Rank: Forum user
|
Hi all.
Is there a legal requirement to have a passenger lift in a 3 store premise (approx 150 - 200 staff) when there are no non-ambulant staff in the building? Should we ever employ a wheelchair user, I would of course carry out a full RA and PEEP for that individual and look at any options then. I just need to know where we stand now.
Thanks for any opinions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Sorry, that should say 3 storey above. It is an office building.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi there, the quick reply is that there are no specific legal requirements under H&S. If you look at Building Regs, there may be something, but those Regs only apply to new/changes to buildings and are not retrospective.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ivorheadache wrote:Hi all.
Is there a legal requirement to have a passenger lift in a 3 store premise (approx 150 - 200 staff) when there are no non-ambulant staff in the building? Should we ever employ a wheelchair user, I would of course carry out a full RA and PEEP for that individual and look at any options then. I just need to know where we stand now.
Thanks for any opinions. What about a visitor?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ivor, I note your Group indicates retail. As a customer I am a very rare visitor to anywhere I am expected to climb 3 floors of stairs on each visit. That's my law!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks guys.
David, this isn't retail, it's an office building with no disabled at present. Jim, I think your answer is what I was after. no legal requirement unless refurbished.
Many thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi guys. I just want to reverse this question. If a lift is in the building which is rarely used and requires a substantial amount of money to bring it up to standard, can it be decommissioned until such times as it may be needed i.e. for disability?
The reason I ask is we have just taken over the offices and the previous owners did not adequately maintain the lift. The quote to upgrade it was in the 10's of 1000's.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ivor, the DDA says that you should make 'reasonable provision' for people with mobility problems. In this case if you knew that you were geting a visitor that could not climb the stairs, you could always meet them at ground floor level. That is 'reasonable' and is also the much cheaper option!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ivorheadache - if you rely on a lift for disabled access, you will have to ensure that it is an entirely independant power source and suitable for use in a fire situation, many are not! Far better to make reasonable provision as Bluenose suggests as long as that meets the needs of the mobility impaired and the organisation. Note however - DDA no longer exists it is the Equality Act duties that must be met now.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Once again, thanks for the help. I have given my company the options available. I just needed to know the legal requirements first. Thanks bilbo. I wasn't aware of the Equality act replacing the DDA. I have had a look and will need to update our disability policies.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
bilbo wrote:ivorheadache - if you rely on a lift for disabled access, you will have to ensure that it is an entirely independant power source and suitable for use in a fire situation, many are not! Far better to make reasonable provision as Bluenose suggests as long as that meets the needs of the mobility impaired and the organisation. Note however - DDA no longer exists it is the Equality Act duties that must be met now. To make a lift acceptable for evacuations, you need to provide much more than an 'independent' power source
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.