Rank: Super forum user 
|
This from http://www.hse.gov.uk/ab...014/020714/pjulb1451.pdf"The 10-week public consultation on the revised CDM Regulations closed on 6 June. Over 1400 responses were received, including a significant number from businesses currently providing Construction Design and Management Consultation (CDM-C) services and from the entertainment and events industry. All the responses are currently being analysed and a paper containing this analysis and recommendations will be provided to the Board on 13 August."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest 
|
CDM works as is Designers do not want the CDMC job so please leave the Regulationns alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Rob,
Thanks for the heads up on this. The outcome should be interesting!
PH2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sorry Ron,
(still no spill chucker!)
PH2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I'm also somewhat puzzled at the reference to "significant number (of responses) from the entertainment and events industry" ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Ron Hunter wrote:This from http://www.hse.gov.uk/ab...014/020714/pjulb1451.pdf"The 10-week public consultation on the revised CDM Regulations closed on 6 June. Over 1400 responses were received, including a significant number from businesses currently providing Construction Design and Management Consultation (CDM-C) services and from the entertainment and events industry. All the responses are currently being analysed and a paper containing this analysis and recommendations will be provided to the Board on 13 August." Afternoon Ron Educate the uninitiated please - that's me. Who or Whom is analysing the responses and will produce recommendations etc. Also, is the analyser's work checked for accuracy / flaws in interpretation - checks and balances (if so by whom) or would this mean the analyses being done twice, therefore the original analyses stands? Actually, I've just thought that the recommendations would allude to false or bad interpretation of the analyses. Rich
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
Ron Hunter wrote:I'm also somewhat puzzled at the reference to "significant number (of responses) from the entertainment and events industry" ? My understanding is that there was a general panic in the events industry that the revision to CDM was a cloak-and-dagger exercise by HSE intent on descending on them all like a tonne of bricks. I think it was partly conspiracy theory / overblown rubbish (a bit like the architects who were proclaiming it was the end of any ability to be creative and all buildings would henceforth be plain rectangular boxes with lots of handrails when CDM first came around), but it presumably woke enough people up that it registered in HSE's response. See, as two examples: http://x-ventureblog.blo...ement-at-events-and.html http://www.lsionline.co....tainment-industry/RPSVPK
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The August HSE Board Meeting on 13th August is expected to have a Board paper highligting the details of the analysis ( by HSE staff-as they do it for ALL consultations) --watch the space! All 2014 HSE Board Meeting details so far at:- http://www.hse.gov.uk/ab...s/hseboard/2014index.htmThe schedule for HSE Board open meetings in 2014 & 2015 is at:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
achrn: thanks for the references, I was blissfully unaware of the concern generated within that Industry!
rich777: Questions for the HSE I suggest. Personally, I suggest the whole exercise is (more or less) a fait accompli. There's a parent Directive to be implemented here - approximately 25 years late!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user 
|
Thanks Ron - we'll watch this space!
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.