Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
michaelt  
#1 Posted : 14 March 2014 13:51:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
michaelt

We import machinery and our supplier is proposing changing the LOTO from a physical one to a password. Does anyone have any similar experience of this and can offer advice
A Kurdziel  
#2 Posted : 14 March 2014 13:56:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

LOTO is?
DavidGault  
#3 Posted : 14 March 2014 14:35:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DavidGault

Using passwords with lock out tag out seems tantamount to giving everyone the keys to the locks and that would not be a good idea. Imagine someone locking off the process with a password and while they are still on the job someone else comes along with the same password and restarts the process. Unless I have missed somethign that does not sound right to me.
Lawlee45239  
#4 Posted : 14 March 2014 14:40:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

A Kurdziel wrote:
LOTO is?
Lock Out Tag Out
Roundtuit  
#5 Posted : 14 March 2014 15:41:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

You did not mention where the machinery is being imported from or what you do with it after importation (use or distribute) - either way I would suggest that equipment using a password held in a processor unit would fail the essential safety requirements necessary for the equipment to carry a CE mark. Passwords (like keys for Fork Lift Trucks etc.) end up being shared and defeat the designers intended purpose - unfortunately consideration of the "human" element is often over looked. The other consideration is if the equipment can be powered / operated whilst by-passing the control unit? From personal experience designing handling systems around the time CE marking came in individual components could be operated without the controller (even with a PILZ safety relay) as part of a maintenance diagnostics system.
Roundtuit  
#6 Posted : 14 March 2014 15:41:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

You did not mention where the machinery is being imported from or what you do with it after importation (use or distribute) - either way I would suggest that equipment using a password held in a processor unit would fail the essential safety requirements necessary for the equipment to carry a CE mark. Passwords (like keys for Fork Lift Trucks etc.) end up being shared and defeat the designers intended purpose - unfortunately consideration of the "human" element is often over looked. The other consideration is if the equipment can be powered / operated whilst by-passing the control unit? From personal experience designing handling systems around the time CE marking came in individual components could be operated without the controller (even with a PILZ safety relay) as part of a maintenance diagnostics system.
A Kurdziel  
#7 Posted : 14 March 2014 16:43:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Lawlee45239 wrote:
A Kurdziel wrote:
LOTO is?
Lock Out Tag Out
Thanks Lawlee What’s to stop people making copies of physical keys?
godscrasher  
#8 Posted : 14 March 2014 17:01:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
godscrasher

Off topic there really needs to be a policy of using abbreviations. It has been said before in other posts that we are a part of a professional organisation and not everyone on this forum is aware of the abbreviations used. I think we either put the meaning next to the abbreviation or we have an Urban Safety dictionary so people can look up the meanings. MODS?
Roundtuit  
#9 Posted : 14 March 2014 17:22:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Even worse than copying keys at the local shoe repairer - I once worked for an employer where a supervisor had the stores man order him a set of duplicate Castel Lock (other providers available) keys! LOTO is not only about the equipment but the trained managed practices and documented procedures
Roundtuit  
#10 Posted : 14 March 2014 17:22:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Even worse than copying keys at the local shoe repairer - I once worked for an employer where a supervisor had the stores man order him a set of duplicate Castel Lock (other providers available) keys! LOTO is not only about the equipment but the trained managed practices and documented procedures
stevie40  
#11 Posted : 15 March 2014 22:29:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

Speaking as an insurance surveyor, I would not be happy with a password controlled LOTO system. The only way it could possibly work would be if all staff held their own password and only that password could be used to release the Lock Out. What would you do if you had multiple maintenance staff working on the machine? Multiple passwords? I suspect not. Finally, the big red safety hasp with multiple padlocks dangling from it is a good, clear indication (the tag out) that the machine is out of service.
Kate.  
#12 Posted : 16 March 2014 08:50:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Kate.

I agree that it sounds like a bad idea for the reasons already given. I disagree that there should be a policy against using abbreviations. The question being asked can only be answered by someone who is familiar with LOTO. Someone who doesn't know what LOTO stands for isn't going to be familiar with it so nothing is lost by them not understanding the question as they couldn't have answered it anyway.
A Kurdziel  
#13 Posted : 17 March 2014 09:50:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Kate. wrote:
I agree that it sounds like a bad idea for the reasons already given. I disagree that there should be a policy against using abbreviations. The question being asked can only be answered by someone who is familiar with LOTO. Someone who doesn't know what LOTO stands for isn't going to be familiar with it so nothing is lost by them not understanding the question as they couldn't have answered it anyway.
Ah but Kate… I don’t work in manufacturing and I have not heard of the term LOTO( which according to another thread is an Americanism anyway) but we do use equipment with keys on it ( autoclaves for example) so this is an topic that might interest me. I always thought that this is the point of the forum so that H&S professionals from different backgrounds can share( steal) ideas with each other.
PIKEMAN  
#14 Posted : 17 March 2014 10:48:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PIKEMAN

On the subject of acronyms and abbreviations, let's think outside the box. The purpose of these posts is not just to solve problems and get opinions, but surely to increase forum user's experience and knowledge? IMHO abbreviations should be banned if they are not defined.
David Bannister  
#15 Posted : 17 March 2014 13:31:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Abbreviations are a good way of excluding those who don't know but want to offer advice anyway. For those with an interest it is often quite easy to pick up the meaning by reading through the thread or using an internet search and then using a little brainpower.
stillp  
#16 Posted : 21 March 2014 14:14:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stillp

Pikeman wrote:
IMHO abbreviations should be banned if they are not defined.
Oh, the irony!
stillp  
#17 Posted : 21 March 2014 14:25:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stillp

LOTO is often applied to machine isolators. There is no device known that will achieve isolation by using a password. However a password is quite often used to identify an authorised person and allow them to make a brief intervention at a machine, e.g. for setting or adjustment purposes. It needs careful management, but so does the use of keys.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.