forum user
|
I have turned up to train staff on how to make a pallet load safe as we keep having loads falling off of the tail lifts.
The management team in the warehouse side have told me I cant train them from the safe system of work as they cant do it like that as the pick lists dont allow them to .
So, no training taking place
I am stunned!
|
|
|
|
Rank:: Super forum user
|
Get them to show you how they actually do it. Risk assess it. If it's not safe then recommend changes. If it is safe then rewrite the SSoW. At least your day isn't wasted then!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Their way is very unsafe and has loads leaing and collpasing. You should not stack lead acid batteries more than 3 high. States everywhere I have looked. Id put pictures on here if I could lol
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
plus everytime I came up with a solution they put up another wall. Im trying to take ownership of the problem but all they are doing is pointing finger at each other.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
And for future training, put a pack together for management so that when the next round of refresher training or new employee induction training is required, line management train employees in the new safe method of pallet stability.
Sounds like you may have to investigate solutions with warehouse operations, pick list sequencing can be changed if required and you've got a solid argument for this.
What's the issue?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
No ssow, no training, loads falling off vehicles and you know about it. Look after number one first, I know what I would do.
|
|
|
|
Rank:: Super forum user
|
For your own protection you need to document this and raise it with more senior management. Then you may wish to consider your employment options...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
lisar wrote:plus everytime I came up with a solution they put up another wall. Im trying to take ownership of the problem but all they are doing is pointing finger at each other. I'd take a different stance and put the onus on line management to take responsibility. They are planning and managing work activity, they are creating the risk and they need to manage it. You are there to advise them how to do it, not to do it for them. I personally wouldn't undertake the training of operatives myself, I'd be looking at every possible way to gain buy in from the relevant director and then line management themselves and in turn training line management to do the assessing and training. You would then audit and be a point of contact for advice. It's not easy, but the trouble with taking ownership yourself is that responsibility for H&S gets chucked back at you and line management don't feel the need to take it seriously! Maybe not 100% applicable, but the direction you're coming from may be part of the problem (again I have no idea of your company structure). You can even go the length of speaking with HR or the relevant person and putting a case for introducing leading KPIs into line management performance review (i.e. % employees trainer, % risk assessment actions closed out etc.). This may then get to the route of the problem and get line management listening to you.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Paul B wrote:What is a pick list ?? It's a bit like a shopping list but listed in order of progression around the warehouse so you don't have to keep doubling back on yourself. If the warehouse has been well designed the heavier/bulkier items will always be picked first so that they are at the bottom of the pallet/trolley/roll cage/etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
lisar, I'm with Jake on this matter.
Normally I won't proceed with any training until managers and supervisors are aware of it and in agreement with the purpose and content of the training.
Get them on your side and you'll avoid the problems that you are having.
Think of the purpose of the training - avoid loads falling off tail-lifts. As well as the unsafe aspect, their may be a commercial aspect too - falling loads may get damaged, products to replace, packing to replace, waste of production time etc.
If that's the case then a new procedure is justified. So get the supervisors and managers involved in the problem-solving, make them think they are driving force on this matter.
They'll even get browny points if the problem is solved. Your input is to ensure the new procedure will be safer - no browny points for you but at least you'll have more purpose and more fun during the training.
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
They wanted me to write all SSOW , Risk assesments and do all training. I dont normally deal with employees just safety reps and so to be this involved is not the norm.
They also were asked to help with the training lots of times as the issue has been on going for months and were informed of the training. Any thing I ask them to do generally doesnt get done or gets done slowly.
I have lots of emails flitting about with the words "someone is going to get badly injured soon"
It seems like they want me to do all the hard graft etc but dont want me sticking my nose in
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Do the managers agree the current practice is unsafe and therefore needs to change. Or Do they think it is unsafe but work must go on. Or do they think that the current practice is safe ?
I can't help feel your next step depends on the answers to the above. If they feel it is currently safe first you need to convince them it is not, if indeed it is not.
I agree with a lot of the other posts generally and possibly needing to cover yourself. However you also can't go running to senior management every time either.
If they agree it is unsafe and something should be done why not arrange another meeting with them (and possibly a picker or whatever they are called) where each of you will be expected to bring some solutions to the table for discussion). That way they also have to bring a solution and not just shoot yours down.
Identify their real problem, safer = more time = less work done ? so come at it from their point of view. Be radical - different pallet for the batteries allowing loading at ground level and lifting into place ( this can be done without the vehicle present - Plus point).
You need a win win solution if you can, otherwise have a solution that will work but may require capital outlay and a solution that works but takes more time - let them pick.
Or acceptance from high up the food chain any resulting accidents from current method is acceptable to the company.
Nice to have a good problem to get your teeth into!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
They are aware that its unsafe but nobody is taking responsibility. Also anyone that agrees with me then tends to disagree once in the group that disagree which are management level so seems mental.
I just felt very attacked this morning when I got here.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There is one more issue here, the pallets / cages falling off the tail-lifts.
They appear not to have lift guards attached to the tail-lift, to stop the load sliding / rolling off.
Sounds a bit like a national company I worked at several years ago.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.