Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
bob youel  
#1 Posted : 17 June 2013 11:34:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

What do people think of the new 'on the spot revoking of a driving license' power the police now have [since Feb 2013] and its relationship to work; is it a H&S or HR issue or what is it? Discuss
Quaker  
#2 Posted : 17 June 2013 14:04:09(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Quaker

Are you referring to the police power to apply for a driving licence revocation of an individual for failing a roadside sight test, i.e. checking that a driver can read a number plate correctly at 20m. Which can now be done by email rather than the previous method which required them to make this application by mail and if successful a licence revocation can now be issued in hours rather than several days? (Also known as Cassie's law) This process should be a stepping stone to a full medical evaluation, but if you can't read a number plate at 20m then you shouldn't be driving. Our annual workplace medicals include a sight test for all drivers to ensure that they continue to meet the medical standards for driving and were prescription spectacles are required to meet the eyesight standard we ensure that the driver is aware that they are mandatory, whether it is a company car or a fork lift truck. I would say it is health and safety.
bob youel  
#3 Posted : 17 June 2013 14:17:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Q: Yep The police can do an on-the-spot roadside email to the DVLA who will revoke a licence instantaneously and email the revoke back to the police. The driver is then stuck as is his employer if the driver is working [driving] for their employer at the time of the event!
achrn  
#4 Posted : 17 June 2013 14:45:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

bob youel wrote:
The driver is then stuck as is his employer if the driver is working [driving] for their employer at the time of the event!
If the driver can't read a number plate at 20m then I for one want them off the road immediately, and if they are driving for work that's not a reason to let them carry on. So what if the employer is then "stuck" - they shouldn't be relying on an illegal driver.
bob youel  
#5 Posted : 17 June 2013 15:23:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

achrn I agree with U entirely - I was only making a comment
Animax01  
#6 Posted : 17 June 2013 15:57:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

If they are driving for an employer it is quite possible that they are driving something larger and more dangerous than a family car. They may also be carrying high consequence goods or travel through highly populated areas. I agree with this move, any motorised vehicle is potentially a death machine in the wrong hands. How many needless deaths or injury's do we see every year that may be avoided....
A Kurdziel  
#7 Posted : 17 June 2013 15:58:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Does this mean that we all need to be checking our drivers to make sure that they can (at least) past this vision test and we are not left with vans etc abandoned around the country?
achrn  
#8 Posted : 17 June 2013 16:28:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

A Kurdziel wrote:
Does this mean that we all need to be checking our drivers to make sure that they can (at least) past this vision test and we are not left with vans etc abandoned around the country?
No, you need to be checking your drivers to make sure that they can pass this vision test so you don't have employees driving illegally around the country. Whether your company van gets stuck should be the least of your worries. The fact that you might be employing as a driver someone not physically fit to drive and the risk that they will consequently kill a 16-yr-old walking to school should be rather higher up the list of concerns, in my view.
biker1  
#9 Posted : 17 June 2013 16:39:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
biker1

I'd be all in favour of this new facility the police have (although sadly there are far fewer of them around to use it). I for one don't want to share the road with someone who cannot even see properly, let alone react correctly. In fact, I'd extend this to other things, like the number of people driving around with a mobile phone stuck to their ear. In this age of hands free options, there is simply no excuse for this, and in any case the skill level of the average British motorist would not allow them to drive and conduct a phone conversation safely at the same time. Making the use of a hand held phone illegal has not reduced the practice, in fact it is now worse than ever, and trivial fines are not going to stop it.
Roundtuit  
#10 Posted : 17 June 2013 17:27:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Another power that extends limply to a FEW road users unfortunate enough to hold a UK issued driving licence - what about the Lithuanian (other nationalities are available) lorry driver? Diplomats on CD plates? Foreign service personnel serving in the UK (for those living near one of our "allies" bases)? IMHO this is a Company Policy matter which should have been covered by the HR issued contract of employment - for drivers there is a required skill i.e. driving licence and generally a documented condition that should the driver loose their licence for whatever reason they are unable to fulfil their contract (drink, drugs, speeding etc.) - I have even seen some contracts that prohibit the employee holding the type of insurance policy that provides a chauffeur service in the event of loss of licence (now there is something that should be legislated against). The classic with this one is the stipulated period during which the Police can stop a driver to conduct the eye sight test - permanent night shifts for Mr Quincy Magoo?
Roundtuit  
#11 Posted : 17 June 2013 17:27:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Another power that extends limply to a FEW road users unfortunate enough to hold a UK issued driving licence - what about the Lithuanian (other nationalities are available) lorry driver? Diplomats on CD plates? Foreign service personnel serving in the UK (for those living near one of our "allies" bases)? IMHO this is a Company Policy matter which should have been covered by the HR issued contract of employment - for drivers there is a required skill i.e. driving licence and generally a documented condition that should the driver loose their licence for whatever reason they are unable to fulfil their contract (drink, drugs, speeding etc.) - I have even seen some contracts that prohibit the employee holding the type of insurance policy that provides a chauffeur service in the event of loss of licence (now there is something that should be legislated against). The classic with this one is the stipulated period during which the Police can stop a driver to conduct the eye sight test - permanent night shifts for Mr Quincy Magoo?
Geoff 1954  
#12 Posted : 18 June 2013 11:43:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Geoff 1954

I am aware that this could happen to any driver however is there any evidence to suggest that it is actually happening? Geoff
Betta Spenden  
#13 Posted : 18 June 2013 12:09:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Betta Spenden

Roundtuit wrote:
Foreign service personnel serving in the UK (for those living near one of our "allies" bases)?
Just a little bit unfair me thinks. The USAF are not a bunch of cowboys. They have a very active and effecient safety team based here in the UK. They invest in safety and are willing to pay for good service, which is more than can be said for some UK companies. One of the team is a British national with good sound UK & US qualifications (also an IOSH forum member) and he does stirling work with new arrivals. He holds regular training sessions on driving in the UK and has had a significant impact reducing incident rates. Crack on.
Roundtuit  
#14 Posted : 18 June 2013 13:23:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

and the US is one of 28 members of N.A.T.O. - no slight was targeted towards any individual country merely the observation that based upon the length of their tour within the UK that many service personnel may not necessarily have to apply for a DVLA issued licence.
Roundtuit  
#15 Posted : 18 June 2013 13:23:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

and the US is one of 28 members of N.A.T.O. - no slight was targeted towards any individual country merely the observation that based upon the length of their tour within the UK that many service personnel may not necessarily have to apply for a DVLA issued licence.
johnmurray  
#16 Posted : 18 June 2013 17:11:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

The roadside eyesight test can only be carried out in daylight. On evenings and weekends where the police consider the circumstance merits immediate action, they can use their powers to impose bail conditions. These include requiring a person not to drive as a condition of bail. If a person subject to a no-drive condition broke it, he/she could be taken to court.
rayh  
#17 Posted : 20 June 2013 11:27:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ray Hurst

Damn good idea. I can recall this incident well as the fatal accident that led to this change in the law happened here in Essex. Cassie McCord had been walking in Colchester town centre with a friend when an out of control car mounted the pavement and struck her trapping her between it and a shop wall. Three days earlier, police officers had spent two hours trying to persuade the 87-year-old driver not to drive his automatic Vauxhall Astra again after he was involved in a minor incident, failed an eye test and had to be driven home. At the time the officers had no powers to immediately suspend his licence and sadly the driver chose not to heed their advice. The officers had applied to DVLA to revoke his licence but he hadn't received notification from DVLA at the time of the second incident. I would hope all employers with drivers (whatever they may drive) are undertaking regular checks of their staff to ensure that they meet at least minimum standards covering all aspects of driving (including eyesight) as a Road Safety Officer for 8 years before entering the Occupational Health and Safety Field in 1982 Managing Occupational Road Risk has always been one of those areas I maintain a keen interest in. I am currently required to undertake a driver assessment test every 3 years to allow me to continue to drive on business, that includes an eyesight test.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.