Rank: Forum user
|
Good morning all,
I'm after some specific advice with regards to the education sector and also the healthcare sector.
I'm after some advice on areas that are specific to both areas that are not general H&S But specific to each area, I've got to present to each sector to try and gain contracts, so I want to elude to specific areas of concern in each area.
As always any advice and guidance would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Research 'Safeguarding' areas for a start
what kind of work are u looking to tender for? As both areas are very very large areas with a lot of specific subjects and ways of working with a pupil/patent first, second, third etc. culture with care of employees low on the agenda in those cultures
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Bob,
Looked at Safeguarding, I appreciate both areas are massive, i appreciate the General H&S in both areas, i'm looking at specifics, i.e. healthcare, I believe the points highlighted below are specific to healthcare:
Casualty Evacuation in an Emergency training and guidance
Clinical waste management
Entanglement injury prevention (Bed rails etc.)
Medical Gases safety training and guidance
Slips, trips & falls within a medical environment (non-clinical)
Medical safer sharps awareness
PPE
Radiation Limits & Exposure (X-Ray, Gamma & MRI)
COSHH
etc etc
They are looking for General Consultancy, GAP Analysis and a training needs analysis.
Cheers
Gareth
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Gareth
You openly admit to pitching for work in areas about which you have some uncertainties and, well, who knows how much expertise.
And you want assistance. Since I work in some but not all of these areas, do I compete, do I capitulate, or do I expect a generous percentage?
None of the options particularly appeal, but I guess it will be the first one.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ian,
Your right, I don't specialise in these areas, hence the reason I'm asking for advice. My Company is pitching for a contract in these areas, and if successful, we will probably bring in a specialist in these areas.
What else is this forum for other than to share experience and offer advice and guidance?
Gareth
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Education & healthcare are not my areas at all - but as a general principle it scares me that h&s people/salesmen are pitching for work in areas they freely admit they know nothing/little about.
Professional standards and all that stuff!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Gareth
When you qualify your enquiry by indicating the tender apparently refers to 'General Consultancy. GAP analysis and training needs analysis', you may be able to differentiate your offer by showing evidence of competence in relevant use of inferential statistics (e.g. multiple regression), survey management and safety coaching and applied ergonomics
Provided you can show evidence of validdated methodologies in these areas you may be able to compete credibly both with general consultancies who don't employ H & S specialists and with H & S practices without state-of-the-art knowhow in these specific areas of competence.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Kieran,
Thanks for the advice, appreciated.
Regards
Gareth
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Gareth
You have stated: 'I want to elude (presumably you mean 'allude') to specific areas of concern in each area'.
If you intend to offer more than routine approaches to legal compliance, you will need to have regard for how the sectors you are choosing respond to diffusion of innovation, and how different interest groups and traditions in each are likely to respond to efforts of diffusion of innovation.
While an article in the March 2003 issue of SHP ('Seeds that scatter' by Richard Byrne) touches on this issue, the summary guide by the leading research in this field is worth digesting - 'Diffusion of innovations', E Rogers, The Free Press. Fifth edition. 2003. Rogers can enable you to explain what specific groups are most likely to support your proposals at early stages, and why, so that you can convince decisionmakers you wasnt to influence that you can reach them and match the right attributes of your services to their readiness to adopt them, smartly and economically.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Gareth
Those with whom you hope to contact will be expecting good quality advice on a range of tops. Some here have provided help in adding to that list.
I can't help but remind you that in some of these areas, the implications of getting it even not quite right can be the heavy, and very costly, hand of regulation. Though as a consequence you may find yourself in the firing line there will be a far greater impact for your client(s) and for the taxpayer.
Even worse, along with twisted ankles and the like are some dramatically life changing and potentially fatal incidents and infections that demand a level of expertise in prevention and management, and in training, that you may not be able to provide. I hope you can recognise that and will act accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ian's thoughtful comments are necessary warnings about being mindful of boundaries on any safety intervention.
At the same time, they also suggest far-reaching issues about safety leadership, sometimes summarised in the question, 'Who will guard the guardians?'
Research by social psychologists on the part that leaders play in the creation and exercise of the social identity of organisations has thrown valuable light on the leadership potential of safety coaching.
According to Alex Haslam, Stephen Reicher and Michael Platow in The Social Identity of Leadership (Psychology Press, 2011, effective leaders contribute to the formation and development of the social identity of groups and organisations. They lead precisely by articulating and representing elements of what is most essential to them as a social entity and of what differentiates them from others.
In this light, the evolution of the profession of specialists dedicated to safeguarding people, physically and psychologically, at work, itself entails the formation of their social identity as a group distinct from other specialists.
A safety coaching practitioner can help in this respect by stimulating and supporting leaders in an organisation in which she works to greater clarity and incisiveness about effective uses of resources available for safeguarding and to periodical realignment of their aims and uses of resources, without allowing ‘lagging’ indicators of accidents to prompt stocktaking.
Both Gareth's question and Ian's comments can be understood as mindful contributions in the very, very gradual evolution of safety leadership.
In my modest experience of serving in several corners of both, the education and healthcare sectors could each benefit from the exercise of mindful safety leadership. And probably the sooner the better
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
With this forum there some that consider themselves to be the be all and end all of all knowledge on a subject. Some have thrown teddies out of their cots because they believed at the time, (and clearly still do), that they and only they can answer a question. That in itself does wind me up. However what gets my back up more are the constant stream of so called health and safety professionals who do not practice what they should preach to others. There are far too many coming onto this forum site without the necessary training, knowledge, skills, experience, and also not knowing their own limitations. Some of the posts should be entitled “I don’t have a clue on the subject but if you send me a PowerPoint I can blag it.com”
IMO it’s about time IOSH started to get hold of this issue and clapping down. This post deals with an area where you want people without the skill sets delivering advice or giving advice on subjects they know nout about. Watch the news re NHS at the moment and think before posting. Would you want someone with medical experience delivering a course to hospital cleaners on the subject of klebsiella pneumoniae bacterium. I can hardly spell it, let alone risk assess it. Likewise, if you work on an oil/gas rig. Do you want someone puffed up with their own self importance because they have a Diploma, delivering the NEBOSH oil and gas course that has only seen an oil rig on TV, but has a PowerPoint given to them by the bloke in the pub. They think that hydrates is a drink that you take after the gym session, but they will take your pennies for delivering the training they think that you need.
What is worse is that a number of IOSH members don’t actually seem to see the problem. So for my two penny worth, I fully endorse the posts submitted by Ian B. and could not agree more.…………rant over.
Crack on.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thank you, and I had expected the more usual rant of 'we excel at everything and will not accept criticism of any kind!'
Actually, Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the less important bacteria for hospital cleaners to concern themselves with since its mode of transmission is unlikely to fall within the scope of their activities.
But you do spell it properly, though as a proper name Klebsiella should be capitalised. Congratulations.
Why am I concerned about this? Well, as a microbiologist I work in the healthcare AND educational (University) sectors, for the health regulator and in the private sector where I have a steady stream of claimants and defendants concerned about matters of infection. I also offer specialist training and support in some of these areas, so yes, there is the purely commercial perspective also.
I frequently see, and I am invited to manage, deficiencies in clinical waste management in the UK and elsewhere, including resource poor regions. I also many sharps injury cases, to healthcare professionals, ancillary and support staff, waste management and public sector workers, and to private individuals, including injuries to young children. My practice is international, and involves also work with various standards committees, and pro bono activities that include the provision of specialist support to Hepatitis C support groups.
I have published extensively on the biological and other hazards associated with clinical wastes, at home and abroad, and on sharps injury. I have an ongoing study (so far 7 years) of 40 sharps injury 'victims' who would be, I suspect, quite happy to tell you exactly where you can stick your bid for training that is based on such shallow foundations and borrowed expertise.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I can’t believe how condescending some people are when offering there opinions, I was in the Army for 23 years and we had a saying there, “if in doubt, ask”, I thought that this forum was about sharing knowledge and expertise, not acting as a spell check!! If some of these comments had been said face to face, the outcome would’ve been total carnage, why do certain people think that they come on this forum and use it to vent their spleen at all and sundry?
I have SME’s (subject matter experts), joining my team as part of the projects, what I was after was an overview of the common HSE failures within Healthcare & Education, so that as the old saying goes, fore armed is fore warned.
Thanks to those who offered sensible solutions to problems.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hello Gareth,
It seems to me that the answers/advice you got were a true reflection of your failure to articulate your question in such a way that would be well understood. Did you want the forum to give or advise you on "an overview of the common HSE failures in Education and Healthcare" as you have summed up? Or your project team wants to work on health and safety management in a specific educational setting such as a local school or university, and a specific healthcare setting such as a local hospital, community clinic, private dental clinic or diagnostic laboratory? Surely,occupational health and safety practice is analogous to medical practice. You must have the certified competence (knowledge, skills, experience) before taking the task, in your case contract. Why not employ the experts and set up the project team to formulate and then put up a tender for the contract?
SG
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Gareth, to a point, I'm in full agreement with you - "if in doubt, ask" is entirely correct.
But, "If in doubt, teach" sends shivers down my spine.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.