Rank: Super forum user
|
Does anyone know what CSCS are doing about CDM2015? A proportion of the questions in section 17 will no longer be true, but I've seen no new question sets or comment.
For example, question 17.1: "Under the current Construction (Design and Management) Regulations, who has responsibility for appointing a competent CDM co-ordinator?" In ten days time, the correct answer is 'no-one', but that's not one of the options the test offers.
Q 17.4, the stated correct answer is now wrong - under CDM07 the answer is D, but under CDM15 the answer will be A.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I have as little to do with CSCS cards as possible, however I'm prompted to raise the question:
In what way do questions about the technicality of Regulations engender or raise competency in an Industry?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ron Hunter wrote:I have as little to do with CSCS cards as possible, however I'm prompted to raise the question:
In what way do questions about the technicality of Regulations engender or raise competency in an Industry? Many of the questions in the CSCS test don't, in my view. It's just another manifestation of the competency-industry that CDM2015 is supposed to tackle, but in the meantime we still have clients that say they want it, and what a client wants and pays for (provided it is legal, decent and honest), a client gets.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ron - agreed, but most of our clients want to see it anyway, I guess it puts a tick in their box which is a shame...
achrn - I guess they will change the answers to be correct once the regs come into force?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hmm... Legal decent and honest... I guess one out of three ain't too bad for a Friday afternoon!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Firstly, CSCS cards do not alone establish competence. From the mouth of the CSCS CEO: "This led to confusion over whether CSCS cards were site passports, health and safety cards or competency cards. A CSCS card is none of these and the clue to its main purpose is in the title. A CSCS card certifies that the individual has achieved relevant qualifications and training." http://www.shponline.co....onstruction-cscs-update/Reliance on CSCS cards to determine competence is not advisable and anybody who does so is not managing competence appropriately. The CSCS health and safety test does not establish competence - it merely establishes a minimum level of H&S awareness. The level/type of card is issued after relevant evidence of qualifications/training is provided. If organisations choose to use CSCS as part of their regime for competence management, this could be appropriate, but from what I've observed in the construction industry, very few seem to get it right - there have been instances when people get onto site with a CSCS card that has no relevance to the work they are undertaking.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ashleywillson wrote:Ron - agreed, but most of our clients want to see it anyway, I guess it puts a tick in their box which is a shame...
achrn - I guess they will change the answers to be correct once the regs come into force? Presumably, but they want people to revise for the test, and the current question books contain a significant number of answers that will be wrong (or not applicable). In eight days time, will they be wanting the answer that was in the book but is now wrong, or will they be wanting the correct answer that the book (and therefore possibly the system) says is wrong? Many of our candidates score 100%. Many of them worry about these things. In essence, they identify this as a game and don't like not knowing what the rules are. I have been asked whether they should answer questions with the correct answer or the answer the book says is correct, and not having seen anything from CSCS I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Can anyone answer why people who have completed any of the following - NEBOSH General / Construction Certificate, Diploma or NVQ Level 5, Masters. Then have to complete a basic H&S Test in order to get on to a site.
I've had this answered before, simply by people saying it's the rules, but who's rules.
I turned up for a site induction two weeks ago, and produced my CMIOSH card, I was told that's fine but you need a CSCS card to back it up.
Surely as a safety professional and going on site to carry out safety inspections and audits my CMIOSH card would be sufficient.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
notlob wrote:Can anyone answer why people who have completed any of the following - NEBOSH General / Construction Certificate, Diploma or NVQ Level 5, Masters. Then have to complete a basic H&S Test in order to get on to a site.
I've had this answered before, simply by people saying it's the rules, but who's rules.
The contractor's rules. It's the contractor's site, as long as the rules aren't illegal the contractor can institute whatever rules they like.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Yes I understand the contractors rules and if that's the rules, my question was more on surely NEBOSH qualifications out weigh CSCS qualifications, yet Clients don't seem to think so, yet when they advertise for H&S person(s) they insist on CMIOSH not CSCS
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
When I sat the CSCS test in 2008 one of the questions was about the Planning Supervisor, which as you know became the CDM-C in the revised CDM 2007 Regulations...so don't expect anything too quickly.
Why when we have bonifde h&s qualifications do we have to site the CSCS test? - because it's a cash cow.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
notlob wrote:Yes I understand the contractors rules and if that's the rules, my question was more on surely NEBOSH qualifications out weigh CSCS qualifications, yet Clients don't seem to think so, yet when they advertise for H&S person(s) they insist on CMIOSH not CSCS A CSCS card is not a qualification. If used correctly and assuming CSCS checks are rigorous, it should serve as evidence that an individual has relevant qualifications and training for the type of work they will be performing on site. In addition, a CSCS card gives an indication of the Health and Safety awareness an individual has - however, this will not be site specific and therefore this needs to be built upon with relevant site inductions and training. CSCS cards should only be used to evaluate competence as part of a suitable competence management system - for example, how does one evaluate experience, which is not covered by the card? Should there be flexibility in the approach taken? There could be, but the competence management process should outline this - as Mr Joe Supervisor can't be expected to evaluate qualifications and experience if the process for doing so is not suitably outlined. Or indeed if Mr Joe Supervisor does not have the competence to do so. My advice, get yourself a CSCS card - its not an argument you will win in the short term. What needs to change is the approach to competence management in the industry - and this will not be driven at a site level, where a box-ticking approach requires Mr Joe Supervisor to check for a CSCS card. The other area you need to tackle is CSCS giving recognition to H&S qualifications. Saying that, I have black CSCS H&S Manager card, so it should be straight forward to get.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
achrn wrote:Does anyone know what CSCS are doing about CDM2015? A proportion of the questions in section 17 will no longer be true, but I've seen no new question sets or comment.
Q 17.4, the stated correct answer is now wrong - under CDM07 the answer is D, but under CDM15 the answer will be A.
After some chasing in circles, I've had a response from CITB, which says that all CDM 2007 questions invalidated by the CDM 2015 release will be suspended from 1st April 2015. Questions that remain valid under CDM 2015 will be used until a new set of questions come live in June. The new CDM 2015 questions are now available in the new editions of the HS&E test revision books, CD’s and Apps. (But they weren't when I started the process of asking the question).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have been a H&S person for several years and had to retake the operators test last July for my visitors card, I failed it, I got two questions wrong, I remember thinking at the time of the test the answers given were a bit ambiguous but I think maybe I was a bit Cocky being a H&S professional. Before retaking the test I noticed the new AQP card which I was qualified for but required the Managers test to be taken, so two weeks later I took and passed the test and now have a nice shiny white AQP card.
I agree that as a person who has passed a higher H&S qualification why should I need a CSCS card but I also agree having worked for the PC that's its just as easy to ask everyone to have a CSCS card to show basic H&S awareness then to look at a myriad of certificates each time you do an induction for 10+ operatives to identify what level they're at. Lazy? not really, a 10+ person induction takes up most of my day what with checking cards, certs, Photos and the induction it's self so anything that reduces the time taken is good for me.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I carried out safety walk rounds on the Principal Contractor's site in my capacity as the Client's Safety Advisor. Before I was allowed access to the site I was asked whether I had a CSCS card or something like a NEBOSH Certificate as this was one of their requirements. I supplied a copy of my NEBOSH Certificate, NEBOSH Diploma and Masters Degree in Health Safety and Environmental Management. I was not required to undertake the CSCS process. It seems to be that it depends on what the site rules are and whether those controlling access to site are "jobs worths".
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.