Rank: Forum user
|
I would like a view from others with LOLER /BS7121 experience please.
I have a manufacturing client with a number of over head cranes, competently trained operators (ITSSAR) by a competent trainer. However the company does not have an "appointed Person" to plan lifting plans etc. Before i advise my client accordingly i would like feedback from forum users.
My view is that the company should have access to a competently trained appointed person as per standard BS7121.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Think the HSE link says it all: http://www.hse.gov.uk/wo...g-lifting-operations.htmBasically, there should be a basic lifting plan for standard lifts (could be generic depending if same location etc. Complex lifts require a complex lifting plan. Just had a mobile crane lift and would class this as complex because of sheer amount of diiferentials that could be present such as pedestrians, weight restrictions and buildings/strctures.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks thats my understanding as well. What i forgot to mention that some of the lifts are with the use of vacuum lifting equipment, which in itself i would class as complex i believe!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I would agree with you completely Mark they don't have to have a CSCS card but should attend a in house type Appointed Person training course.
It is always easy to say its only an overhead crane and they have been using it for years.
Then something falls on someones head. Stick by your guns you are right.
Ta Alex
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
At the risk of annoying people of a construction persuasion there is a world of a difference between overhead travelling cranes within works used for essentially repetitive tasks and mobiles etc. use in construction.
The first sentence of the HSE guidance referred to in post 2 starts "The planning of individual routine lifting operations may be the responsibility of those who carry them out (eg a slinger or crane operator). " The slinger and crane operator may well be the same person. Are they trained? Yes, it sounds like it. Were they trained on actual loads in their own works? If not then there's a familiarisation step to take (compare FLTs). And of course there are all the peripherals, like getting weights marked on drawings (I mean reliable weights with all the bits added, not rough guesses of the basic structure) and overall risk assessment to look at repeated issues like travel routes and sling selection and storage. But plan each lift individually? Only the real oddity.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jim, Again I agree. Think about it, as long as the load is within that of the crane, there can be no risks from external influences such as the ground etc. etc. as the system is totally proven for it's lift within its capability.
Are we going to insist on lifting plans for "job hoists" next, that is simple lifting aids that are used for lifting, say parts in and out of a jig on a production line every time there is a small deviation in the part being made, or do we need to do one very time, in case the weld on one part is heavier that that on another?
Come on, get COMPETENT people and let them do their job. If your employers won't pay for competent people then they get what they deserve, don't tie the world up in paperwork.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.