Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
johnmurray  
#1 Posted : 12 September 2014 00:15:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

“ORR’s investigation revealed that Balfour Beatty’s arrangements fell well short of the standard expected for a construction company operating in a high risk environment.”

http://www.constructione...er-worker-suffers-burns/
RLC  
#2 Posted : 16 September 2014 15:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
RLC

BBCL Looks good when it comes to H&S and with their H&S campaigns Zero Harm etc.
I worked as the Client (Network Rail) On the Blackfriars Project being run by BB and where they do seem to put a lot of effort in H&S as in setting up procedures, paperworks, posters, signs etc, they do fall short on controlling it. Where we would be out on site every day having a look around, their own H&S team hardly went out on site, since they stated it was not their job (Actual Statement). It was down to BB managers and supervisors.
I used to go over and watch the poor old subcontractors carrying out RC works, pouring concrete all over themselves when unloading concrete from boat skips, as i approached all the BB engineers would run away.
Their management even stated that it was not down to them to give any agency or sub-contractor workers the correct PPE, if they had none. They were quite happy for these poor souls to work in all weathers with just a High Visibility Vest, no rain or warm clothing at all. (That's over the Themes on a bridge) and boy did it get chilly.
I sorted it by going round the site, and anyone found not having the correct PPE, i would just tell them to go to the canteen and sit there until they got the correct equipment.
After doing that and stopping some of the works it seemed to do the trick.
All of a sudden the stores was open to all.
Jake  
#3 Posted : 17 September 2014 12:40:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jake

RLC, interesting insight!

RLC wrote:
Where we would be out on site every day having a look around, their own H&S team hardly went out on site, since they stated it was not their job (Actual Statement). It was down to BB managers and supervisors.


This is the only part of your post that I disagree with - incorporating H&S management within the operational line accountability and role is, in my opinion/experience, a highly effective manner in which to control H&S within a company.

This leaves the H&S professionals to really add value by creating processes and system, undertaking complex investigations, creating assurance programmes, rather than being a clipboard warrior day-to-day.

What I would assume is in-place (and there's a big risk if not) is that the H&S department carried out audits of H&S management (including the routine checks/balances that the operational line are conducting).
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.