Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
fiesta  
#1 Posted : 01 March 2013 15:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fiesta

What are peoples thoughts as to whether a Hot Work Permit should be in place when these are used. Personally I think yes, but we're having a debate. Opinions welcomed Andy
smitch  
#2 Posted : 01 March 2013 16:31:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

If it’s your site or sites, then it’s your rules mate; Suppose it all boils down to……………………………………wait for it.....................................wait for it…………………………………………………………………….........yup you know it coming………….........Risk Assessment ;-) On a more serious/helpful note, then I work in a manufacturing environment and have in the past had cause to use such a heater (due to normal heating system failure); and we did so under such a permit (as it was not for us a routing occurrence). So if you are using them daily for long periods (weeks/months) then a hot work permit might not work as well as desired (in my opinion work permits should not be used for normal daily activities, as they can otherwise loosing there effectiveness /end up being ignored).
smitch  
#3 Posted : 01 March 2013 16:34:50(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

oops!!!! ..............(as it was not for us a routing occurrence). Should have read.......(as it was not for us a routine occurrence).
Clairel  
#4 Posted : 01 March 2013 19:24:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

A hot work permit for using a propane heater? You're kidding right?? I thought it was March the 1st today not April 1st.
smitch  
#5 Posted : 01 March 2013 21:02:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

Clairel Not sure if your comment was aimed at me; but unless you are aware of the circumstances (ie area, materials present, layout etc etc), then how can you be sure that a permit for use of this temporary arrangement was not necessary or the best way of controlling the use of the risk?
smitch  
#6 Posted : 01 March 2013 23:18:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

Sorry, should have read......."or the best way of controlling the use of the temporary heater".
JJ Prendergast  
#7 Posted : 02 March 2013 11:14:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

Agree with Clairel I think you totally mis-understand the use and purpose of Permits to Work
boblewis  
#8 Posted : 02 March 2013 12:33:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

If anything a Confined Space permit is more apposite. Seriously these heaters can be the cause of fatalities if the cabins are not ventilated sufficiently and many site cabins on a cold rainy day are not!!! Bob
smitch  
#9 Posted : 02 March 2013 14:18:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

JJ Prendergast wrote:
Agree with Clairel I think you totally mis-understand the use and purpose of Permits to Work
JJ In your opinion (and undoubtedly that of others as well) that might well be the case. But in the company and circumstances where I used the permit, the temporarily increased risk was managed, so I may have used the wrong tool but achieved the right result. IMHO that's good enough for me. Have a good weekend.
firesafety101  
#10 Posted : 02 March 2013 17:07:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

May I suggest that if you are not aware of the hazards associated with LPG heaters on construction sites then you will have a blasé attitude toward them. I have seen them explode in a fire situation, they take off like missiles and land where the heck they like, they can slice off an arm, (I've seen the result of that myself), and they can produce a flame thrower style effect that can reach many metres away. The misuse I have seen ranges from using the heater to dry fresh plaster and mortar, with the heater place in amongst timber and other combustibles and also too close for comfort to flammables. I even once witnessed a female worker in a factory walk past such a heater and the plastic carrier bag she was carrying just vaporised with the contents falling to the floor. Whether or not you decide to issue a Hot work permit or not there should at least be a risk assessment, and fire risk assessment for the use of such equipment.
messyshaw  
#11 Posted : 02 March 2013 19:02:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

Firesafety101 wrote:
Whether or not you decide to issue a Hot work permit or not there should at least be a risk assessment, and fire risk assessment for the use of such equipment.
I am afraid I agree with Clairel that a HWP is not the way to go. Partly reviewing the premises fire risk assessment may well give the adequate solutions and may be more relevant in the case of this change tan issuing a HWP (or daily HWPs)
johnmurray  
#12 Posted : 03 March 2013 13:39:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

startinm  
#13 Posted : 03 March 2013 17:39:22(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
startinm

One concern that my company has is that these types of heaters (or any with a naked flame) are prohibited by the building insurers and therefore we cannot allow any use within buildings. I would urge all to ascertain the conditions of use with respect property insurance before any consideration of use or issue of Permits.
Clairel  
#14 Posted : 04 March 2013 09:21:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

No one disputes that propane heater can be dangerous - from both a fire and carbon monoxide issue - but a PTW is not the way to control their use and IMO shows a lack of understanding of what a PTW is for.
boblewis  
#15 Posted : 04 March 2013 11:07:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Claire Precisely:-) What ideas some have!!!!
Mr.Flibble  
#16 Posted : 04 March 2013 12:54:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Mr.Flibble

They had an Idea of controlling something which is potentially dangerous, by using a document which ensures that the adequate controls are in place before usage is allowed. May not be the right document for the job, but at least it shows that they thought about the risks. I would rather see some control than no control. So IMO not a bad idea
firesafety101  
#17 Posted : 04 March 2013 14:29:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

JohnMurray wrote:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/contractors-ordered-pay-out-21-1348801
The blaze led to a legal battle where a top judge ruled Central Roofing liable to pay Mueller a total of £21,357,889. The high cost of low standard control. Surely a hot work permit, and issued daily would be the answer? A single sheet of paper against ? What does anyone else recommend? I believe it is folly not to consider LPG heaters as high fire risk, the cylinders themselves are subjected to strict controls due to propane being a highly flammable liquid and should be risk assessed in accordance with DSEAR. http://www.hse.gov.uk/fireandexplosion/about.htm Gases Gases, such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or methane, which are usually stored under pressure in cylinders and bulk containers. Uncontrolled releases can readily ignite or cause the cylinder to become a missile. Find out more: DSEAR Guidance Liquefied Petroleum Gas Guidance ATEX in Electrical Safety
JJ Prendergast  
#18 Posted : 04 March 2013 14:47:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

Firesafety I don't think anybody would disagree with what you say - but as Clairel and I have both indicated, the use of a PtW in this case is not the way to control the risk. See HSG250, if I remember correctly A 'mini' fire risk assessment would probably have been sufficient paperwork, from the information we have.
firesafety101  
#19 Posted : 04 March 2013 14:52:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I would think a mini fra would look rather like a HWP just depending on the title at the top of the page? Don't forget a fire risk assessment must be reviewed every time something changes, like for instance the location of the heater and cylinder.
boblewis  
#20 Posted : 04 March 2013 21:13:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

The HSE view is clear here http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/cis59.pdf Lets forget about permits and FRAs you really ought to be thinking this through. Purpose built cabin designed for gas heating with the cylinder external and fixed pipework. Without this you really are close to the wind. Bob
firesafety101  
#21 Posted : 04 March 2013 22:37:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Bob I may have misunderstood the initial question, I'm talking about propane heaters used on site to warm the workplace and dry plaster, mortar etc. not in a welfare cabin?
Graham Bullough  
#22 Posted : 05 March 2013 13:11:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

fiesta - By site heaters do you mean ones which are commonly referred to as torpedo heaters? i.e. ones which basically comprise a horizontal cylinder with a naked flame inside (akin to the back end of a mini-jet engine) and fuelled usually by propane from a separate cylinder or paraffin (kerosene) from a tank beneath the cylinder. During my years as an HSE inspector I saw a fair number of torpedo heaters in various workplaces as they were apparently a cheap and quick way to heat sizeable indoor workspaces - and also noisy, emitted notable quantities of water vapour and could be smelly, especially if the burners weren't kept clean or correctly adjusted. From recollection the main concerns about such heaters were the stability and integrity of the cylinders and hoses for propane fuelled ones, and keeping them positioned so that the heat emitted didn't impinge on combustible items or employees, etc. Even so, as routinely used heating appliances they're not appropriate subjects for Hot work Permits. Similar considerations also apply to LPG cabinet type heaters i.e. ones usually fuelled by butane from cylinders inside their casings.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.