Rank: Super forum user
|
Has anyone got any work out of being on the IOSH consultants register? Are there any agenecies out there worth using as a consultant?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
LinkedIn is far better.
Loads of contacts & work via that route.
Never bothered with the IOSH consultants register, from what others say, it appeas to be a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There used to be an IOSH Register of Consultants, that I understand was discontinued after the Occupational Safety and Health Consultants Register (OSHCR) was set up.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have had some enquiries via the OSHCR register but not many. As has been said before, LinkedIn is a good way of generating leads - and it's free :0)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Being on OSHCR resulted in one job as a trainer and numerous emails from companies trying to sell me H&S online/reporting software.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have to agree with Phillip, Farrall, Jay and Jackie - I joined the register when it first started but didn't bother this year as I didn't get a single enquiry!
LinkedIn seems to produce many more leads!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have seen some insurers make it a requirement that if a business uses an external consultant for H&S then they should be on the OSHCR
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Martin#1, if any of my clients were faced with that requirement from an insurer I would be looking very closely at the quality of their other advice and challenging their position.
I doubt that any insurer in the current commercial insurance environment would realistically seek to press this issue, particularly as the Register specifically excludes some highly competent specialists and large numbers of competent consultants have chosen to either abandon their listing or never bothered in the first place.
"Requirements" are very emotive and few insurers now term them as such, preferring the more acceptable term "recommendation" or "risk improvement", waiting until renewal to form an opinion on whether the risk to the insurer's account is sufficiently changed to warrant a change in underwriting terms.
Of course, the immediate requirement to remedy a highly dangerous scenario will always remain valid but this topic hardly falls in to that category.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
quote=David Bannister]Martin#1, if any of my clients were faced with that requirement from an insurer I would be looking very closely at the quality of their other advice and challenging their position.
I doubt that any insurer in the current commercial insurance environment would realistically seek to press this issue, particularly as the Register specifically excludes some highly competent specialists and large numbers of competent consultants have chosen to either abandon their listing or never bothered in the first place.
"Requirements" are very emotive and few insurers now term them as such, preferring the more acceptable term "recommendation" or "risk improvement", waiting until renewal to form an opinion on whether the risk to the insurer's account is sufficiently changed to warrant a change in underwriting terms.
Of course, the immediate requirement to remedy a highly dangerous scenario will always remain valid but this topic hardly falls in to that category. I've seen a couple cases where an insurer has 'pressed' this issue, I don't always agree with it but I have seen it happen
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have had leads via OSHCR but agencies are fine. Choose one that focuses on your area of work and maybe location as some are location specific.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.