Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
IanDakin  
#1 Posted : 22 August 2014 14:32:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi
Advise would be gratefully received.

A small machine has been imported from the USA. It has a powered drive and moving parts. Therefore, to me, it is covered by the Supply of Machinery Regulations/Machinery Directive.

It did not come with one and the company supplying it state that they do not supply one. They are a small family business.

I can't see any other way of getting a Declaration, even if I had the machine examined by an engineer.

Any ideas (that would help)?

Ian
Lawlee45239  
#2 Posted : 22 August 2014 14:41:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

http://www.hse.gov.uk/wo...claration-conformity.htm

if you cant get the above link, go to HSE, and type in Declaration of Conformity..........

which I'm sure you already looked at

IanDakin  
#3 Posted : 22 August 2014 14:45:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi Lawlee, thanks. I have the HSE advice. The Declaration should come from the manufacturer or their authorized intermediary (normally the importer).

And that is my problem, the guidance does not give scope for an independent test, as far as I can see.

Ian
Lawlee45239  
#4 Posted : 22 August 2014 15:02:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

IanDakin wrote:
Hi Lawlee, thanks. I have the HSE advice. The Declaration should come from the manufacturer or their authorized intermediary (normally the importer).

And that is my problem, the guidance does not give scope for an independent test, as far as I can see.

Ian


Could be taken that where it says 'or the manufacturer's representative' could be taken as an independent?
IanDakin  
#5 Posted : 22 August 2014 15:20:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Unfortunately, any engineer I would employ would not be representing the manufacturer.

"The definition of an Authorised Representative (AR) is someone who has a formal contract with the manufacturer to represent them within the EU. It does not simply mean anyone who happens to purchase and import an item of equipment from outside the EU."
JJ Proudbody  
#6 Posted : 22 August 2014 16:18:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JJ Proudbody

Its a fairly cut and dried issue.

Whoever places the equipment 'on the market' (i.e. who supplies/sells the machine) within the EU is responsible for CE marking and associated paperwork i.e. Declaration of Conformity.

It is illegal to supply unless CE marked.

Unless the machine is in one of the excluded categories? Doubt it from how described so far.
JJ Proudbody  
#7 Posted : 22 August 2014 16:22:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JJ Proudbody

Forgot to add, the machine doesn't necessarily need an independent engineer to check/confirmation of compliance - unless it falls into the category of machine needing CE marking via a Notified Body.

Either way, if you are the buyer, it isn't your responsibility to CE mark the machine.

Are there no other suppliers of a similar machine within Europe? Or otherwise already correctly CE marked?
IanDakin  
#8 Posted : 26 August 2014 12:51:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Thanks JJ.

Unfortunately, I was only consulted after the machine was imported.

Ian
stillp  
#9 Posted : 26 August 2014 13:56:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stillp

Who actually imported the machine, your company or the "small family business"?
walker  
#10 Posted : 26 August 2014 15:28:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Ian,

If your company has brought it into the UK (and thus EEC), your company take on all the responsibilities of the manufacturer.
walker  
#11 Posted : 26 August 2014 15:42:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

IanDakin wrote:

And that is my problem, the guidance does not give scope for an independent test, as far as I can see.
Ian


A competent standards engineer would know which/what scope to apply.
I used to do this in a previous life (USA & Japan imports) but there was little money in it, as there was no one to enforce the rules so most people did not bother.

Most CE marks are applied "outside the rules" (illegally?) which is why I say they are not worth the paper they are printed on.

PUWER Open learning guidance (HSE doc) might help you




jay  
#12 Posted : 27 August 2014 08:33:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

If relevant, you could contact a notified body and pay them to undertake one of the three options that may be applicable.



MACHINERY DIRECTIVE - INDEPENDENT SOURCES OF ADVICE
http://webarchive.nation...v.uk/files/file54513.pdf

MACHINERY --Guidance notes on the UK Regulations SEPTEMBER 2009:-
https://www.gov.uk/gover...notes-uk-regulations.pdf

Machinery manufacturers: legal responsibilities
https://www.gov.uk/machi...d-their-responsibilities
http://www.cemarkit.co.uk/





Notified Body

A Notified Body (NB) is a legal entity or person who has been appointed by the Government and notified to the European Commission for the purposes of conformity assessment. In the UK, NBs are assessed by UKAS, the United Kingdom Accreditation Service on an annual basis and the status can be removed at any time.

Routes to compliance
There are 3 routes to compliance for equipment falling under the scope of the Machinery Directive.

1.Self Assessment.

This route is applicable for all types of equipment not included in Annex 4 of the Directive and for Annex 4 equipment which are wholly covered by harmonised standards. Under this route, the responsible person assesses the equipment against the Essential Health and Safety Requirements of the Directive, produces a technical file, produces a declaration of conformity or incorporation as appropriate and affixes the CE Marking.

2 .EC Type Examination.

This route applies to Annex 4 equipment that is not wholly covered by a harmonised standard or the manufacturer has not chosen to use the self assessment route. To use this route, the responsible person has the equipment assessed by a Notified Body who will issue a Type Examination certificate if they are satisfied that the equipment complies.

3 .Full quality assurance.

This route is for Annex 4 equipment which is manufactured using a full quality control system which has been assessed by a Notified Body. The NB issues the technical documentation and CE Marking.
firesafety101  
#13 Posted : 27 August 2014 09:04:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Have I missed something here, or have you?

Does CE marking apply to machinery supplied within the EU?

As far as I know the USA is not inside EU so does the Directive apply here?

If a piece of machinery is made outside the EU why should it have a European standard?
fairground42  
#14 Posted : 27 August 2014 09:32:54(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
fairground42

I have a related issue here with some equipment we have purchased from a 3rd party supplier in the UK, acting on behalf of a manufacturer in Vietnam. They have not been able to supply us with a CE certificate, but the manufacturers in Vietnam have sent us a copy of a Certificate of Inspection (CI) which they believe is a valid alternative. I have not heard of such a certificate, does any one know is there any viable international alternative to the CE marking/certification? I certainly have never come across this before.
JJ Proudbody  
#15 Posted : 27 August 2014 10:10:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JJ Proudbody

Yes, FireSafety - you have missed the point.

If machinery is made WITHIN the EU it must be CE marked.

If machiney is made OUTSIDE the EU it still has to be CE marked before it can be supplied/used in an EU country.

The onus is on whoever places the equipment 'on the market' to ensure the equipment is CE marked.

So if machinery is made in America obviously a non EU county - then CE marking is NOT required if the machniery is NOT supplied into a EU country.

However if the same American company wants to supply into the EU then the machinery has to be CE marked, even though designed and manufactured in the USA.

However, it is not necessarily true that the manufacturer is also the supplier into the EU - if imported into the EU by another company/agent etc. But from a design point of view the original designers, in practice, should be aware of the EHSRs from the EU Machinery Directive.

CE marking is not the be all and end all - I once inspected some machinery designed and built in Italy, so CE marking was applied etc - still very poor in terms of guarding etc, compared to UK standards.

Hence why pre delivey inspections ae important.

However, the bottom line is - new 'machinery' from whichever country cannot be legally sold in a EU county without a CE approval and mark applied.

JJ Proudbody  
#16 Posted : 27 August 2014 10:17:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JJ Proudbody

Fairground

Sounds like the equipment you have, is illegal from the paperwork point of view.

The 3rd party supplier is responsible for the CE making, by the look of it - if they have purchased the equipment from Vietnam for onward sale in the UK/EU.
walker  
#17 Posted : 27 August 2014 11:12:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

This is why the UK has so little manufacturing left. We played with a straight bat and everyone else just sends out some pointless paperwork and dodgy kit.
Buyers are clueless and ignore all the regs, despite the good advice available.
The average HSE inspector would not recognise a none conforming machine if the driveshaft hit them between the eyes. Great at enforcing DSE though!
firesafety101  
#18 Posted : 27 August 2014 11:17:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Jj thank you for putting me right, sounds like Ian should have ensured CE marking was applied prior to purchase. Bit of a minefield now then.
walker  
#19 Posted : 27 August 2014 11:30:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

FS
I think you mean Ian's buying dept.

What about your own feild? do you check that all the fire alarm kit conforms and is not a knock off?
walker  
#20 Posted : 27 August 2014 11:41:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

quote=fairground42]I have a related issue here with some equipment we have purchased from a 3rd party supplier in the UK, acting on behalf of a manufacturer in Vietnam. They have not been able to supply us with a CE certificate, but the manufacturers in Vietnam have sent us a copy of a Certificate of Inspection (CI) which they believe is a valid alternative. I have not heard of such a certificate, does any one know is there any viable international alternative to the CE marking/certification? I certainly have never come across this before.


Contact your trading standards folks - the 3rd party are breaking the law.
Either send the kit back or get it independently certified at 3rd party's cost.
IanDakin  
#21 Posted : 28 August 2014 12:13:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi All

Thanks for your help on this.

Just for clarity, I did not buy the machine, and I have training from the HSL on machinery safety.

Just thought it best to get other opinions.

Now to break the good new!

Ian
IanDakin  
#22 Posted : 28 August 2014 15:07:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Finally

This is about UK Regulations, based on an EU Directive, and it applies to the whole of the EEA.

Fairground and JJ Proudbody - Annex B of the BIS guidance states that equipment specifically for ue in fairgrounds and/or amusement parks are excluded from the Regulations.

Ian
walker  
#23 Posted : 28 August 2014 15:31:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Ian,

PM me if you need help
They might listen to an outsider but ignore you

Also I might be able to steer you towards a solution.
Ian Bell  
#24 Posted : 28 August 2014 20:29:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell

JJ Proudbody had already indicated at post #6 that the equipment might not need CE marking, if the equipment came into one of the excluded categories.
walker  
#25 Posted : 29 August 2014 08:23:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Ian Bell wrote:
JJ Proudbody had already indicated at post #6 that the equipment might not need CE marking, if the equipment came into one of the excluded categories.


I think you will find the excluded catagories are because these items have their own (much tighter) legal requirements.
IanDakin  
#26 Posted : 01 October 2014 12:07:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Thank you all for your input.

The machine was uplifted by the company selling it, and had a conformity engineer look at it.

Apparently it is unlikely to pass a CE test, so has been returned to the USA.

Ian
walker  
#27 Posted : 01 October 2014 12:11:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Thanks for letting us know.

Your company is lucky they have someone like you to keep them out of trouble.
I hope your boss is suitably grateful for your hard work on this issue.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.