Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Roz  
#1 Posted : 21 March 2013 09:22:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Roz

I have recently been involved with an issue raised in a refinish workshop where individuals use work benches and DSE style chairs to undertake various tasks. The operatives wear RPE and use a harness to hold the canisters whilst they undertake their duties either in a seated position or standing. Individuals are not able to sit back in the current chairs to get any support to their backs due to the restrictions/position of the canisters which do not allow the operative to sit back and benefit from the back support. This results in the individuals having to take the weight of the RPE and associated canisters which are quite heavy. Does anyone else undertake such activities and if so can you advise what equipment is used in order to reduce the weight on the individuals back. I am currently looking at stool type seats which are on wheels and allow the individual to be mobile but do not provide any support to their backs whilst seated. Is there is a different type of harness which allows the canisters to be held in a different position and allow operatives to sit back in a chair when working? Or is there a chair / seat which would assist with this issue? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Roz
Phil Grace  
#2 Posted : 21 March 2013 10:03:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

I have to ask the question: If this work is being done at a "fixed workstation" i.e. a bench as you describe why hasn't engineering control been investigated as an option? In the usual sequence of controls RPE should be a last resort after all the other options have been investigated/considered. Has use of a fume cupboard, glove box or other LEV been considered/rejected? Phil
Kate  
#3 Posted : 21 March 2013 10:29:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Canisters? Do you mean of air? Is filter-based RPE unsuitable? Or how about installing an air line they can connect to?
John J  
#4 Posted : 21 March 2013 19:59:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

I'm taking this to mean filters. What product(s) are you filtering out?
Roz  
#5 Posted : 27 March 2013 08:43:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Roz

Thank you for the replies to date. The reason for the RPE is to filter against solvents and fibres. The area is a large refinish workshop with various benches located around the workshop. There is an extracting system in place but LEV's are not practical in this environment.
walker  
#6 Posted : 27 March 2013 09:33:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

I think you need to reconsider #2 and not dismiss the advice as not practical. I assume you have fully thought out the implications of your COSHH and DSEAR duties
Steven n  
#7 Posted : 27 March 2013 12:08:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steven n

I would be helful to know how many Operators are using the RPE because I agree with walker simply to say LEV is not practical would not be a good answer for enforcement. Given the hierarchy and the cost of RPE, replacement filters, face fit testing etc. Portable LEV units may be a much better alternative.
peter gotch  
#8 Posted : 27 March 2013 12:57:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Agree with Steven N. Google Nederman Also could probably put the spray equipment onto a stand to save the need for harness.
chris.packham  
#9 Posted : 27 March 2013 14:14:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

I would question the statement that LEV is not practical. If they work at workbenches have you considered downdraft benches as opposed to the 'conventional' methods? I have used these with success with a wide variety of activities, ranging from the use of angle grinders through to laboratory chemical and soldering in an electronics plant where 'normal' LEV was considered impractical or simply was not working. If you want more on this PM me. Chris
Kate  
#10 Posted : 27 March 2013 15:19:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Do the filters really need to be as heavy as they are and carried on the back?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.