Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi everyone
Although I complete COSHH assessment form for some adhesive we use has anyone got a sample COSHH risk assessment form I can adapt to go with the assessment
Thanks in advance
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hello Alan,
I haven't been an IOSH member for very long (first post) and I have been working in the H&S scene for only 8 months. It's Long and complicated story but I have found my calling. I was given a COSHH template from a very helpful chap who was undertaking an air/dust/fume monitoring survey of our site. I have modified it slightly to suit our needs and there is no reason why you wouldn't be able to do the same. I am happy to pass this onto you via email as an attachment if you would like to PM me your address.
Kind regards
Pete W
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sorry Alan - bit confused by your post! You already complete COSHH risk assessments but you want a sample form to go with the assessment you have already done??
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi all,
I am in a state of confusion regarding COSHH. I am trying to understand the story behind the TWA OEL and STEL. The book explains it in a way that really confuses me. I would like to know about this for obvious reasons can some one explain to me how it works, how long can someone use a paint that has been set at the STEL? can they use it, have a break then use it again (if so what is the break length)
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I have to complete a COSHH assessment and then ensure any hazards I have found I write into a risk assessment adding the control measures
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The STEL is a limit for the concentration of the substance in the air.
The way concentration is typically measured is by pumping the air through a collector which collects the substance. Then the amount of substance collected is measured and the concentration is calculated.
This means the concentration isn't measured at an instant but is an average over (say) 15 minutes.
If you were to measure the concentration in this way, and find it was greater than the STEL, you would have exceeded the limit.
You can't know how the exposure compares with the exposure limit unless you know what the concentration in the air is.
Time-weighted averaging means that if the concentration is different at different times, you can average the different concentrations together according to how long each went on for. If you have a break away from the substance, then there is no contribution to the time-weighted exposure during the break time. But it doesn't matter when in the day the breaks are taken (they could all be at the end together and it would make no difference), just how much time you are exposed to how much of the substance during the period you are time-averaging over.
EH40 is the authoritative book on this - is that what you've got?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Alan. I am still confused by what you are asking / saying. It appears that you may be trying to duplicate something unnecessarily. This may be your organisational system, you may be unable to influence the output.
However, this is the theory:
The COSHH regulations require that harmful agents / chemicals are controlled, and that risks are assessed. The significant findings must be recorded, and (clear) information provided to those using or producing said substances.
If the process or activity is also being generally 'assessed' (under the Mgt regs) which includes any specific risk areas - COSHH, MHO, lead - there is no need to replicate or overlap assessments; chose one and stick to it.
Back to COSHH: Some organisations manage to make this really complicated. Refer to any hazard data sheets or other information about substances, consider how the work activity creates exposure and how this is to be controlled. Many people use their own specific form to record this 'translation' from hazard to risk. Often, this form is then given to employees, although I avoid this, as it is not usually a 'clear' communication method.
Maybe it is this part - the safety information for employees - which is being asked to be transferred from one record (COSHH) to another (general risk) assessment information? Is this your situation?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
sadlass
In answer to the last part of your question is yes this is exactly what I am after
I have completed COSHH assessments but need to transfer to the general risk assessment as information for employees, it was the latter form I had not got
Thanks
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
My first thought was the COSHH assessment should be task specific. But thinking about it you may COSHH assess using adhesive to say put a sign up, but then also need to do this while working at height sometimes. ( So the COSHH activity become an element of a larger task)
So all you need to do is list on the general risk assessment the adhesive as the hazard and then either just reference the COSHH assessment or retype the list of controls that the COSHH assessment requires onto the general risk assessment.
The problem with the latter is that if you retype the controls from the COSHH assessment to the General risk assessment and then someone updates the COSHH, but not the general. You need to think how you will control this.
Or have I misread your issue?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.