Rank: New forum user
|
A colleague of mine called me on Friday to seek my opinion regarding an accident that occurred at his place of work. A member of his Staff was carrying out normal duties which involved the feeding of raw material for further processing. Whilst walking to the machine hopper the Operator found himself on the floor sustaining a knee injury requiring Hospital treatment Upon further investigation the root cause of the accident was attributed to the Operator having an unknown medical condition which caused him to faint.
It is very likely that the injury sustained will incapacitate the injured person over 7 days and subsequently the question I was
asked was" should it be reported to the HSE".
My advice was that if the injured person is incapacitated for over 7 days the accident must be reported to the HSE under the RIDDOR. Do you agree with the advice that I gave my colleague
Best Regards
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If the fainting and collapse are as a result of an underlying medical condition that is unrelated to work, then no it doesn't need to be reported.
Just because it happened at work doesn't make it reportable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
But it was an accident at work so reportable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You may want to consider if the workplace / work load contributed to the incident. ie was it excessively hot etc.
Before you can make a decision.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am with the non-report camp if there were no external factors involved and it was purely contributed by an external condition.
A Company I know reported an over seven day injury when the operator tripped on the stairs ruining their three years without an LTI. In this instance he was just clumsy - footwear in good condition, lighting good, no defects, slip hazards on stairs, not rushing through work pressure, not carrying anything etc. I would not have reported this like I would not report yours.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Once again, the answer is in the published guidance as already indicated. The guidance includes more detail about what counts as work-related so I suggest reviewing that part of it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Based on information given I would say No as not work related.
Just because it happens at work does not make it work related, as Kate advises read the guidance (L73) and decide based on that and the detail you have as to how the incident occured. It incident does not meet criteria of the three key factors then in my opinion not reportable
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.