Rank: New forum user
|
Is it legisltaion to have factory over head gantry cranes loewered to the ground and serviced every ten years .
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
That would be a no then. However, that doesn't make it a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Providing the Crane is serviced ,maintained and thoroughly examined by a competent engineer at the correct intervals, why should you try to lower it to the ground every 10 years.
Still a No
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It comes under LOLER so should have a scheme of examination see reg 9 of LOLER http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l113.pdfSo I can't see a need for this ten year operation - unless your competent person says so............
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree with all of the above... I assume that it was commissioned into use and has a safe working load clearly marked?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sorry to disagree with the No's but the answer is maybe!
Depending upon the age of the crane and type it might require beam deflection tests to check that the SWL remains the same.
Beam deflection tests require the beam to be on the ground so that the point loads can be applied and the beam deflection measured.
Your competent person will advise.
J
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
jontyjohnston wrote:Sorry to disagree with the No's but the answer is maybe!
Depending upon the age of the crane and type it might require beam deflection tests to check that the SWL remains the same.
Beam deflection tests require the beam to be on the ground so that the point loads can be applied and the beam deflection measured.
Your competent person will advise.
J That seems a little odd. The deflection of a beam for a given load depends on its geometry and Young's modulus. The Young's modulus of the beam will not degrade with time, so the deflection under load should remain the same indefinitely. Or is the competent person asking for this as there is insufficient evidence of the correct identification of the SWL in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
jontyjohnston wrote:Sorry to disagree with the No's but the answer is maybe!
Depending upon the age of the crane and type it might require beam deflection tests to check that the SWL remains the same.
Beam deflection tests require the beam to be on the ground so that the point loads can be applied and the beam deflection measured.
Your competent person will advise.
J Do you have a referrence for this test? A British Standard etc. Never heard of this requirement. Also if the beam of the crane is on the ground, how can it deflect under load. I assume its supported on something? I agree with Jane. The deflection can be calculated using the Engineers Bending Equation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jane Blunt wrote: That seems a little odd. The deflection of a beam for a given load depends on its geometry and Young's modulus. The Young's modulus of the beam will not degrade with time, so the deflection under load should remain the same indefinitely.
Unless there's been significant corrosion of the members, in which case both stiffness (ie deflection) and strength would be affected. But if it is that badly corroded, I'd expect alarm bells to be ringing about the standard of maintenance anyway. Even if it were necessary to do a deflection test, I'm not sure why you wouldn't do it in-situ: you'd either use an optical level or a laser beam. Doing it with the beam in-situ requires work at height, but in this case the hazards associated with that (if planned properly) are not necessarily greater than the hazards with lowering the crane beam and then raising it again. I'd certainly consider doing it in place.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am glad I did not ask a simple question like this
Is it legislation to have factory over head gantry cranes lowered to the ground and serviced every ten years .
I feel as if I am on a Nuclear physicist site.
Ta Alex
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
alexmccreadie13 wrote:I am glad I did not ask a simple question like this
Is it legislation to have factory over head gantry cranes lowered to the ground and serviced every ten years .
I feel as if I am on a Nuclear physicist site.
Quote:That would be a no then Quote:I can't see a need for this ten year operation Quote:I agree with all of the above
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.