Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

PPE
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Nikki-Napo  
#1 Posted : 29 January 2015 12:02:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nikki-Napo

Good morning everyone Can someone please enlighten me with regard to this situation. Working in cold storage (picking/packing/loading) in temperatures between 2-8 degrees. Frozen cold storage in temperatures going down to -25. The company are advising that they'd provide PPE, but it would be advantageous to provide your own. What I would like clarification on is this: Is this acceptable to expect an employee to provide their own PPE (regardless of working conditions) or Is this an advertising standards issue with regard to the wording of the advert. In my mind I know what I've decided is correct, but would like to know what others think.
walker  
#2 Posted : 29 January 2015 12:15:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Is there some confusion between PPE and clothing appropriate for work? I've never seen blokes (or blokesess) digging trenches in a business suit thy ten to wear scruffy clothes with the PPE ( as described in the RA) over them. Equally folks who do need to wear suits don't get the company to pay for them. Work wear is not usually PPE but there might be an overlap.
ashleywillson  
#3 Posted : 29 January 2015 12:15:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ashleywillson

I expect they will supply PPE in so far as to satisfy their controls for their risk assessments and safe systems of work but this is a minimum. Perhaps they mean that the new employee may find it useful to come with extra bits. For example, they may supply jacket, gloves and a hat, but some form of scarf may be advantageous to an employee but is not supplied. I think it is misuse of the term PPE perhaps?
walker  
#4 Posted : 29 January 2015 12:16:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

"they tend" edit function please!
jay  
#5 Posted : 29 January 2015 14:14:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

If an employer has undertaken a suitable & sufficient risk assessment for cold working environments, than I would expect it to cover the range of employees rather than the so called minimum such that some would have to supply their own!. Unfortunately, the selection of thermal PPE in context of cold stress is not "simple" . Refer to HSE references on cold stress. http://www.hse.gov.uk/temperature/coldstress.htm Cold stress Employers and employees should note that where HSE does not have specific guidance ie working in temperatures below 12°C, compliance with British/European Standards ensures you are working to the minimum standard expected. As a first point of reference in these circumstances employers/employees are advised to refer to the following British Standards: BS EN 511: Specification for protective gloves against cold ISO 13732-3 Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Touching of cold surfaces Part 3. Ergonomics data and guidance for application BS 7915: 1998 Ergonomics of the thermal environment : Guide to design and evaluation of working practices for cold indoor environments. ISO 11079 Evaluation of cold environments - Determination of required clothing insulation (IREQ) ISO 15743 Ergonomics of the thermal environment - cold workplaces - risk assessment and management The standards named are not an exhaustive list but provide a basis from which to formulate a risk assessment strategy and to start managing the problem. You may need to refer to additional standards but this will be dependant on your operational circumstances.
Nikki-Napo  
#6 Posted : 29 January 2015 16:05:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nikki-Napo

This was a job advert, and the wording of the advert was that PPE would be provided but that it would be advantageous to provide ones own! I wouldn't know what RA the employer has undertaken.
walker  
#7 Posted : 30 January 2015 08:53:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Nikki-Napo wrote:
This was a job advert, and the wording of the advert was that PPE would be provided but that it would be advantageous to provide ones own! .
translation: we will reluctantly provide PPE (the cheapest rubbish we think we can get away with) but acknowledge it will be unsuitable for the task.
chris42  
#8 Posted : 30 January 2015 09:03:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

walker wrote:
Nikki-Napo wrote:
This was a job advert, and the wording of the advert was that PPE would be provided but that it would be advantageous to provide ones own! .
translation: we will reluctantly provide PPE (the cheapest rubbish we think we can get away with) but acknowledge it will be unsuitable for the task.
Alternative translation: preference will be given to employing someone who has their own PPE, so we don't have to spend anything !
Animax01  
#9 Posted : 30 January 2015 09:19:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

Seems a bit of a starnge one, and I think these translations maybe quite accurate. Section 9 of the HASAWA is quite clear, Duty not to charge employees in persuance etc. Niko-Nako, might be worth showing this small section to your employer. I'm not sure that a company can really justify this statement on a legal basis. Basically it looks like they are saying we won't fulfil our legal obligation if you will do it for us.
Nikki-Napo  
#10 Posted : 30 January 2015 13:58:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nikki-Napo

Animax01 wrote:
Seems a bit of a starnge one, and I think these translations maybe quite accurate. Section 9 of the HASAWA is quite clear, Duty not to charge employees in persuance etc. Niko-Nako, might be worth showing this small section to your employer. I'm not sure that a company can really justify this statement on a legal basis. Basically it looks like they are saying we won't fulfil our legal obligation if you will do it for us.
Re the HASAWA, I knew that bit was correct, hence the reason I didn't post my *orginal* thoughts as I wanted to get different opinions. This is not my employer. I did report my concerns, but was basically told it won't be investigated as *they* (the organisation I reported it to) didn't feel anything was wrong, and referred me to the advertising standards agency. With job adverts like this, it makes me wonder what else this employer is doing which isn't right/is against the law/taking advantage of their employees who may or may not be aware of their rights in terms of HS&E. How can any employer know that someone's PPE is correct and fit for purpose if they've not supplied it, which in turn would mean that they haven't specified any standard to which it must adhere, is beyond me. My main concern with this job advert is the environment in which they want the person to work.
Animax01  
#11 Posted : 30 January 2015 16:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

Fair point Nikki-Napo, aplogies if I was preaching to the converted. You are right to be concerned about their H&S culture, they have shown their colours very clearly. I was doing an induction recently and the inductee had brought some safety shoes, expecting to have to supply them based on previous employment experiences. I went on to explain that they needen't have bothered, they asked why this was the case. It's difficult in those instances to be diplomatic and not blurt out "because they don't care about you, just their profit!!" Good post, has provided some food for thought today.
Colossians 1:14  
#12 Posted : 30 January 2015 16:38:43(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Colossians 1:14

walker wrote:
Nikki-Napo wrote:
This was a job advert, and the wording of the advert was that PPE would be provided but that it would be advantageous to provide ones own! .
translation: we will reluctantly provide PPE (the cheapest rubbish we think we can get away with) but acknowledge it will be unsuitable for the task.
This
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.