Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
clegg1966  
#1 Posted : 04 February 2014 14:53:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clegg1966

Hello. I am after some guidance about the supply of prescription safety eyewear for roofing employees. I am aware of the VDU regs but there is some confusion if we have to supply prescription safety eyewear for our builders. We expect them to wear safety eyewear when working and an enquiry has come to me regarding people who wear prescription glasses. HR have not been helpful unfortunately. I am of the belief if staff have to wear safety glasses we should pay for prescription safety glasses if needed. I welcome your thoughts.
A Kurdziel  
#2 Posted : 04 February 2014 15:13:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

If your risk assessed assessment says that they need to wear safety glasses you need to provide them. If the guys cannot wear over-glasses then prescription safely glasses are one way to go. So yes you need to provide them with something fit for purpose but it need not be prescription safety glasses.
Frank Hallett  
#3 Posted : 04 February 2014 16:41:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

Hi clegg - unfortunate; no relation? AK is correct in his admirably concise response. Frank Hallett
bob youel  
#4 Posted : 05 February 2014 08:44:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

AK is correct as FH has said
A Kurdziel  
#5 Posted : 05 February 2014 09:07:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Gosh ywo people have agreed with me... that's a first!
PIKEMAN  
#6 Posted : 05 February 2014 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PIKEMAN

Make that three. Another point is about bifocal safety specs - in the past organisations I have worked for would only pay for single vision safety specs - if people wanted bifocals or varifocals, then they had to pay the extra.
paul.skyrme  
#7 Posted : 05 February 2014 10:06:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

The above is quite correct, including the bit about single vision only to the best of my knowledge. Just a real life example of provision of prescription safety specs though... A previous employer of mine was in a bit of a predicament, they wanted me to have prescription safety eye wear, which was fine, single vision, which was fine, until I asked them which distance they wanted me to see at, far, middle or reading? They then came back with did I need them for all 3 distances and why. Well, when walking around premises with a blanket eye protection requirement, I need far vision specs. When working on machinery at say arms length, in such an environment I would need specs for that distance, and the same again for close vision. The next question was why did I need different prescriptions. So I sent them a prescription from my optician, and a letter explaining that my eyes do not accommodate (focus) for different distances, they are set focus at reading distance and I still need corrective lenses for reading. Why was the next question. 2 cataract operations with lens implants is the reason for the fixed focus. The correction requirement for reading is due to the surgery having distorted my eyeball. So, they decided that I should have varifocals, as my optician did not recommend over glasses. Just a point to illustrate that not everything is as cut and dried as it may seem. Generous employer, or practical, I would guess that one pair of varifocals would be less than 3 pairs of fixed, also,what would have been the scenario be in the event of an injury whilst changing glasses in a "hazardous" environment?...
Frank Hallett  
#8 Posted : 05 February 2014 10:26:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

Admirably explained Paul S - textbook stuff!. Frank Hallett
Mick Noonan  
#9 Posted : 05 February 2014 10:26:50(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mick Noonan

The only thing I would add is to assess the ammount of time the person will be wearing eye protection. Per day/week/year. If the duration is short to medium term then overglasses might be the way forward. However, if the duration is significant then you have a duty to provide prescription glasses. Do an assessment, that way you can show that the decision was justified, one way or another. Mick
paul.skyrme  
#10 Posted : 05 February 2014 10:32:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

A genuine story & true though Frank H! I know, because I was, that boy! (In the voice of Max Boyce, for those in the know!) ;)
jay  
#11 Posted : 05 February 2014 20:10:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

Also, prescription safety glasses do not cover for all types of impacts --only to a limit.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.