Rank: New forum user
|
I am looking for your experiences on managing employees who are lone/remote workers. We have around 110 staff who are service engineers who enter into customer premises on their own (customer present) to carry out service work. They are provided with a company vehicle and drive alone to each customers premises. On an adverage day they drive around 150 miles.
Are they classed as lone workers? Has anyone experienced anything simular and what controls did you put in place to ensure safety?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Your service engineers are classed as lone workers, and they can not be put at any more risk because of the lone working activity, i.e. It is not a higher risk because of the lone working than if they where not lone working. Carry out a risk assessment in to the work they are carrying out, is it safe to complete on their own, hazards, tasks etc... There are many systems available that can be used, from budding up with mobile phones, checking in and out of locations, gps technology, call centre manned response devices (iDenticom or similar product). Do you use trackers in the vans?
I have a host of info if you wish to PM me
Peter
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It’s actually up to you whether you class them as lone workers or not and what if any additional precautions are need.
Some would argue that they are not if there are other people about who could provide assistance. For example, I drive between our various different sites, during the day, on roads that are reasonably ‘populated’. If something ‘goes wrong’ then I have a reasonable expectation that others will render me with some assistance. In reality, this is what tends to happen. Am I a ‘lone worker’? I am clearly on my own in the car, but there are plenty of other people about. Is the risk significantly greater because I am driving on my own rather than having someone ‘ride shotgun’? In many cases I suggest not.
While you can put in place various procedures and ‘lone worker’ devices, in many cases lone workers WILL nevertheless potentially be at greater risk than if they weren’t lone working. The risk still needs to be managed SOFARP but I suggest that sometimes the risk is inevitably and unavoidably greater.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There are 2 issues here - remote workers (and I would class your engineers remote when fdriving) and how are they managed and then lone workers - which I would class the engineers to be when they are entering a property and how they are managed and safety is maintained - how do you manage known risks and information on properties, for example agressive dogs, agressive customers or neighbours etc
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree with canopener.
In the situation described there may not be any significant lone working risks. On the other hand there might be if the work really needs two people to do it safely or if there is a need for first aid cover or a rescue plan that the customer doesn't provide, or if the customers are aggrieved domestic customers who may turn violent.
There is no legal requirement to reduce the risks to the same level as if they weren't working alone (reasonable practicability is all there is here) although that may be the policy in Peter's organisation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
mream
PM with your email and I will forward you our Lone Working protocols which might give you some ideas.
J
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
canopener wrote:It’s actually up to you whether you class them as lone workers or not and what if any additional precautions are need.
Hi Indg73 gives guidance on who should be classed as lone workers, and what you need to consider when carrying out your risk assessment. Basically, you need to consider if they worker can deal with the risks of the job and the normal and foreseeable emergencies that arise from it. Download the guidance and have a look. If you follow it you should be OK.
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Coming from a plant hire background where we had 330 service engineers and 110 delivery drivers I can say that over a 5 year timespan we only had 3 incidents involving lone workers and in all cases it was due to negligence on the part of the lone worker. What we did in managing the lone working was a phone buddy system where if someone was on their own for more than 1 hour they had to phone a designated person. We also restricted the activities to lower risk, eg. no working at height, no hotworks, drivers to load up the previous afternoon when other staff were available etc. As also said, there are companies that can supply monitoring services and there are smart phones that can detect if someone stops moving and alerts the monitor.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.