Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
bluefingers  
#1 Posted : 28 September 2013 11:32:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

As Health and Safety Advisor in a SME, reporting to the director who has responsibility for Health and Safety, am I at risk of prosecution if anything goes wrong? Should I be insured against this eventually?
Frank Hallett  
#2 Posted : 28 September 2013 11:45:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

OHH YEEES!!!

MHSW Regs & Case Law exists.


Depending on your actual Job Description; & given your other post re CSs, I would ensure that ALL safety communication with ALL management is in writing, traceable & auditable - not that I'm a cynic or anything!!

Frank Hallett
bluefingers  
#3 Posted : 28 September 2013 12:26:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

I should have posted that one after lunch as I have suddenly lost my appetite! Thanks for your response, it is much appreciated.
JJ Prendergast  
#4 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:04:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

JJ Prendergast  
#5 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:08:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

I doubt it, but in theory it is possible - if you give bad advice and are considered to be trained & competent.

You may have a very good defence in that you haven't been trained (or qualified) to do your job.

By the sound of it you have limited experience and qualifications with respect to h&s management.

It is the employers (your company) responsibility to ensure they have access to suitably competent persons to advise on h&s issues.

JJ Prendergast  
#6 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:11:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

Forgot to say, if you are an employee (not a contractor or otherwise self employed) then your company remains responsible for your actions/recommendations.

Its called vicarious liability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/...liability_in_English_law
bluefingers  
#7 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:19:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

JJ Prendergast
I am an employee. I am just getting into Health and Safety Management, I am a Health and safety Advisor, I passed the NEBOSH gen cert and I am working on the Diploma course. The company I work for has ISO 18001 and I am finding it really interesting pulling it all together. I have days where I feel isolated due to the attitude of Directors etc... towards H and S. Hence me joining IOSH for support.
It is appreciated.
JJ Prendergast  
#8 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:28:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

You probably have little to worry about then, in terms of personal prosecution.

Complete a suitable and sufficient confined space risk assessment & report.
Record your findings.
Make your recommendations.
Formally circulate your finding within your company safety management system and document control system.

Check and monitor for the recommendations being acted on.

Your company is then aware of what needs to be done.

Retain personal copies, if you think things could turn nasty as regards employment rights/arguments
djupnorth  
#9 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:33:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
djupnorth

Bluefingers,

I would have to disagree with Frank on this one, provided:

a. You are employed (not a contractor); and
b. You only provide advice to your employer and that advice is within the boundries of your competence.

Cases where health and safety advisers have been prosecuted are rare and specific to the cirumstances, namely that the adviser was in some way negligent (even grossly negligent) in the advice they gave.

I do agree with Frank that you should record any advice you give.

DJ
Frank Hallett  
#10 Posted : 28 September 2013 13:59:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

OK folks - I understand that maybe my response was a little to brief.

I answered the question posed re vulnerabality - nothing more. And there is sufficient Case Law to support that - both from HSWA S36/37 and also MHSW prosecutions.

As has been earlier identified, as an employee, your Employer is liable for your actions and also for ensuring that you're competent [if you read MHSW, you will find that this includes the necessary resources to do the job]; however, how you identify to the employer any deficiencies in your competence is critically important here.

I assume that you have a copy of L21 - free download from HSE? Get the pdf rather than the HTML 'cos it is easier to manipulate.

I'm sure that this will roll on so I'll leave it there.

Frank Hallett
Frank Hallett  
#11 Posted : 28 September 2013 14:32:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

Bluefingers - you have mail; provided you email works.

Frank Hallett
malcarleton  
#12 Posted : 28 September 2013 21:33:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
malcarleton

There are a whole load of issues here about responsibility and accountability, I got asked to write a safety case for the business area that I work in, even though I am a subcontractor working under the Primary Contractors Safety Management Plan (It gets worse) I refused, but added that I would assist wherever I could. Sometimes you just have to put you hand up and say "NO! that's Your job"
JJ Prendergast  
#13 Posted : 28 September 2013 22:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

Going back to the very original post question, the questions seems to be can you insure yourself against prosecution/fines.

The answer is NO

You can insure yourself against civil claims and claims for injuries against your advice, if it was shown to be incorrect.

But as we have established you are an employee, therefore your company is liable for errors and mistakes that you might make. So you don't need PI insurance as an employee.
bentonsr  
#14 Posted : 29 September 2013 11:44:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bentonsr

I know of someone who worked in a similar position a few years back where an employee was killed.
The H&S person was sacked as although it was proved he had had the training required to prevent the accident, he had done nothing to eliminate the risk.
The HSE never brought any prosecution against the H&S person because it was said that although the company had given him the necessary training, it had failed to ensure he was doing the job he was paid to do.
westonphil  
#15 Posted : 29 September 2013 21:40:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
westonphil

Do keep a perspective and remember that the person who would investigate the breach and bring a case to court will not be some uneducated person who will do it on a whim, so basically do your job properly and give decent advice in good faith and keep proper records. Keeping proper records is not just about preventing yourself from being prosecuted, it's a sensible part of the job and which can also serve to protect the company and other employees. It can be difficult if your boss does not see H&S as that important and probably that is the argument you need to make progress on, for the directors benefit and for that of the other people who work on your site.
David Borland  
#16 Posted : 30 September 2013 10:23:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
David Borland

Agree with all comments relating to keeping records of advice and communications.

Think about the message your selling. To some of the old school who have the very entrenched beliefs in terms of “just get it done” or “we’ve being doing it that way for years” you are never going to sell the idea that doing X, Y & Z is necessary to minimise the risk of hurting people because they don’t necessarily think there is a risk and that you are basically pushing “elf & safety” and being obstructive. Instead better to turn it round and “sell” what you are doing as reducing the risk exposure both to the individual concerned and the organisation – there is more than a subtle difference in how this should be perceived if explained in the right way and the end result in terms of compliance / development of SSOW should effectively be the same.

Finally, it is important to be part of the solution and not just viewed as the person with the stop sign. I have worked in manufacturing/light construction for years and it never ceases to amaze me how people can go out of their way to do things in weird and wonderful fashions, making make their jobs less efficient and riskier - but this is OK as they “have been doing it like that for years!”.

If you can actually take a step back, look at it from a practical perspective and work with people to develop more efficient (as well as safer) ways to do things then you become an asset, not just the health and safety guy. This is also a bit more pro-active than picking up the phone to the HSE which is a lot easier to say on this forum - insulated from the inevitiable fall out - than it is in practice. At the end of the day you need to work with these people!

Apologies if the above is teaching you how to suck eggs and good luck with the job.
A Kurdziel  
#17 Posted : 30 September 2013 11:41:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

I went to a H&S workshop recently and the HSE told us about what they do if there has been a fatality in the workplace. They said that for the last investigation of this sort they interviewed the H&S manager for half and hour and the works manager for 2 days. The HSE know where the responsibility and the power sits!
redken  
#18 Posted : 30 September 2013 11:48:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
redken

quote=bluefingers]As Health and Safety Advisor in a SME, reporting to the director who has responsibility for Health and Safety, am I at risk of prosecution if anything goes wrong? Should I be insured against this eventually?

If a court decides you have broken the law then you can be prosecuted and you can not insure against that. But in your position it would be extremely unlikely that you personally would be prosecuted as a consequence of your advice.
Don't let Frank put you off your lunch.
Zimmy  
#19 Posted : 30 September 2013 12:54:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

I'm employed as panel technician/H&S Supervisor. The problem I have is that they, the company, do not let me visit our sites.... to inspect our teams re electrical installations etc.

I have noted this in emails to the directors and I do NOT now consider safe site work down to me. If the directors et al won't let me out of the workshop how can I be held responsible for safety? My little brain is in a tizzzzzzz The site managers/foremen do not have any H&S qualifications or any training relating to RA etc. Happy days

To be honest, I'm sick to the back teeth with it all.

Zimmy  
#20 Posted : 30 September 2013 12:57:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Hills.... I'll send a linkedin message tonight if I may. I need to sort this out .....

Rob
ctd167  
#21 Posted : 30 September 2013 13:15:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ctd167

My director with responsability for H&S whinges all the time that i copy him in to ALL emails on this subject, even when i explained my reasoning, he still kicked up.................but i still copy him in, its the only way to ensure he is 'in the know' and cant say otherwise.
DFH  
#22 Posted : 01 October 2013 09:36:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DFH

I don't think an employed H&S Advisor has much to worry about. However, I do think IOSH could provide a very useful service for its members if it offered legal representation (insurance?) in the event of an IOSH member being in some sort of dispute with their employer.
Our Code of Practice infers a degree of independence on our part (employee first?), but many of us will have a contract of employment (employer first?) which could create a problem.
David Bannister  
#23 Posted : 01 October 2013 10:08:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

dfh, probably the most persuasive argument for being a member of a Trade Union. It's mostly not placards, marches and picket lines!
lwthesm  
#24 Posted : 01 October 2013 12:14:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
lwthesm

I think David is probably right. I am employed as an H&S Supervisor and am also a union member. My union gives legal help (not just work related) and public liability insurance among other things. They also understand the business I'm in. There is no conflict with my employer as most of the workforce are unionised - 3 unions are recognised in our company. Being a union member gives me peace of mind. I've been a member for well over 30yrs and never once waved a plackard or stood on a picket line!
John M  
#25 Posted : 01 October 2013 12:31:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

dfh wrote:
I don't think an employed H&S Advisor has much to worry about. However, I do think IOSH could provide a very useful service for its members if it offered legal representation (insurance?) in the event of an IOSH member being in some sort of dispute with their employer.
Our Code of Practice infers a degree of independence on our part (employee first?), but many of us will have a contract of employment (employer first?) which could create a problem.


One of the reasons I remain a paid up Union member. I get much more assurance and indeed benefit entitlement from my Union membership

Jon
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.