Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
bluefingers  
#1 Posted : 30 September 2013 12:18:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

Why is the inspection period for air receivers and LEV systems 14 months? It seems to be an unusual time period. More curious than concerned.
walker  
#2 Posted : 30 September 2013 12:28:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

I think its one of life's mysteries. My assumtion is; annual test plus a couple of months grace for those who forgot or time needed to get the inspector in. I always advise an annual test so as to avoid sailing too close to the wind.
redken  
#3 Posted : 30 September 2013 12:54:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
redken

http://www.hse.gov.uk/re...rr_pdf/2002/crr02429.pdf The requirement to thoroughly examine equipment dates back to the introduction of steam power into factories. There were a large number of explosions of steam boilers and it was found that a legal requirement to have the boilers regularly examined by a competent person did dramatically reduce the number of these accidents. The examination of the boilers meant that the factory had to be closed down whilst this work was carried out and this normally only occurred during the Easter holidays. Because Easter was a moveable feast the maximum time set for the intervals between thorough examinations was chosen as 14 months to accommodate the holiday period. It was then recognised that there were also a large number of accidents on cranes and other defined types of lifting machines and so a similar requirement was introduced with a similar time scale
m  
#4 Posted : 30 September 2013 12:57:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

I have always understood there were two schools of thought on this; one of which is described by Redken below - the movement of Easter. The other school goes for the 14 month plan pushing the check back through all of the seasons as the years pass by therefore checking in a range of temperatures, etc. Take your pick!
bluefingers  
#5 Posted : 30 September 2013 13:07:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

It probably emerged from the old boiler regs and said something like 'safe to use for a period of 12 months and must be reinspected within 60 days of that last day'. Pure guess, hope someone answers to satisfy my curiosity.
bluefingers  
#6 Posted : 30 September 2013 13:10:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

Thanks Redken and m, I posted my last post before your two comments were uploaded.
Sweep  
#7 Posted : 30 September 2013 16:55:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Sweep

m is correct. LEVs are tested at 14 month intervals to test under different weather conditions.
bluefingers  
#8 Posted : 30 September 2013 21:10:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bluefingers

Thanks guys, curiosity satisfied, until the next time.
Clairel  
#9 Posted : 02 October 2013 09:54:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

I'm confused. LEV is required to be tested at intervals not exceeding 14 months but the period of inspection for air receivers is determined by the competent person. Can't say I've known it to be 14 months, 12 months seems to be more normal. But I have not idea why LEV uses the 14 month criteria.
Best31480  
#10 Posted : 02 October 2013 12:23:38(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Best31480

Sweep is correct LEV comes under COSHH and has 14 month inspection intervals to tak into account the varying weather conditions as extraction operates differently on a hot day as opposed to a cold one. The air recivers must have a written scheme for the periodic examination by a competent person, this will determine how often the examination takes place. In my experience this is normally every 24 months for new equipment and is reduced as it gets older.
pseudonym  
#11 Posted : 02 October 2013 13:16:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

For what its worth, my money is on the Easter suggestion. If they really wanted to test LEV through all weather conditions the requirement would be for exactly 14 months (or 11, 13 or some othe number not equal to 12), as it stands the requirement is for testing at an interval not exceeding 14 months (I'm sure someone will quote the exact phraseology used)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.