Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
firesafety101  
#1 Posted : 07 July 2013 15:39:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Can anyone clarify what the standards are in relation to private dwellings where a refurbishment is being carried out by the local council of an existing bathroom for use by a wheelchair user? Document M refers to non dwellings. Is there a difference to the requirements when the refurbishment involves an extension to the room but stays within the existing boundary, as opposed to a building extension that actually extends the building?
Canopener  
#2 Posted : 08 July 2013 10:32:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Yes, I would say that by far your best bet is the building control department of your local council who should be able to give you the 'definitive answer.
firesafety101  
#3 Posted : 08 July 2013 11:42:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Hi canopener, I just had a chat with building control and they aren't really interested. Part M doesn't apply to domestic and as it is not a new building the rest of the requirements for wheelchair users don't either. I need a magician !
sadlass  
#4 Posted : 08 July 2013 13:21:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sadlass

As the council is doing this, they set the specification, maybe in conjunction with those doing the work. Some architects also specialise in such adaptations (I know of one in Yorkshire, used by LAs there). I think the challenge is that all domestic situations vary, so the specs have to be flexible, as long as they conform to building regs. The client may want something which is difficult to achieve in their home, so the council may suggest an alternative (eg. shower rather than bath, wetroom etc.). I am not sure if you are unhappy with a proposal for a private situation, or somehow involved with the provider.
firesafety101  
#5 Posted : 09 July 2013 10:27:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

sadlass it's for my house and my wheelchair user daughter who already has a g floor ensuite but very small bedroom. LA want to use some of out living room to extend the bathroom then extend the bedroom into the space left behind. The cost is higher than my proposal which is a first floor extension to form a bedroom. They don't like my idea as they always utilise the available space within the existing walls of the house. It does appear that LA can do what they want?????
sadlass  
#6 Posted : 09 July 2013 21:15:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sadlass

Try talking to the specifier / designer and if that fails go to the service manager if you can demonstrate a clear cost-effective alternative solution. However, I suspect there is a rule here about not adding value to the property for no good reason, so that the cost difference would have to be very high to make an extension the preferred option. Yes they can do what they like really, in this matter, as they hold the purse, as long as it is BR compliant.
biker1  
#7 Posted : 10 July 2013 13:33:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
biker1

My own experience is that local council social services departments have their own 'specifications', which often make life difficult if you live in anything smaller than a mansion. You could try pointing out the greater cost-effectiveness of your solution, but I suspect they will be so wrapped up in their protocols, you might as well tell the nearest wall.
firesafety101  
#8 Posted : 11 July 2013 09:00:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Sad but true I'm afraid. All we wanted was an extra 1.5 m on her bedroom which is at the front of the house, so no extending there. The scheme put forward by the council actually extends the bedroom by 1.4 m but takes off us use of part of our living room as they move the existing bathroom. The cost - £8k. That is £8k to achieve 1.4 metres on a bedroom 2.52 m wide.
chris42  
#9 Posted : 11 July 2013 09:10:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

A Thought Will the loss of some of the living room, make the space unusable for the person with the wheelchair, so might exclude them from normal family life in some way? Can you beat them with their own rules ? Chris
bob youel  
#10 Posted : 11 July 2013 09:44:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Just a thought would not a first floor situation add in difficulties for a wheel chair user?
firesafety101  
#11 Posted : 11 July 2013 10:49:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Bob she can transfer to a stair lift then onto a wheelchair at the top. Some councils provide a through floor lift but not this one! The loss of living space will only affect her when she wants to watch TV as that is where she does that. There will be no space for her TV. At present there is a G floor facility that was designed 8 years ago by myself and funded on a mortgage advance because the council would not help at that time The bathroom has all facilities and includes adequate turning circle. The new scheme does not provide the turning circle. There is also the question of what she does for a bathroom while the work is ongoing, she needs the room every two and a half to three hours for catheter etc. 24/7. The council have suggested respite care for her. That means her being farmed out to a foster home or social services respite centre. How's that for a caring council? A frist floor extension would not affect the existing at all, surely that must be part of the considerations. I know of others who have had marvellous experiences with Disabled Facilities Grants but they are in other areas, I'm afraid I live in the wrong area.
boblewis  
#12 Posted : 11 July 2013 14:23:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Do be aware of the sting in the tail of grants. If he house is sold within 10 years the LA has the right to recover 100% of the grant - it is NOT pro rata depending on how many years since the grant was awarded. Part M is not mandatory BUT you can argue it as a suitable standard for comparison. You are in the end tied to the LA specs and what your surveyor will agree.
firesafety101  
#13 Posted : 11 July 2013 19:46:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Yes Bob I am aware, no chance of me moving though. I spoke with building control who agree part M does not apply to existing. Planning will be required for taking down a wall and moving a window but nothing else.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.