Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
amylang85  
#1 Posted : 23 January 2013 14:14:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
amylang85

Hello, I'm looking for a bit of advice regarding the use of e-stops in food manufacturing. We have large fryers that are used as part of a production line to cook pasta based products. With the current system we have inherited the situation is that if an e-stop is hit on the production line in which the fryers are located all the machines stop outright. This includes the fryer which stops operating and continues to hold the product that is cooking in it. We have concerns that this may be more of a fire risk as the product is hot and remains cooking in hot oil whilst stuck in the machinery. My understanding of the PUWER Regs is that although the e stops should rapidly bring work equipment to a halt, this must be achieved under control so as not to create any additional hazards which the trapped product will. We want to query if we can bring this hazardous equipment to a controlled stop rather than an abrupt halt, and ideally is it good practice to put in e-stops that will stop individual pieces of equipment rather than stop the whole production line?
paul.skyrme  
#2 Posted : 26 January 2013 19:27:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

amylang85, This is not quite as straight forward as you may think, however, my reasoning is along the same lines as yours. However, it could be necessary to stop the whole line, though it also could be argued that whilst some equipment can stop instantly, other equipment should come to a controlled stop. I have worked on many production lines where stops control individual machines. Is the completed line a single machine? It can get complex, though there are people who can help to advise you.
DaveDaniel  
#3 Posted : 28 January 2013 17:46:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DaveDaniel

Having worked in the Motor Industry for many years, I can think of many examples where dead stop could not have been safely achieved rapidly. You can't for example safely cut power to a foundry hot blast cupola - doing this creates another emergency requiring you to knock the bottom out of the cupola before the contents solidifies and writes off the foundry. Our foundry had to do it once when an employee tried to steal copper from site by sawing through the 11Kv supply..... (He survived!) Similarly, if you drop the power on a 100 station in-line transfer machining system, you'll smash up 100 heads and tooling, unless there's a retract operation as part of the run-down process. The ACOP on woodworking machines accepts that a 10 second run-down time is acceptable and I've heard of a big sawmill where the saw had 5 ton flywheels and blacked out the village if you started it up too quick - No chance of a 10 second run-down time there! The aim is to bring the line to a safe condition without creating more risks. If you put individual E-stops on parts of the line, will this work and not create further problems? Presumably there is some kind of controller running the line which needs to have a more sophisticated response. Dave
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.