Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
elburt  
#1 Posted : 04 February 2013 16:22:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
elburt

Notifiable project, construction plan included demolition, deconstruction and refurbishment of buildings on site. PC had not appointed a demo contractor at the initial stage and appointed one approx 3 weeks into the project. CDMC reviewed H&S file information but demo paperwork was not part of that (obviously).
Question? Is the CDMC responsible for ensuring the demolition plan information is suitable or because it has not been submitted as part of the construction phase plan is it not within their role?
thanks Elburt
boblewis  
#2 Posted : 04 February 2013 19:10:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Once the PC is on site it becomes his responsibility to manage H&S so I woulld leave it with him.

Bob
bob youel  
#3 Posted : 05 February 2013 07:18:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

The CDMC should have kept the client notified at all stages and if the demo plan was a criticable part of the early stages of the work they should have made a comment to the client about the suitability of the demo systems of work at that stage. If the demo comes later on in the works the PC should still have a demo plan in place and the CDMC should still evaluate it. And we must note that the act of demolition does not always come at the begining of a project

As BL has noted the PC is the site manager and if there are problems the client should take it up with the PC and possibly thereafter CDMC

what is your role?
smith6720  
#4 Posted : 05 February 2013 08:23:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smith6720

why should the CDMC evaluate the demo plan?

PC was in place, CHSP was approved, which mentioned demolition work, PC then appointed a CDM approved demo contractor from their list, demo contractor sends his method statement in to PC for approval, work commences. Where does it say that CDMC has to evaluate/approve method statements/plan of work??

juist my thoughts!!
elburt  
#5 Posted : 05 February 2013 09:45:43(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
elburt

I am the health and safety adviser for the client.
we have a project management company that provide the cdmc role for our projects.
The demo wasn't part of enabling works, it is a big part of the project in 2 stages. I agree that it is the PC role to look at the method statement in detail, but I would have thought that the CDMC would look at the demo plan to ensure that; as it should have been part of the initial construction information, that it is sufficiently developed and advise the client that there is sufficient detail for the job to commence?
E
Stedman  
#6 Posted : 05 February 2013 11:14:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Stedman

elburt wrote:
I am the health and safety adviser for the client.
we have a project management company that provide the cdmc role for our projects.
The demo wasn't part of enabling works, it is a big part of the project in 2 stages. I agree that it is the PC role to look at the method statement in detail, but I would have thought that the CDMC would look at the demo plan to ensure that; as it should have been part of the initial construction information, that it is sufficiently developed and advise the client that there is sufficient detail for the job to commence?
E


Elburt,

Unfortunately as a CDM-C practitioner, one of the most frustrating things I find are the assumptions and myths surrounding our role. If you are acting as a safety advisor for the client and in order to avoid an potential conflict, it is essential that you know exactly what the scope of the CDM-C role is and the only reliable place for this information is the Approved Code of Practice for the 2007 CDM Regulations.
boblewis  
#7 Posted : 05 February 2013 11:17:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

The client has clearly recognised that the demolition will be post site start and as such should not ask for detailed demolition information post contract start. Sufficient was posted in the CPP and accepted by the CDMC. If you had wanted to see and verify the final demolition methods then this should have been placed within the contract and the client rules for the work. Failure to have done does open the way for the PC to make cost claims for additional work and management should you now insist. Your CDMC should have advised you on this. The CDMC role now is really about design co-ordination and creation of the H&S File

Put a note against this project manager just in case you should ever need another - you will remember then who to avoid if you had made this need about the demolition clear to them.

Bob
BJC  
#8 Posted : 05 February 2013 11:33:07(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

I concentrate on competency as appraising RA/MS places one in an awkward situation and perhaps open to FFI.
bob youel  
#9 Posted : 05 February 2013 14:54:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

The CDMC has the duty to ensure that adequate arrangements are in place for managing the project and this includes evaluating [not approving!] all managing arrangements for the work inclusive of the evaluation of demolition plans and noting that management systems are live throughout a project the managing arrangements should be regularly reviewed as a project proceeds to ensure that they remain adequate

CDM does not say that a CDMC has to evaluate/approve method statements/plan of work . However the question of how deep one goes into an evaluation is still open to debate but the least that should be done is an evaluation of all management systems that are in place/likely to be in place

The one big problem that many CDMC's AND H&S advisers have [along with the other parties involved] is that they may not be competent with regards to the creation and operation of management systems; a large hole in the CDM regs that was never bottomed nor will be bottomed


Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.