Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Folks
What are you thoughts on this?
In June 2012 one of our engineers was working under a machine, as he crouched down he knelt on a bolt that was protruding about 10-15mm from the floor. He mentioned it to his line manager at the time but didn't think any more of it and didn't incur any lost time. As there was no sign of injury there was no accident report completed - it was captured as a near miss and the bolt removed.
Fast forward to September 2012 and the engineer comes to see me and informs me that a couple of weeks after the accident he was on holiday abroad when he knee started to swell up and cause him discomfort. He was x-rayed and it was found that his kneecap was damaged - with what was described a 'dent' in the kneecap, not a fracture (still no lost time).
Fast forward again to September 2013 and I've now learnt that he is going into hospital for an operation on his knee (apparently to repair the damage), this will result in him being absent for 4-8 weeks.
It seems clear to me that it needs to be reported under RIDDOR but I've not been involved in an accident before where there has been such a long period between it actually happening and there being lost time.
I am curious to hear your opinions.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Danny
This is another example of the oddities of RIDDOR. If you are comfortable that there's a causal connection then it becomes a RIDDOR, even at this late stage, and by the sounds of it you have a good record trail behind you. The only suggestion I would make is to explain the chronology very clearly in the free text bit of the report to close off the question "why didn't you tell us sooner?". Arguably the late reporting clock has only just started ticking but it is an extreme "real world" situation.
Expect a flow of Friday Afternoon Commentators from here on, who may disagree!
Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I think if you believe there is a true connection then you may want to report it - with the explanation. The interesting bit is the 3 month initila gap and whether there were other activities the IP undertook in that time (not work-related) that may have caused the damage!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.