Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MrsBlue  
#1 Posted : 16 July 2014 09:43:48(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Morning all A charity owns or leases a few properties. In a 4 bedroom house of multiple occupancy I have been asked why there are no ‘FIRE ACTION’ notices clearly displayed? Why, indeed is there no fire signage of any sort displayed - fire exit signs over front door and back door etc. Are there any special rules for this type of situation. I am aware of fire doors having been installed in the house from the bedrooms and bathroom to the upstairs landing and from all down stairs rooms to the hallway and stairs to form a protected route. Also installed, is a complete fire alarm system with call point, sounder and fire alarm board and detectors in every room including the integral garage - is this necessary or can I remove everything bar the detectors of course? Is there anything else I should consider - I need educating either by you kind folk or informed of any written legislation, or publications etc. Thanks in anticipation. Rich
Farrall900153  
#2 Posted : 16 July 2014 10:37:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Farrall900153

Hi Rich, The Department for Communities and Local Government have published a series of detailed guides on fire safety. I'd suggest you have a look at "Fire Safety Risk Assessment: Sleeping Accommodation" which can be downloaded as a free pdf from: https://www.gov.uk/gover...t-sleeping-accommodation Andy
Martin Rudd  
#3 Posted : 16 July 2014 10:55:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Martin Rudd

The DCLG guide is proably not best place to start for HMOs. Quote below on what it covers. • the common areas of houses in multiple occupation (HMO); Note: HMOs and flats and maisonettes are covered by two pieces of legislation, the Order and the Housing Act 2004. A better start (imho) is http://www.rla.org.uk/do...ORSFSguideApril62009.PDF which is more detailed and specific about HMOs and woudl be used by FB or Housing Authority as indicative of standards to be achieved.
firesafety101  
#4 Posted : 16 July 2014 11:02:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

It seems as if there has been a fire risk assessment carried out, judging by the fire precautions stated, but there is also a requirement for sign/notices etc. so have a look at the fire risk assessment Main Findings, if you can locate it? It doesn't matter what regulations are used there must be a fire risk assessment with all recommendations followed.
Martin Rudd  
#5 Posted : 16 July 2014 11:16:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Martin Rudd

Quote from Lacors doc above. Council Housing office will almost certinly lead on fire matters in HMO and use the LACORS doc linked above. Suggest if fire risk assessment is "discovered" you check against the LACORS doc particularly if removing Fire Detection. LACORS doesn't ask for Fire Detection in every room but in common areas. Signage paras below. A.46 The Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006 and The Licensing and Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (Additional Provisions) (England) Regulations 2007 place requirements on the managers of all HMOs (whether licensable or not) in respect of fire safety. The purpose of the management regulations is not to require additional fire safety precautions but to ensure that existing precautions are properly maintained. A.47 Regulation 4 (5) places specific duties on managers of HMOs in respect of fire safety. The manager must ensure that: 􀁳 all means of escape from fire in the HMO are kept free from obstruction and maintained in good order and repair; 􀁳 any fire fighting equipment and fire alarms are maintained in good working order; and 􀁳 all notices indicating the location of means of escape from fire are displayed in positions within the HMO that enable them to be clearly visible to the occupiers (unless the HMO has four or fewer occupiers).
Safety Smurf  
#6 Posted : 16 July 2014 11:32:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Hi Rich, Knowing a little of what you do I would ask; are the occupants of these properties under "asssited living" conditions? if so, that makes them somebodys workplace. Addressing it from that point of view will make it easier for you to decide what the requirements are.
MrsBlue  
#7 Posted : 16 July 2014 12:06:16(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Safety Smurf wrote:
Hi Rich, Knowing a little of what you do I would ask; are the occupants of these properties under "asssited living" conditions? if so, that makes them somebodys workplace. Addressing it from that point of view will make it easier for you to decide what the requirements are.
Morning all Thanks so far for all the help. Safety Smurf - yes you are right there is some supported living with Support Workers in the house or supporting out and about - but only from about 8.00 in the morning to about 7.00 on an evening. So some sort of training for both support workers and occupants needs to be carried out. We took over the property and occupants only within the last year from a LA wjp cannot find/locate upto date records of any fire related issues. Therefore, a fire risk assessment was carried out during which the questions in my original post were asked by the assessor. I asked why a full fire alarm system was installed in what is an ordinary 4 bedroomed house (but falls into the HMO) and the assessor had no answer other than to say perhaps that was the LAs gold plated solution. The support workers don't actually do anything in the house only there to give advice etc - for example, they do not do cleaning or give any kind of physical help to the occupants - almost like a watching brief really. Although the occupants are classed as "adults with learning difficulties" they have achieved independent living. I hope all this is not rambling. Thanks once again Rich
mssy  
#8 Posted : 17 July 2014 10:11:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

I feel (and guidance such as the NHS Firecode supports my view) that you need to be mindful of the fact that these are people's homes when you compile a fire safety strategy and sometimes adjust (NOT reduce) the provision to help promote a domestic ennvironment. With regards to signage, there is no legal requirement for ugly fire action notices (FAN) throughout such a small premises. Instead, in order to communicate the emergency plan, it may be sufficient to provide a FAN in the form of a letter to residents - and perhaps send that out annually. Full sized FANs could be provided in staff only areas. Similarly, the signing of fire exits could - subject to your RA - use smaller less conspicuous signs which fit the domestic feel of the premises, and of course, its rarely required to indicate the usual front door on a small premises. As for the perhaps excessive fire alarm system? Perhaps they were future proofing he premises for a potential change of use in later years, or at least allow that flexibility if required
MrsBlue  
#9 Posted : 17 July 2014 10:56:59(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Thanks mssy - most informative post and the info is very reasonable and actionable. I have found that LAs sometimes do go overboard hence my use of the term "Gold plated solution". As a matter of interest the house concerned could not be used for anything other than domestic living. Thanks once again. Rich
Ian A-H  
#10 Posted : 17 July 2014 12:23:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ian  A-H

Thinking practically (and being mindful these are people's homes) why not paint doors 2 colours? Green on one side, red on the other (or more subtle shades of) - green indicates a route to safety; red indicates the door leads further into the building. The route to safety always goes through a green door, that's what you tell your tenants (and staff). Ian
mssy  
#11 Posted : 17 July 2014 12:59:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

Rich777 wrote:
As a matter of interest the house concerned could not be used for anything other than domestic living.
That may be the case, but if the supported living tenants were replaced with non ambulant or otherwise non independent clients, then perhaps the alarm system would already be suitable. Mind you, what sort of local authority ever plans that far in advance? :)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.