Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
KKemp  
#1 Posted : 16 April 2013 12:38:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KKemp

Hello,
We have recently upgraded out FLTs (Reach) and they now have seat belts fitted. For our Counter Balance truck we alread wore a seat belt but for the reach trucks the guy are on / off all day.

Do they have to wear the seat belts?
Thanks for your help
Katie
stuie  
#2 Posted : 16 April 2013 12:48:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stuie

I don't believe there is anything written in law that says seatbelts are compulsory. As with most things it is down to RA, what does your RA/SSOW for the task say - if there is a danger of collision/overturning etc then I would suggest that a seatbelt is a must?
We only have counterbalance trucks but we have a company policy that states the seatbelts must be worn.
HTH
Stuart
KKemp  
#3 Posted : 16 April 2013 12:53:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KKemp

Thank you,
We also have the counter balance and seat belts must be worn for them too always.
Thanks for your opinion
Katie
Mr.Flibble  
#4 Posted : 16 April 2013 13:00:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Mr.Flibble

Hi Kate,

Some light reading for you: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/misc241.pdf

Hally  
#5 Posted : 16 April 2013 13:05:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Since 2002, counterbalanced trucks, rough-terrain trucks and side-loading trucks, one side only, must be fitted with an operator restraining system (for example a seat belt). For older trucks which do not have one, you should fit a restraining system if the risk assessment indicates that there is a risk of the vehicle overturning and where the operator may be trapped between the truck and the ground. Where restraining systems are fitted they should be used.

Where a restraining system cannot be fitted, and the risks are sufficiently high, it will be necessary to use another lift truck which has such a system. Any lift truck fitted with a roll-over protective structure (ROPS) to protect operators from the risk of injury resulting from 180° or more roll-over should be fitted with a restraining system.


And that is from

http://www.hse.gov.uk/wo...ort/lift-trucks/faqs.htm
dennish  
#6 Posted : 16 April 2013 17:31:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
dennish

Never seen a seat belt on a reach truck as they are side with the forks at the side and the risk of trapping for a lateral overturn is non exsistant. as per previous guides "Nor is it required on masted trucks which can only roll over through 90° if the operator cannot be trapped between the truck and the ground, eg if the truck has a cab with self-closing and latching doors which have no facilities for retaining them open in use.
LTs with a side-seated operator and cab access from the rear (eg masted reach trucks) or which have a stand-on operator, are not required to have operator restraint. The operator is unlikely to be trapped between the LT and the ground in the event of an overturn."
IanDakin  
#7 Posted : 17 April 2013 14:57:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

I too have never seen a seat belt on a reach truck. However, Regulation 27 of PUWER covers this, so I would ask the truck provider if under regulation 27, or the new improver L117, a seat belt is required.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.