Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Steve e ashton  
#1 Posted : 26 February 2014 10:38:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve e ashton

There have been threads on here about whether it is wise or necessary to train staff to recover people from lifts that get stuck (or whether to wait for the professional lift engineers...). Article in todays news may put the discussion in to focus:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/new...burgh-east-fife-26344369

Steve
johnld  
#2 Posted : 26 February 2014 13:22:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
johnld

I think if anything this demonstrates that if you are to use your own staff to carry out lift releases you must be able to demonstrate that they have received training.

I don’t think this case sets a precedent that your own staff cannot carry out this task.

On my campus we had over 40 lifts operating 24/7 and it was simply impracticable to rely on the lift company or the fire brigade.

All staff who would carry out releases were trained and only those staff had access to the release keys
matelot1965  
#3 Posted : 26 February 2014 16:07:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
matelot1965

I guess you could argue that lifts come under the confined space regulations also
David Bannister  
#4 Posted : 26 February 2014 17:16:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

matelot1965 wrote:
I guess you could argue that lifts come under the confined space regulations also


You could indeed argue that but I doubt that you will find many to accept your argument. The Regs are quite clear on "reasonably foreseeable specified risk", none of which are likely to be present in many lifts.
Frank Hallett  
#5 Posted : 26 February 2014 17:28:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Frank Hallett

Matelot & David B - whilst a lift may not normally be considered as a CS, the sump or well at the base of any lift shaft should certainly be considered as a potentially hazardous CS.

Other than that, I would suport Johnld's view.

Frank Hallett
matelot1965  
#6 Posted : 26 February 2014 19:49:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
matelot1965

David Bannister wrote:
matelot1965 wrote:
I guess you could argue that lifts come under the confined space regulations also


You could indeed argue that but I doubt that you will find many to accept your argument. The Regs are quite clear on "reasonably foreseeable specified risk", none of which are likely to be present in many lifts.



Hows about this reasonably foreseeable specified risk if you are trapped in a lift the loss of consciousness of any person at work arising from an increase in body temperature
achrn  
#7 Posted : 27 February 2014 07:55:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

matelot1965 wrote:

Hows about this reasonably foreseeable specified risk if you are trapped in a lift the loss of consciousness of any person at work arising from an increase in body temperature


It's not reasonably foreseeable.

Even if trapped in a lift for a considerable length of time, it's not going to get dangerously hot in there.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.