Rank: Forum user
|
I am looking for an idea of the health and safety personnel structures that are out there for companies with approximately 10,000 employees. I am trying to ascertain what the avarage number of staff is for provision of occupational health and safety within sme' of 10,000 employees.
Any info would be greatly appreciated
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Split over how many sites of what size?
1x safety person at each + dotted line into Head of
1x lower level safety bod at each + dotted line into Regional + Head of
It varies
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The number of employees in an organisation is not the sole basis upon which an appropriate health and/or safety function can be defined. What are the inherent hazards in the business? How many sites are in use? Are specialist competencies required which might be sourced outside of the organisation? There are a huge number of variables which start to define what an appropriate safety function or team might look like. The applicable legislation might also have some influence on this if the organisation falls into any of the more specific regulations, such as COMAH, Ionising Radiation, etc.
I am also intrigued that an employer of 10,000 is described as a Small / Medium Enterprise.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Stephen, I agree. I work for an employer with 3,000 employees, we also have 10,000 volunteers. The main thing that determines the size of my team is the number and geographical spread of the workplaces; we have 400 between Penzance and Dingwall. So I have to have four people who spend half their lives in their cars. If we were a small hospital with an attached fundraising superstore there would be me and a retail person,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
John, you are absolutely correct as hazards are not only presented to employees but also 'others' and this is another consideration of how a business organises itself to manage these. (My name is actually David but I do not know how to change my screen name!)
David
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
thanks for your replies, apologies for the vagueness and the error with the SME thing, it is Friday afternoon after all :)
The SME reference was because I was writing something else at the same time ! The object was to try to get some understanding of Companies in this range and the different types of structures in place. I entirely agree that specialisms and inherent hazards will ultimately skew figures.
I will rethink how to specifiy what I would like, to make it much clearer and easier to ask.
Bill
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.