Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
gramsay  
#1 Posted : 30 May 2013 09:04:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gramsay

Currently delegates at our training courses sign an attendance form at the start. I'd like to change this to something they sign at the end which acknowledges at least that they understood the training. Would anyone be able to share examples of any wording you use for something like this? Does anyone include other items in any similar statement? I know this doesn't prove that someone was competent, or even that the training was any good, but at least being able to confirm that our trainees understood what was being delivered should be useful? Any comments or criticisms would be appreciated - thanks
Peter_OC  
#2 Posted : 30 May 2013 09:11:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Peter_OC

Why not keep the attendance sheet at the start, and have a short multiple choice test at the end. 5 questions on the content of the training course, true or false, or 3 possible answers with one correct..... They will put their name on this and will test their understanding of the content.
gramsay  
#3 Posted : 30 May 2013 09:16:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
gramsay

Thanks Peter - we run lots of different courses and most have some sort of test or check. What I was thinking about was having a statement which is there for every single training activity in addition to any test, whether it's a workplace induction, a certificated food hygeine course or a refresher on how to use our site-specific risk assessments. You're right about needing more than just a signature to confirm the usefulness of the training.
chris.packham  
#4 Posted : 30 May 2013 09:30:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

When we run a training course we always have a feedback form. This allows participants to comment on the course and make suggestions as to how this could be improved. For our open courses the form also includes a box in which they can clearly print how they would like their name to appear on the certificate of attendance which encourages completion of the form. This would probably not be applicable to an in-house training seminar. I would have this form in addition to any test. By carefully framing the questions you could encourage comment and get a good idea of what they found interesting and easy to understand and what caused them problems. I am always surprised how much useful comment comes from these forms. Chris
messyshaw  
#5 Posted : 30 May 2013 09:33:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

I agree with Peter that a simple/easy multichoice 'quiz' at the end is the less problematic solution. When I was in the fire service, I (along with my colleagues) were ask to sign to confirm we had read & understood a 400 page document which was our H&S policy. I crossed out the word 'understand' from the form so to show I had read the document but I could not be absolutely sure I understood every paragraph on every page. It caused a few issues. The point is, how can you ask someone if they understood any training? They may think they have, but may be wrong. Legally, it's a minefield. A sample Q&A at the end of any input is a much better method. We use around 10 different sets of Q&A papers after fire training which we use at random. They are designed to be easy, if not fun to complete and form a wider questionnaire aimed at training/trainer feedback
Kate  
#6 Posted : 30 May 2013 19:28:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I agree with the multiple choice test approach.
Safety Smurf  
#7 Posted : 31 May 2013 10:44:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

I would personally call it confirmation of learning as opposed to training and I also would apply an end test. I doubt any signed statement of understanding would stand up in court. All of our outlet management teams have to attend an in-house course on managing safety within their stores and they have to pass it to be allowed to take reponsibility. They get 2 attempts. As an incentive ;-) we tell the area managers that they are responsible for what goes on in each store until there is a manager in place who has passed the course.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.