Rank: Super forum user
|
I understand that the head protection regs are now "gone".
My question is, are hard hats a legal requirement on "construction" sites? Does this apply to eg where a small builder is working refurbishing a house with no scaffolds and overhead hazards? Is there a cut off point?
I don't want to know about BEST PRACTICE, but what is actually REQUIRED?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You didn't need them before if there were no overhead hazards - the regs said if the only risk of head injury was falling down and hitting your head, you didn't need to wear one.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Included in the Press release that talks of the demise of the Head Protection regs - are the words along the lines of The PPE regs are being amended accordingly - whilst I haven't seen the reworded PPE regs - they might hold your answer.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Your legal requirement duty is to carry out a risk assessment (that is suitable and sufficient).
If your risk assessment details a potential hazard that would require head protection then you need it, if your risk assessment says that there is no such hazard then there’s no need for head protection.
However if don’t identify a hazard & then subsequently have an accident that a hard hat would have prevented or minimised you won’t have much of a leg to stand on as the HSE would rightly argue that head protection is standard across the vast majority of refurbishment projects.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
pikeman
In addition to revoking the Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989, the Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 1992 have been amended so that they apply to the provision and use of head protection on construction sites as well as to other forms of PPE.
Although the regulations have changed, the level of legal protection has not. Hard hats remain vital in protecting construction workers from head injuries. The necessity for hard hats on construction sites remains, and employers do not need to do anything differently to comply with the law. HSE is working with the industry (particularly small contractors) to ensure they understand this important duty. The proposals make no changes to section11
chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
To be honest, only a 'dead head' would not use a hard hat on-site if there was a chance of an injury. 'You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows...' BD. Give people a litle credit.
For me, as an electrician, whould I wear one in a nursing hoem when testing? Nope. On-site with people working above me? Yep.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
In my opinion getting rid of the hard hat regulations is a stupid decision. Done for political posturing. I can't see the benefit other than HSE, Lofstedt and politicians being able to brag that they have reduced health and safety legislation. The downside is that people and the press who do not understand the PPE Regulations will assume that hard hats are no longer required and therefore head injuries will increase. I could be wrong but why take such a stupid risk in removing an effective set of regulations?!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Quite right Buzz. Well said
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Superfluous Regs in my opinion. If there is a significant risk of head injury then an appropriate set of controls should be applied, which may include head protection. Presecriptive regulation is supposedly "old hat" in UK.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
David Bannister wrote:Superfluous Regs in my opinion. If there is a significant risk of head injury then an appropriate set of controls should be applied, which may include head protection. Presecriptive regulation is supposedly "old hat" in UK.
I agree in theory in that they are 'old hat' (like the pun!), prescriptive and superfluous. However, I still fear that removing them will dilute the take up of head protection. I'm a bit out of touch with the construction industry these days so please correct me if I am wrong but I would imagine that many construction workers may not know what the PPE Regulations are or what the Head Protection Regulations are? - but they do know that wearing a hard had on site is the law?
If my assumption is correct, then removing the hard hat regulations may well result in misunderstandings in the press - a bit like the working at height regulations and all the misinformation that you couldn't use ladders anymore - or even COSHH and accounts of you have to pay expensive consultants to carry out COSHH assessments on a bottle of tippex.
I can picture it now; The article in the Daily Wail:
" PM hits back at health and safety monster - a victory for common sense: Our marvellous PM has fought against the excessive jobs-worth red-tape health and safety monster and removed pointless rules and regulations such as the over the top laws making builders wear hard hats on construction sites. Builder Roy Hobbs says "This fantastic news. My wife used to hate me coming home with greasy hair from wearing a hard hat all day. Now I can come home with my lovely hair in place." Site Agent, Joe Bloggs said "This is a victory for common sense. Previously I had to price in the costs of hard hats into the job. Now I can make some great cost savings which can ultimately passed onto our client".
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.