Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
sutty  
#1 Posted : 27 January 2014 16:05:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sutty

My employers has asked me to look into forming a H&S committee. We are an SME all based in 1 office with periodical site visits, no employees have any union affiliation and nobody has formally requested we form this group. As far as I see it, a committee would be taking it a bit far due to the nature of our business and the associated risks. if the MD is keen to have representation of the workforce can we not simply ask for a couple of volunteers to act as representatives, passing on any concerns to the director responsible for H&S thus giving them a voice on the board or, are we required to go the whole hog.
achrn  
#2 Posted : 27 January 2014 16:50:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

I don't understand why a couple of volunteer representatives and a director would not be a H&S committee. We are slightly larger but our H&S committee is just that - though we have a few geographical locations so have at least one person from each office, and we have two directors and the MD on the committee. We have about a dozen people total, but anything more than 2 people I'd call a committee. (We are office based, occasional site attendance, no union, no formal request from workforce.)
sutty  
#3 Posted : 27 January 2014 17:02:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sutty

achrn My view was that an actual committee would be more formal, requiring documented roles and responsibilities, scheduled and minuted meetings etc. If we can keep it less formal I think I will get more input.
Kate.  
#4 Posted : 27 January 2014 17:52:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Kate.

There's nothing to stop you consulting informally in the way you suggest. Although keeping a record doesn't sound as if it would be that onerous, so what's the problem?
achrn  
#5 Posted : 28 January 2014 10:22:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

sutty wrote:
achrn My view was that an actual committee would be more formal, requiring documented roles and responsibilities, scheduled and minuted meetings etc. If we can keep it less formal I think I will get more input.
I would schedule meetings (in my organisation, if you want three or more people in one place at the same time, you need to schedule any meeting), and I would always minute any meeting (that's more than exchanging a few words as you pass on the staircase) anyway. We don't have documented roles beyond that I chair the meeting. We do have a terms of reference but they basically just say the committee reports to the board and constitutes at least one person from each office, at least two board directors, at least one person from our rail group (because rail has lots of its own safety rules) and one from our geotechnics group (because they do more lone working and working where there isn't a site and contractor already established).
A Kurdziel  
#6 Posted : 28 January 2014 10:22:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Informal is great for establishing a dialogue and getting information etc. But when it comes to actually getting something done there is nothing like an action plan from a Health and Safety committee (in my experience anyway)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.