Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
jasonkav  
#1 Posted : 12 May 2014 13:35:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jasonkav

I am carrying out a review of WAH on a multi building site, we have 2 large flat concrete roof areas, 2000m2 each, that have 'lifeline' work restraint systems, the lines pose a trip hazard that is 2metres from the edge the roof edge has a low parapet approx 250mm high, we have a 2m rule regarding access, however i think it looks wrong! access onto the roof is via a permit although i often see individual maintenance operatives working on the roof, well away from the edge, a passive edge protection double handrail is my recommendation for improvement, however i have read HSE roof work guidance and it is not a legal requirement!
peter gotch  
#2 Posted : 13 May 2014 13:21:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Jason In the medium term edge protection might be the cheaper option. Less requirements for certificating ongoing reliability of the lifeline systems.
murray-t  
#3 Posted : 13 May 2014 13:51:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
murray-t

Jason, I worked with a similar issue but our roof was only accessed once a year so a safety harness was all that was required but if the roof is accessed on a regular basis then point out The Work at Height Regulations 2005, 6(3) & 7(1) (a), otherwise it might be more reasonably practicable to use safety harness and lines.
PIKEMAN  
#4 Posted : 13 May 2014 15:53:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PIKEMAN

Another thing to bear in mind is that if you put up handrails they have an ongoing maintenance requirement, after time they will start to rot / rust etc and need checking / painting / testing and so on - if you only go up occasionally them it may not be cost effective.
jasonkav  
#5 Posted : 14 May 2014 09:09:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jasonkav

I must add that the requirement for access onto the 'safe' area of the roof is for A/C units, chiller units 5 seperate units, and the roof incorporates a fire exit route for the plant room itself! the route is dedicated with a non slip footpath across the middle of the roof then down a cat ladder, occupation of the plant room <10 people.
lisar  
#6 Posted : 14 May 2014 14:12:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
lisar

We had an office roof that had been used as a dumping ground for broken office chairs etc. A council inspector came in and said we had to remove them.. Ok , not a problem..But then said as we didnt have a hand rail , we had to have one installed to take down the items safely but then not store anything else up there!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.