Rank: Forum user
|
We recently had a madical audit carried out on one of our MODU's at the request of the client. The audit went fairly well but one of the findings was:
"No occupational health/health & wellbeing/healthy lifestyle initiatives in place"
The potential impact of this: "Not fulfilling duty of care or HSE requirements"
I am unable to find any requirement that states that we must have this in place. I know it is best practice and i will be making improvements in this area but when challenged, the auditor was even unable to answer where the requirement was.
Anybody come accross this before?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
"No occupational health/health & wellbeing/healthy lifestyle initiatives in place" Who carried out this audit and what was it based on. There is no general legal requirement for OH provision and certainly no requirement for healthy life-style initiatives. This wasn’t organised by a company that supply’s this sort of thing was it? The only thing that you need OH for as far as H&S in concerned is the provision of health surveillance under Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations and other regs. The other things are “nice to haves” not legal requirements.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There is a requirement to carry out Occupational Health Checks under COSHH Regulations if you are using substances that fall into the requirement.
I would investigate this requirement based on your personal circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The audit was carried out in March and i joined the company in May so i wasn't involved in it at all. It has been thrown on my desk as the client are asking where we are with the findings.
To be honest, the audit report is awful. I understand the health surveillance requirements under COSHH but i think what he is getting at is that we should be carrying out health promotions and healthy living initiatives and providing things like eyesight tests, cholestoral checks etc. I will look into doing this to some degree but i am going to throw this back at them and tell me where the requirement is.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ah, the Big Brother approach to h&s
As we all know your company only has to meet it's Statutory obligations in terms of h&s.
Anything else is a bonus/at your discretion
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Before you throw it back it is worth a little look at the offshore occupation health initiatives if you don't have it already... There is a general opinion that due to an increase in age profile and bariatric (larger) employees offshore, that OH programs will reduce the impact on the medical support...same as onshore really. Targeting cardiac arrest, diabetes and obesity. http://books.hse.gov.uk/...alogueCode=9780717608867That is of course assuming that MODU is Mobile Offshore Drilling unit and not Mighty 'Ole Down Under...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Steve
Unless your offshore site is occupied by practioners of the branch of medicine that deals with the causes, prevention, and treatment of obesity. Then you misuse the word bariatric
Otherwise I think you have hit the nail on the head regarding the auditor's comments
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
We have 12 Wellness initiatives per year, usually around a general topic, this month (Mo-Vember) is Mens Health, last month was Breast Cancer Awareness.
I like this because if you follow the health charities they do have tons of free information that can be printed off from their websites.
There is also an element of funraising too, so its not all one way.
I have OH/Wellness targets to meet, regardless of being law etc, my company says do and I, as an employee just get on with it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
walker wrote:Steve
Unless your offshore site is occupied by practioners of the branch of medicine that deals with the causes, prevention, and treatment of obesity. Then you misuse the word bariatric
Otherwise I think you have hit the nail on the head regarding the auditor's comments Good google....we also use it to describe PT who are defined as having a BMI of over 30 Even better google... http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr573.htm
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Not law.
Some auditors can be idiots at times.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Clairel
the auditors may be daft... but is there not usually a continous improvement clause in most of the standards... so that means whilst the law stays still then one's standards should ever rise...?
It used to drive me mad when UKAS came out and audited us against ISO17020 and 17025 - (asbestos surveying and lab) We had to have the 17025 to trade and obviously there is a cost implication if the next lab is not being hit with the same auditors whim as they do not have that cost. At least in this case someone volunteered to have OSHAS or similar?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
What were they auditing you against?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am not saying that I agree with the auditors, but let us not forget that it is the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, the opening statement saying: "An Act to make further provision for securing the health, safety and welfare of persons at work...."
Under general duties the Act states: "2 (1) - It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees"
Note the inclusion of 'welfare'.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree with several points made in other postings, viz: - To align with the ISO approach, an audit should be designed to aid and encourage the auditee towards 'continual improvement'. To plan audits just to check compliance with applicable legislation makes no sense for any professional who truly believes that 'good OSH is good business'. - The standard(s) against which you are being audited should always be documented, ideally before the audit but, if not, in the resulting report. Comments and recommendations shouldn't just be opinion-based, as perhaps was the case quoted? - When my organisation carries out health-related audits offshore we do expect to see suitable broadly-based health promotion activities and use the awards standard from Healthy Working Lives, Scotland as our standard. Of course some organisations will choose not to do much, and there's no relevant UK legislation but that doesn't change our audit standard. And of course you don't have to be in Scotland, or to actually apply to HWL for an award in order to use their standard!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Poor old auditor - the key to the answer surely must be to find out the criteria of the audit - an audit isnt always based on legal requirements. Many businesses are audited against client/sector requirements which can be away above legal compliance. Legal doesnt always mean safe.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.