Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ehsa  
#1 Posted : 02 July 2015 09:07:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ehsa

Hi all, I have been trying to ascertain whether PERMANENTLY moored tankers within a port for use of STS transfers and bunkering would fall under the COMAH regs. The tankers are not intermediate temporary storage as they are permanently moored and re supplied with fuel via ship to ship transfers. I have been told by some of my colleges that because the establishment is a specialised oil tanker other maritime regulations apply yet they have not provided any proof of this and further to this would something that is covered by maritime regs override COMAH regs? Hope somebody can shed some light. Thanks
John D C  
#2 Posted : 02 July 2015 10:32:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John D C

From your description they are ships being used as funny shaped storage tanks. If they are permanently moored and cannot sail then they are no longer classed as a ship and therefore would not be exempt from the COMAH Regs. There was once a ship permanently moored in North Wales which tried to claim exemption from all sorts of legislation because the owners claimed it was a ship but it was ruled that as it was permanently moored and did not sail it was no longer a ship in law. Unfortunately I cannot find any more detail of this as it occurred in the late 1970, early 1980s, Even if classed as maritime storage on shore it would not be exempt - see guidance on the COMAH Regs para 72. Take care JohnC
Granlund40055  
#3 Posted : 02 July 2015 11:03:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Granlund40055

I too think the tankers would fall under the regs. The new regs came into force on 1st June and the new guidance document L111 may give you the answer you need http://www.hse.gov.uk/pUbns/priced/l111.pdf The tankers appear to come under the definition of an “installation” as they are floating storage. It is also “reasonable to foresee” the “presence of a dangerous substance” at your establishment. See para 62 “Where the presence of a dangerous substance at an establishment is temporary, whether or not it should be included in the establishment’s inventory, shall depend on the extent to which the presence is ‘reasonable to foresee’. Operators are encouraged to speak to the competent authority for advice in these circumstances. “ I do not see how any maritime regulations can overrule COMAH requirements. The regs do not apply to transport of dangerous substances outside an establishment - but this is permanent storage. The new regs/guidance don’t appear to refer any longer to temporary intermediate storage but require operators to consider the total amount likely to be present on site. Hope this helps Ian
ehsa  
#4 Posted : 03 July 2015 08:26:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ehsa

Thanks guys for the help you have confirmed by opinion, sometimes senior management think I am bonkers and I lose conviction in my arguments. Really appreciate it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.