Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
johnmurray  
#1 Posted : 30 November 2014 11:55:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

walker  
#2 Posted : 01 December 2014 08:14:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

This is why we need better enforcement: the cowboys are driving the firms trying to obey the law to bankruptcy
bob youel  
#3 Posted : 01 December 2014 08:29:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Thanks John -U always provide good information and walker is correct as nobody who has the power etc. to do something about the situation cares
Isaac J Threadbare  
#4 Posted : 01 December 2014 08:49:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

As Walker or someone once said, you don't need to be an electrician to be an electrician. You just need to consider yourself to be competent. So it follows then that as long as the individual is not required to prove (in this case electrical) competence/knowledge and understanding in the exam room, he/she can think him/herself safe. Trained by an idiot, work like an idiot. http://www.electricalsaf...paigns/dont-die-for-diy/ I doubt this will change in the few years I have left but one never can tell.
walker  
#5 Posted : 01 December 2014 10:30:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

quote=Isaac J Threadbare]As Walker or someone once said, you don't need to be an electrician to be an electrician. You just need to consider yourself to be competent. .
I trust you are happy to retract that slanderous remark I've never alluded to anything of the sort Mods please do not pull his post - give him the chance to publicly apologise As for the rest of your post what has "your hobby horse" (which in the main, I happen to agree with)got to do with this post??
walker  
#6 Posted : 01 December 2014 10:59:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

the last word should read Thread
kevkel  
#7 Posted : 01 December 2014 12:46:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

"So it follows then that as long as the individual is not required to prove (in this case electrical) competence/knowledge and understanding in the exam room, he/she can think him/herself safe. Trained by an idiot, work like an idiot." This sounds similar to a post I was in the middle of writing but which disappeared and I have not been able to locate since. It was in regard to competency with electrics and conducting simple repairs or extension of sockets and I gave the terms by which I felt I was experienced and knowledgeable to complete these works without the need of a qualified electrician. Walker- you are quite right it bears no reference to this thread. Kevin
kevkel  
#8 Posted : 01 December 2014 12:47:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

Sorry should have quoted the first part of Isaac's post.
kevkel  
#9 Posted : 01 December 2014 13:03:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

Found the thread Isaac was on about and it was neither Walker or myself that made any comment. FYI- my posting relates to my house and not the sale of electrical services as was indicated in the original thread.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#10 Posted : 02 December 2014 09:06:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

I do apologise for placing your name on the post walker, I did say that I thought you or someone else 'once said'... there was no harm intended or applied. The point I was making (and failed) was that there are so many people out there doing rubbish work that it's had to tell who is good at anything when people can call themselves builders/electricians without any formal qualifications. Regarding relevance, all areas of safety relate to people involved I safety. As for extension leads and simple electrical repairs...not a lot to say on that except that there have been many cases of people getting a little surprise shall we say when connecting up simple electrical items. Again Walker, for adding your name I am sorry. As for pulling the post, crack on. No problem with that at all.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#11 Posted : 02 December 2014 09:12:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Kevkel, just out of curiosity, how do you test your electrical work? Say an extension lead you have made. Perhaps with a plug-in tester, something like a Martindale? I would really like to know this.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#12 Posted : 02 December 2014 09:33:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Kevkel I have to quote you here. 'It was in regard to competency with electrics and conducting simple repairs or extension of sockets and I gave the terms by which I felt I was experienced and knowledgeable to complete these works without the need of a qualified electrician'. Unless you know how to test ring-circuits, radial circuits, (and can tell the difference - only found by correct testing) are familiar with Zs, r1+r2 safe isolation (and have the correct equipment)and insulation testing then I respectfully suggest that you refrain from doing (as you call it) simple repairs or extension of sockets. You are condemned by your ignorance and it is for this reason that I ride 'my hobby horse'. I thought you were on the side of safety?
kevkel  
#13 Posted : 02 December 2014 09:59:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

Isaac, I have a mutimeter and a socket tester (not martindale but some generic brand) which I use to test any minor work, and with which I am satisified is safe. In reply to your comments, yes I am on the side of safety. The side that is practical, risk based, measured and planned. Before condemning people for their ignorance maybe you should find out a little information about the person! You have no idea who I am (asides my name and location), my experience, skills, background etc.
firesafety101  
#14 Posted : 02 December 2014 09:59:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I had reason to call out an electrician to my home last Friday, one of my underfloor heating controllers started to burn, (switch), I have a maintenance contract with one of the large electricity suppliers who cover everything (or so I thought) and they sent out the electrician. So far so good. On arrival he told me they do not cover underfloor heating but he would check everything is safe, but that I needed to call out a different electrician to rectify the problem. He confirmed the switch had burnt out then proceeded to carry out some safety checks of my house electrics. He asked me if he could test the RCD by switching off, I told him I would rather he didn't as I have lots of stuff to re-set so he didn't. He asked me where the water stop cock is and I showed him then he wanted to look under the sink for the earthing connections, my wife showed him the under sink cupboard which is full of all sorts of various containers of different household chemicals etc. and he decided not to bother. So he was going to carry out some safety checks and he didn't. Competent electrician ?
Isaac J Threadbare  
#15 Posted : 02 December 2014 10:06:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

First things first: You told him not to test the RCD. You are the client, you call the shots. He has no right to just switch stuff off if you won't let him.. Your call not his. Secondy, why didn't you move the chemicals out of the way. Access is required to test and inspect the electrical safety connections. Your call not his. I comes under Limitations an Extent discussed between the tester and the client. Your fault not his FS. You stopped him.
kevkel  
#16 Posted : 02 December 2014 10:07:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

Firesafety, My point exactly! Qualifications dont make someone competent! They go some way towards it yes but are not by themselves a measurement of competence. Its the experience, knowledge and skill which is the true measurement of competence. I have met electricians that I wouldnt allow on site to change the batteries in a remote control and others I would trust with my life. Maybe its just me but there seems to be a significant number of electricians who prefer to work live rather than lockout/tagout. I am constantly chasing and checking this. I understand why they dont want to do it (disruption of services) but they are still happy to do it. Competency?
kevkel  
#17 Posted : 02 December 2014 10:08:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

@John Murray, Apologies for the thread hijack. Kevin
Isaac J Threadbare  
#18 Posted : 02 December 2014 10:20:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Muli-meters are not recommended for testing on low voltage systems (GS38) nor can they carry out insulation tests or eath-loop-impedance tests. Plug-in socket testers cannot know if the neutral and earth are reversed or indeed if there is a valid earth path at the socket outlet. It is true that I don't know you (same for me as well) but I do know from what you write that you are not competence to do electrical work.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#19 Posted : 02 December 2014 10:24:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Please replace the word competence with competent. The problem with this forum is that people who don't actually know what they are talking about pass themselves off as competent to do so and endanger others. Kevkel (and any mods who may be looking in here). What you have posted is dangerous. To any one else... please do NOT test with the kit that Kevkel uses.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#20 Posted : 02 December 2014 10:45:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

If anyone would like an explanation on the above #18 and my qualifications in this matter pop a private message over and I'll send my contact number to you.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#21 Posted : 02 December 2014 11:35:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Kevkel READ ME and be a little bit safer http://www.electricalsaf...est-Practice-Guide-8.pdf
paulw71  
#22 Posted : 02 December 2014 11:39:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paulw71

Isaac I cant help but feel your posts would find a more interested and receptive audience on an electrical contracting forum.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#23 Posted : 02 December 2014 11:47:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

My apologies Paul, I keep thinking this was a safety site? If advice is being given on electrical matters here then let's give good and correct advice shall we? Kevkel and a few here give 'advice' to others regarding electrical matters yet he is rather short of knowledge himself. So what you're saying then Paul is you find it all too much for you to follow what is going on here? Or perhaps you would like to say if I'm wrong or right? Nice to see that you're not really interested in electrical matter mate.
chris42  
#24 Posted : 02 December 2014 11:52:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

The fine for the Crane hits power line, seems a bit pathetic. They were warned before and could have easily killed the driver. The fines don't seem to meet the crime. I know fines are meant to hurt not put businesses under, but sometimes the business should not exist. This was not an error or lack of forethought, this appears deliberate. The message will never get to some people, and I can't help but think they should not be allowed to run a company. Its very sad this is still going on in this day and age. Mind you, you have to wonder why an experienced crane driver didn't pipe up ! (or perhaps he did) Chris
paulw71  
#25 Posted : 02 December 2014 12:00:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paulw71

Then why not start a thread purely dedicated to why people should not undertake electrical works in their own homes without the correct competencies (and testing equipment) rather than hijacking threads and endeavouring to turn it into (yet another) a debate about electrical competency. We are all aware that there are many things we should not undertake if we are in anyway unsure how to do them. And the potential consequences of getting them wrong. I personally did not see any advice given. Merely one poster respond to you by saying he had undertaken some minor electrical works on his own property and had no problems. That is a statement not advice.
kevkel  
#26 Posted : 02 December 2014 12:46:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

My posts began by disagreeing that you always need a qualified electrician to do electrical work and gave an example of some very minor works that I had undertaken that I believed I did not need a qualified electrician to complete. There is no legislation that I am aware of that prohibits me from conducting minor work such as extending or replacing a socket or rewiring plugs etc. Not in ireland anyway! I clearly stated that this minor work was conducted in my own home that I had completed and regarded myself as competent to do. Isaac probed what kit I was using to which I replied. Interestingly it was this kit that an inhouse electrician is my last workplace told me it would be fine to test with! I will go back to him when next down there. THAT IS NOT ADVICE PEOPLE JUST MY THOUGHTS. Isaac- I am aware that you are part of a campaign tasked with hitting the forums to raise electrical awareness and the use of qualified electricians only but as I have already stated competence is not based on qualifications alone. P.S.- I did not originally wire the house, I ran another socket box from an existing one using the colour coded wires to match to the correct terminals. If there was a phase/neutral cross or lack of an earth path it was put there by the "competent" electrician who wired the house! By the way I have also replaced a gravity fed electric shower which works perfectly.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#27 Posted : 02 December 2014 14:57:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Paul, walker says it all in post #2 and I for one totally agree with him/her (not taking the mick here walker as I really don't know if male or female, not that it matters either way) I (we) have started many threads on electrical safety here along with one or two others on this forum, and others, but, sad to say, only electrical people join-in. A truth is, most people involved in safety haven't much of a clue about electrical safety (another truth is that not many so-called electricians do either). The in-house electrician that Kevkel mentions being one of them. Let me try this. Does one need qualifications to become a Tech Iosh? I think the answer would be .... Yes Isaac Would anyone here take advice from a bloke who thinks he understands H&S without H&S qualifications and let them run a building site? I hope it's a NO Isaac. Kev, your last sentence says a lot mate. If the circuit was faulty before you worked on it (unless tested you would not know) and as you were the last one to work on it the defects have now been added to. Before we add to a circuit we test it to make sure it is sound. I hope you tested the shower circuit? But I hope with an RCD tester/loop impedance tester etc. By the a circuit will work with a neutral to earth fault and unless tested would not be picked up until a second fault popped up. (circuit and RCD - tested and please not tested by the push-button but tested correctly) I cannot speak for Ireland regarding you doing what you like to an electrical installation. But I would imagine that you may be asked to prove how you tested it if you killed someone and your electrical qualifications/experience may be asked for for that matter. A DIY book and a receipt from B&Q may not cut it in a court! (Please refer to Part P in the UK and a shower comes under Part P in the UK) Again, if you have installed an electric shower in the UK without notifying Building control you may have a problem
kevkel  
#28 Posted : 02 December 2014 15:41:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
kevkel

Isaac, I do not disagree with much of what you have said. I have never said I was competent to advise on electrical safety. In my work I have stringent contractor competency requirements that must be met and qualifications/training/knowledge/ membership of appropriate orgs etc and I would not tolerate any cowboy electricians on site! My point was that there are no legal requirements for a "qualified" electrician to conduct all electrical works and I gave examples e.g. minor works in the home. Its about competency and not all qualified persons are competent. As far as I am aware you do not necessarily need qualifications for TechIOSH but I am willing to stand corrected. Likewise being GradIOSH does not ensure your competency just indicates you have qualifications, hence CMIOSH, IPD to get there, and the requirement to maintain CPD. I agree with your last paragraph though that a good electrician will test before and after work. My sister lived in a house that the kitchen spots kept blowing and it was the fitting (230V fitting-1 of 4) was wired incorrectly but working. I had a structural, electrical and plumbing surveys conducted when buying the house (10 yrs ago now) with no electrical issues noted! Few plumbing problems though!!! No one (except me) has worked on electrics since. With regards the advice given about testing I will link in with they guy and see what he says and post reply on here.
achrn  
#29 Posted : 02 December 2014 16:27:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

Isaac J Threadbare wrote:
Would anyone here take advice from a bloke who thinks he understands H&S without H&S qualifications and let them run a building site? I hope it's a NO Isaac.
You don't need to be Tech IOSH to be a good Site Agent, Site Manager, and being Tech IOSH doesn't demonstrate competence or qualification at most of the things you do need to be a good site manager.
Isaac J Threadbare  
#30 Posted : 02 December 2014 16:32:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

Kev, then lets us part, if not as friends, but with a better understanding of who we are. You are on the money with your sentence below though. 'Its about competency and not all qualified persons are competent'. True words and words that need to be defined under perhaps a review of the EWR 1989 or by insurance companies when people apply for mortgages. We, as safety people (IMHO) should be pushing for tighter requirements for safety not saying in public words (I do apologise Kev for saying that you were 'giving advice' when in fact it was a 'point of view'. That was a misreading of the post on my part) I'm not the most skilled writer on the forum but I'm on the side of safety (but not PC to any degree) By the way, I do have a H&S qualifications as well but that is another story
Isaac J Threadbare  
#31 Posted : 02 December 2014 16:48:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Isaac J Threadbare

It would appear that in the eyes of some qualifications are a waste of time and effort and all we need to do is convince others that we know what we are talking about. Well, chaps, that only works until you bump into someone who actually knows what they are talking about. On another post (that was removed) the same thing was said as I recall. If the people running safety on-site are doing it ad hoc without being qualified (again in another post that was removed) what kind of signals do you think that sends out to the people who see right through it all? Jobs for the boys? It may not be true but it is the way it is seen. It seems to me that the less you know the better you are. Happy days.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.