Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi All
I have an area of the clients building which states asbestos as "high risk" and "immediate action required". there has been a twelve month period of employees entering this area. What do forum users think of this situation with regards to exposure? The asbestos has now been removed under controlled conditions, but would you have this reported to employees GPs as 'potential' exposure?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Depends
Who identified this as high risk. If it was an asbestos surveyor and there was an immediate risk of exposure to employees then he should have recomended that the area be immediatley sealed off.
Could you specify the type of ACM, its condition and its location.
Also you cannot report to GP`s but if you feel there has been exposure you should provide suitable advice and guidance to the affected employees to enable them to make that decision.
I believe this would also be reportable under RIDDOR.
"Hazardous escapes of substances"
"27 The unintentional release or escape of any substance which could cause personal injury to any person other than through the combustion of flammable liquids or gases.
The substances covered by this definition may be in any form: liquid, solid (eg powder), gaseous or vapour and may include, eg:
substances which may be hazardous to health (eg asbestos, phosgene, toluene diisocyanate)"
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The asbestos was identified as crysotile and amosite from lagging to pipework. Samples were taken from debris found on the floor area. An air test has been taken which come back as clear. The debris and lagging were removed following the finding of the debris, the air test was taken after the removal.
Although you cannot 'report' to the doctor, you can have a note placed on your notes, that is what i was referring to.
Any further help will be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If there was debris found on the floor then it is pretty certain that there was a degree of contamination especially given the friability of the material. As such it is highly likely that exposure has occurred.
With regards to providing information to staff who may have been affected, try contacting EMAS (employment medical advisory service) who used to have a free leaflet that you can give to people who have been subject to asbestos exposure.
The leaflet advised them on what they should do with regards to informing their GP etc and also was very proportional in advising them on the (minimal) risk of a one off asbestos exposure.
Clearly from what you describe though there is the potential for this material to have been deteriorating and releasing fibres for some time .
As to whether you take this further and report it to the HSE ? Legally I would say you should as described previously under RIDDOR. Personally speaking I think you would have to. Especially if you are going to advise people they have been exposed, because if you havnt they will.
The people responsible for this building have clearly known about this for some time and have ignored the asbestos surveys findings and knowingly exposed people to this so they should face the consequences. IMO
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Concur with the above replies, based on the information provided, this is RIDDOR reportable and likely to result in prosecution.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.