Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Frank Hallett  
#1 Posted : 16 January 2014 13:06:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

It appears that GMC Police are to be charged for the shooting of an unarmed suspect March 3 2012 under an unspecified Section of HSWA rather than a convenional Criminal Law case being brought! The initial story is in the Guardian but probable available across the media. Any thoughts? Frank Hallett
Moderator 2  
#2 Posted : 16 January 2014 13:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Moderator
Moderator 2

Forum users - please be careful to avoid contravening this forum rule: 8. Discussion of potential or actual legal proceedings is prohibited on the public discussion forums. 8.1. Public inquiries, including where IOSH is a party to the inquiry, may be discussed on the Members’ Forum. 8.2. Information that has been intentionally released, for example to alert others to a particular hazard or fact, can also be discussed in the IOSH Members’ Forum. Thank you
Frank Hallett  
#3 Posted : 16 January 2014 13:15:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

Many thanks to the Moderator for the timely reminder and also to be aware of the requirement not to discuss this case specifically as it is sub-judice. However, it would be interesting to explore how such a use of HSWA legislation might be used in such an event as has occurred - keeping it hypothetical and not the specific parties in this case.. Frank hallett
Canopener  
#4 Posted : 16 January 2014 13:41:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Indeed, there have been a number of recent successful prosecutions for contempt for such!
colinreeves  
#5 Posted : 16 January 2014 13:51:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
colinreeves

More information already in the public domain at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25759909
PH2  
#6 Posted : 16 January 2014 14:23:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PH2

I agree with the moderator on this one. Given the limited number of previous prosecutions for this type of incident under the HASAWA, it would be difficult to discuss the implications in abstract terms at this stage (even in the members areas forum) without breaching the forum rules. PH2
RayRapp  
#7 Posted : 16 January 2014 14:29:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

It is not so unusual to prosecute a police force with HSWA following a serious incident, as the above link confirms with the de Menezes case. However, if I am allowed to comment on the prosecution and not the case, I do not believe HSWA was intended to be used in such a way and I would also question that it's 'in the public interest'.
A Kurdziel  
#8 Posted : 16 January 2014 15:18:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

They use the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 as there is no other (statute) law that specifically covers the issues raised by this case.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.