Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RO  
#1 Posted : 11 April 2015 15:27:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
RO

A rendering contractor has no in house architect or designer as they do not need one to design their works. They do act as PC on projects where they coordinate other trades (scaffodlers etc) can PD be an in house role, maybe by a safety professional?
djupnorth  
#2 Posted : 11 April 2015 20:48:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
djupnorth

RO, I am sure some of my colleagues may disagree, but I have two points to make: i. I cannot envisage any construction project that requires no design input at all; and ii. Unless the health and safety practitioner in question has relevant design experience, I cannot envisage them wanting to take on the liability of a PD role. That said, the short answer to your question is 'yes'. Technically, anybody who is competent to do so can take on the PD role. The question will be, would he/she want to? Sorry to be such a pain but I hope this does help. Kind regards. DJ
RO  
#3 Posted : 12 April 2015 15:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
RO

Thanks DJ, I'd disagree based on the fact that an organisation can be named as a PD it does not have to be an individual. In fact the HSE stated at recent seminar I attended that a group role was the preferred option. L153 names engineers, technicians and quantity surveyors as possible designers. Surely a company who employs all 3 of these roles could take on the PD role as a business rather than allocating to an individual. what do you think for low risk design works such as type of render, colour of paint, door fitting etc. I understand you'd want the classic designer/ architect to take the PD role for a large new build project but for a project which consists of a high amount of low risk maintenance work I wouldn't see a RIBA trained architect as the right person for the job.
torkee878  
#4 Posted : 12 April 2015 21:29:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
torkee878

I think the implication of CDM 2015 on the requirement for the PD role go much wider than those referred to above. For example, a very small kitchen re-fit business (which would, of course, be classed as construction work) employing say 2 direct persons and regularly using a subcontractor to do the electrical and gas installation work. Under CDM 2015 this business would incur PD duties and responsibilities (and be required to evidence PD competence when bidding for work!!). The same small business would also now be a PC under CDM 2015 and again would need to demonstrate competence in the PC role including site safety management e.g. CITB SMSTS certification. Reality is, thousands of similar construction related small businesses will not have the slightest idea of these requirements and responsibilities let alone be able to demonstrate them. What a mess!!!
RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 13 April 2015 09:26:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

torkee878 wrote:
I think the implication of CDM 2015 on the requirement for the PD role go much wider than those referred to above. For example, a very small kitchen re-fit business (which would, of course, be classed as construction work) employing say 2 direct persons and regularly using a subcontractor to do the electrical and gas installation work. Under CDM 2015 this business would incur PD duties and responsibilities (and be required to evidence PD competence when bidding for work!!). The same small business would also now be a PC under CDM 2015 and again would need to demonstrate competence in the PC role including site safety management e.g. CITB SMSTS certification. Reality is, thousands of similar construction related small businesses will not have the slightest idea of these requirements and responsibilities let alone be able to demonstrate them. What a mess!!!
I agree 100%. It make the new regulations a complete farce, especially as we know from previous experience the HSE will enforce them frugally.
firesafety101  
#6 Posted : 13 April 2015 11:23:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Like so many new laws it is up to the general public to know the changes. Builders are usually members of trade associations who will inform their members about CDM 2015 so they should be able to adopt and adapt to the changes. If they do not on their own head be it, we safety professionals should not be getting involved in this side of the business unless it is to advice clients? May I ask do we all know the latest changes to driving laws regarding middle lane use on motorways, for example? The Police will enforce this without sympathy for anyone who says they were not aware.
Ron Hunter  
#7 Posted : 13 April 2015 15:52:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

A fair question, RO. Confusion entirely brought about by HSE decision to introduce (yet another) duty holder term which does not feature in the parent Directive (which refers to the Project Supervisor and the coordinator for safety and health matters at both the Project preparation and Project execution stages. The one-size-fits-all approach in CDM2015 does force a pragmatic approach to smaller Projects, and a group/team discharge of the PD role will often be a necessity. Do bear in mind though that the PD is appointed by the Client. For domestic Projects, the default will often necessarily mean that Principal Contractor also takes on the PD role (however limited it may be). As others here confirm though, the definition of "designer" in the Regs is broad, and it does include those specifying products, materials etc. Hope this helps.
bob youel  
#8 Posted : 14 April 2015 08:26:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

in my experience there are many many jobs where no designer is ever involved e.g. where a 'like for like' direct replacement with no other change being made takes place; - e.g. replace a number of doors [old off new on] = no designer input, replace a number of sets of taps [old off new on] = no designer input and so on and on Whilst I have quoted mini jobs the same can be said for some large industrial jobs as well e.g. my last but one job; power station outages where the main boiler tubes are 'like for like' replaced under a new for old system where the new must be identical to the old from drawings/specifications that have been in place for many many years and teh designers are now passed away and 'new' designers are nowhere to be seen and as has already been said these new regs are probably not fit for purpose
Alfasev  
#9 Posted : 14 April 2015 10:49:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev

I disagree, there is always someone making design decisions. Design includes drawings, design details, specifications and bills of quantities (including specification of articles or substances) relating to a structure, and calculations prepared for the purpose of a design. Take the like for like replacement, someone made that decision like for like was appropriate and/or specified materials, size etc. Someone investigated what had to be replaced and you would not replace, like for like, an old ACM fire door. The design element may be minimal but there was a designer or designers. I think the difficulty is who is the Principal Designer and get them not to panic. The design decisions for job may be split between the contractor and client. In my opinion, for jobs like this, the Client or their FM contractor is normally the best fit to the PD role.
RO  
#10 Posted : 14 April 2015 13:08:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
RO

Thanks for the comments, very helpful. Ron, I should have clarified that in my example the client has stated they want the PC to do the PD role too. I think we have established that when no traditional design such as drawings is needed then it could be one of a few people who occupy the PD role or even a group including the person who specifies the materials, the technical team who state how to fit them, the person that orders them etc. In this case the PC was thinking they had to employ a RIBA certified Architect to oversee this design team but didn't understand why.
Stedman  
#11 Posted : 14 April 2015 14:49:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Stedman

RO wrote:
Thanks for the comments, very helpful. Ron, I should have clarified that in my example the client has stated they want the PC to do the PD role too. I think we have established that when no traditional design such as drawings is needed then it could be one of a few people who occupy the PD role or even a group including the person who specifies the materials, the technical team who state how to fit them, the person that orders them etc. In this case the PC was thinking they had to employ a RIBA certified Architect to oversee this design team but didn't understand why.
That is fine until the thorny subject of PI insurance comes up for undertaking the PD role. See:http://www.construction-manager.co.uk/management/cdm-2015-spells-safety-first-designers-and-insurer/
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.