Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
chris42  
#1 Posted : 23 September 2014 16:41:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Do you allow company (not customer) vehicles; cars and vans,to be washed in the company car park, using hose or pressure washer (not waterless system). Environmentally you shouldn't due to the waste being discharged to the drainage system.

But do you ?

Chris
fiesta  
#2 Posted : 23 September 2014 17:06:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fiesta

Hi Chris,

I was aware of this issue but does anyone know where the waste water goes from those hand car washes set up at the road side, or indeed from those mechanical car washes at garages ?????
Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 23 September 2014 18:40:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Definitely an environmentalist question.

Discharges to surface water including potential SVHC (nonylphenols).

Not allowed at site given the only permitted discharges to surface water drains are... Surface waters I.e. rainfall and snow melt.

Why are company vehicles being washed at site? As a company car user I am expected to keep it clean but as Benefit In Kind it is assumed I will clean it as other employees do during my own time at home.

Vehicle fleets in ISO14001 establishments should have as you have considered suitable and sufficient arrangements and certainly not the car park.
Roundtuit  
#4 Posted : 23 September 2014 18:40:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Definitely an environmentalist question.

Discharges to surface water including potential SVHC (nonylphenols).

Not allowed at site given the only permitted discharges to surface water drains are... Surface waters I.e. rainfall and snow melt.

Why are company vehicles being washed at site? As a company car user I am expected to keep it clean but as Benefit In Kind it is assumed I will clean it as other employees do during my own time at home.

Vehicle fleets in ISO14001 establishments should have as you have considered suitable and sufficient arrangements and certainly not the car park.
chris42  
#5 Posted : 23 September 2014 19:02:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Actually I sort of meant the question to be both H&S and Env. Yes it is against the law to discharge without the consent of the water authority or Environment Agency.

I have told the company I work for it is not allowed, but they like me keep seeing people do it as we drive around.

The thing that prompted this was when I noticed a rather muddy vehicle being washed with a power washer in a car park /yard with mud (and stone?) going all over the place with employees and customers giving the process a bit of a wide birth.

I was in a car driving on the other side of the road. Reporting them would have been fruitless as it would have been done and dusted before anyone got there.

This seems to go on everywhere so I thought I would put the issue to everyone.

Is this one of those laws where people tend to be "Pragmatic" about ?

PS I don't have a company car but use a pool car almost exclusively ( pick up and return to site every day, don't take home) which I pay for to go through car wash out of own pocket :0( as it is easier than claiming expenses.

I dare say not many people will own up now.

Chris42


Roundtuit  
#6 Posted : 23 September 2014 20:02:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

And the company policy on liability posted in the carparks? One of the best movers for driving respect for others is if the other car park users are made aware that irresponsible behaviour damaging their cars will not be settled by company liability. Very prevalent if you are unfortunate enough to live in a council area that introduced the car parking tax for workplace spaces.

And regardless of any signage condolence of a "permitted" action makes them liable for any personal injury arising from the activity as premises controller.

Daily Wail scoop - "elf n safety" bans cleaning cars
Roundtuit  
#7 Posted : 23 September 2014 20:02:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

And the company policy on liability posted in the carparks? One of the best movers for driving respect for others is if the other car park users are made aware that irresponsible behaviour damaging their cars will not be settled by company liability. Very prevalent if you are unfortunate enough to live in a council area that introduced the car parking tax for workplace spaces.

And regardless of any signage condolence of a "permitted" action makes them liable for any personal injury arising from the activity as premises controller.

Daily Wail scoop - "elf n safety" bans cleaning cars
Roundtuit  
#8 Posted : 23 September 2014 20:46:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

And to complete now the droid has recharged.

Responsible premises owners have controls in place - think of the booths at commercial car washes and petrol stations.

Another angle is the professional face of the business - how does it look to prospective / existing customers? The only place I would consider such practice's professionally acceptable are dealers forecourts.

That said some activities are wholly unavoidable, and provided they do not obstruct access would be reasonable - repair / replacement of damaged windscreens or tyres to ensure vehicles are roadworthy.
Roundtuit  
#9 Posted : 23 September 2014 20:46:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

And to complete now the droid has recharged.

Responsible premises owners have controls in place - think of the booths at commercial car washes and petrol stations.

Another angle is the professional face of the business - how does it look to prospective / existing customers? The only place I would consider such practice's professionally acceptable are dealers forecourts.

That said some activities are wholly unavoidable, and provided they do not obstruct access would be reasonable - repair / replacement of damaged windscreens or tyres to ensure vehicles are roadworthy.
toe  
#10 Posted : 23 September 2014 21:03:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

I'm struggling a bit with this not being an environmental person.
Have I got this right, we can all take our company cars home and wash them (dirt/contamination down the drain) but we cant do this in our work place (dirt/contamination down the drain).
I understand that an interceptor would be required for commercial car washing, but washing a few company cars in the care park!!

"Not allowed at site given the only permitted discharges to surface water drains are... Surface waters I.e. rainfall and snow melt"

Is this also true for cleaning windows at our workplace?
Roundtuit  
#11 Posted : 23 September 2014 22:09:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

When the car gets cleaned it goes through the local commercial wash at less than £5 a go its not worth the time or personal effort to do it at home plus the benefits of capture, filtration & re-use along with not adding to potential blockage in the highways drain outside my home. Excepting a truly blocked drain, when was the last time you saw a gulley cleaner routinely operating in your street?

Regarding the home or workplace to drain question depends if the employer is truly serious about its environmental impacts and discharge control - considerations typically only extend as far as the works gate, not to the employee at home even if they are in a company vehicle.

Our current commercial window cleaner uses one of those de-ionised water systems from his van (no suds or chamois and with the hose pipe extension no ladders), whereas at home....
Roundtuit  
#12 Posted : 23 September 2014 22:09:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

When the car gets cleaned it goes through the local commercial wash at less than £5 a go its not worth the time or personal effort to do it at home plus the benefits of capture, filtration & re-use along with not adding to potential blockage in the highways drain outside my home. Excepting a truly blocked drain, when was the last time you saw a gulley cleaner routinely operating in your street?

Regarding the home or workplace to drain question depends if the employer is truly serious about its environmental impacts and discharge control - considerations typically only extend as far as the works gate, not to the employee at home even if they are in a company vehicle.

Our current commercial window cleaner uses one of those de-ionised water systems from his van (no suds or chamois and with the hose pipe extension no ladders), whereas at home....
toe  
#13 Posted : 23 September 2014 22:45:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

Excuse my ignorance here. I still don't get it. There is no difference where the cars get washed - home or at work, dirty water down the drain. I could understand if the business was a car hire company, or the gas company with loads of vans being washed - yes corporate responsibility. But a few company cars being washed at work! We do it all the time, company image etc.

So.... Where is the dirt going from your windows? Water from the van (de-ionised) onto the dirty windows, washed off and into the drain!
bigpub  
#14 Posted : 24 September 2014 08:02:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bigpub

I wash mine at home to save the £5. You guys muct be loaded
Maroc  
#15 Posted : 24 September 2014 08:44:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Maroc

Chris,
We used to have a mobile company visit and offer a valet service to the private cars. However our factory is right across the road from a SEPA office and it didn't take long before they put a stop to it.
chris42  
#16 Posted : 24 September 2014 09:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Yes Toe you are correct, a company car cannot be washed in your works car park (without a load of controls and an interceptor etc), but the same type of vehicle can be washed on the driveway of your home. All with the run off going into the same type of drainage system. The guidance is PPG13, for cleaning vehicles (for profit or not).

But its the above point that seems to nark company's. Yes we now do everything correctly, but I still get the odd comment (and I feel they think I'm going overboard), because they also see others doing it.

On the safety side I hadn't thought of the potential damage to other vehicles, I was thinking about flying debris hitting people.

It just becomes a bit irritating when you go around and constantly see other company's doing the wrong thing from H&S working at height etc to Environmental issues. I have started to wonder if I'm not being what was on this site termed "pragmatic".

These company's seem to get away with it and gain advantage over those who do what they should.
A Kurdziel  
#17 Posted : 24 September 2014 09:27:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

We stopped this on our site and send them off to a licenced vehicle wash facility
ExDeeps  
#18 Posted : 24 September 2014 09:30:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ExDeeps

Roundtuit wrote:
Our current commercial window cleaner uses one of those de-ionised water systems from his van (no suds or chamois and with the hose pipe extension no ladders), whereas at home....


Apologies for the thread drift but this comment is one that I find interesting. The hosepipe extension sounds wonderful in respect of removing the need to work at height - BUT - I always wonder what the Manual Handling RA looks like to justify a water fed brush on a long stick being waved around above the operators head. Having had a chat with several of these guys at various locations there is a growing number of WRULD issues coming to the window cleaning party and it's only going to get worse. Maybe ladders (or MEWPS) are a better way forward?

Just a thought,

Jim

walker  
#19 Posted : 24 September 2014 10:10:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Chris42 wrote:

These company's seem to get away with it and gain advantage over those who do what they should.


This is what riles me intensely about so many laws that business has to comply with.
I believe HSE et al should be out there hammering these cowboys and thus create a level playing field for those companies who try to be law abiding.
Andrew W Walker  
#20 Posted : 24 September 2014 10:15:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

walker wrote:
Chris42 wrote:

These company's seem to get away with it and gain advantage over those who do what they should.


This is what riles me intensely about so many laws that business has to comply with.
I believe HSE et al should be out there hammering these cowboys and thus create a level playing field for those companies who try to be law abiding.


Couldn't agree more
aland76  
#21 Posted : 24 September 2014 10:30:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
aland76

Our road drainage system does not run to sewer but through an interceptor and to a soakaway, therefore washing of vehicles on site is banned as any detergents running through the interceptor will potentially form emulsions which allows oils to pass through the system thus causing us a pollution incident and breached consent limits.

We recently had an unknowing member of staff email all employees as a local valeting company were offering cheap car washes / valets on our site while people work, in principle a nice idea but I had to stop this happening for the above reasons.

kevkel  
#22 Posted : 24 September 2014 11:08:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

ExDeeps wrote:
Roundtuit wrote:
Our current commercial window cleaner uses one of those de-ionised water systems from his van (no suds or chamois and with the hose pipe extension no ladders), whereas at home....


Apologies for the thread drift but this comment is one that I find interesting. The hosepipe extension sounds wonderful in respect of removing the need to work at height - BUT - I always wonder what the Manual Handling RA looks like to justify a water fed brush on a long stick being waved around above the operators head. Having had a chat with several of these guys at various locations there is a growing number of WRULD issues coming to the window cleaning party and it's only going to get worse. Maybe ladders (or MEWPS) are a better way forward?

Just a thought,


Exdeeps,
Saw a person washing windows in a city centre location last winter with the rods (Carbon fibre) on third floor on a very windy day (storm force winds) alongside 750volt DC powerlines for a tram! Manual handling risk increases with wind/weather, and obviously electricity and very long conductor in hand! Doubt if there was any risk assessment in place for that.

Jim


kevkel  
#23 Posted : 24 September 2014 11:09:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

sorry that should not have been posted in your quote.
ExDeeps  
#24 Posted : 24 September 2014 13:04:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ExDeeps

kevkel wrote:
Exdeeps,
Saw a person washing windows in a city centre location last winter with the rods (Carbon fibre) on third floor on a very windy day (storm force winds) alongside 750volt DC powerlines for a tram! Manual handling risk increases with wind/weather, and obviously electricity and very long conductor in hand! Doubt if there was any risk assessment in place for that.


Precisely, although the proximity to 750V DC probably eliminated the long term issues of WRULD

Jim

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.