Rank: Forum user
|
Hi All,
I know this is more of a HR issue but I'd appreciate some advice if possible.
I have an employee who is suffering from a neck complaint which affects his work (he works in a warehouse driving order picking machines and manually handling stock).
I've had him medically assessed and have been told that he may only drive machines with rear view mirrrors so that he doesn't have to turn when driving in reverse and cannot lift anything over 10kgs in weight.
Due to the nature of the job, I cannot guarantee this restriction on his work. My question is: since he is not fit to undertake his full duties and I have no alternative role for him, what are my options?
Thanks for any advice.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sinead wrote:Hi All,
I know this is more of a HR issue but I'd appreciate some advice if possible.
I have an employee who is suffering from a neck complaint which affects his work (he works in a warehouse driving order picking machines and manually handling stock).
I've had him medically assessed and have been told that he may only drive machines with rear view mirrrors so that he doesn't have to turn when driving in reverse and cannot lift anything over 10kgs in weight.
Due to the nature of the job, I cannot guarantee this restriction on his work. My question is: since he is not fit to undertake his full duties and I have no alternative role for him, what are my options?
Thanks for any advice.
Can the work not be adapted? Can reversing be removed for one way system?? (Space dependent)
Can a mechanical aid be obtained to help him with the manual side?
I cannot suggest an answer for where you stand on the options side of things, defo one for the HR dept.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I beleive something similair has come up on the forum before.
As I recall if the employee is unable to undertake their work there is an option for the employer to make them redundant or dismiss them. The employer must take reasonable steps to enable the employee to be able to undertake their works first though.
Link below offers more advice
https://www.gov.uk/dismi...ismissals-due-to-illness
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I tend to agree with Paul.
I'm sure on the HR side of things there would be the option to offer him another (similar) role with similar pay and conditions etc. to avoid having to let him go.
A question is, is his current neck problem a result of his work ?
Depending on the size of the warehouse, altering the whole system to remove the need for reversing may not be reasonable.
I'd also have safety concerns about fitting mirrors to remove the need to twist his neck while reversing. Would this be acceptable / can a full view all round be gained from mirrors alone.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Bottom line has to be - if the employee is not able to do the job - it is fair to dismiss him on the grounds of capability. But there may be costs associated with this (especially if the injury counts as a disability which it sounds as if it is - has the employee declared himself to be disabled?).
Too often, in difficult cases, HR people seem to be extremely reluctant to dismiss someone who is unfit for work. But it can be done and sometimes should be done. If you do not have good in house HR - speak to an employment law specialist (I can put you in touch with one if you need it..).
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.