Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Invictus  
#1 Posted : 13 July 2015 10:56:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Quick question are children's homes exempt from putting up fire safety notices, i.e. Exit signs, fire doors and action notices. I am being told this time and again but I cannot locate an exemption anywhere.

I am aware that secure units, prisons etc. Can lock final exit doors for the obvious reasons.
bob youel  
#2 Posted : 13 July 2015 15:31:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

no
Corfield35303  
#3 Posted : 13 July 2015 15:33:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Corfield35303

Hi, the 'Children's Homes' (England) Regulations 2015 make some requirements (below) and seem to state that if agreed with the local fire authority, a children's home can operate either in or out of the RRFSO2005.

If operating outside RRFSO2005 then some basic requirements are required (listed below), an 'adequate means of escape' is required but this doesn't mention signage. I would argue to be adequate it would normally need signs, but imagine a domestic house type setting with three stable and mature-ish residents and a carer...?

The argument would be that a fire plan similar to what you would have at home would be OK, in this circumstance, in addition to the other specifics listed below. The rationale being to keep it as 'homely' as possible....

Regs: Fire precautions

25.—(1) After consultation with the fire and rescue authority, the registered person must—

(a) take adequate precautions against the risk of fire, including the provision of suitable fire equipment in the children’s home;

(b) provide adequate means of escape from the home in the event of fire;

(c) make arrangements for persons working at the home to receive suitable training in fire prevention; and

(d) ensure, by means of fire drills and practices at suitable intervals, that persons working at the home and, so far as reasonably practicable, children are aware of the procedure to be followed in case of fire.

(2) If the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005(1) applies to the home—

(a) paragraph (1) does not apply; and

(b) the registered person must ensure that the requirements of that Order and any regulations made under it, except for article 23 (duties of employees), are complied with in respect of the home.

(3) In this regulation, “the fire and rescue authority” means the fire and rescue authority under the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004(2) for the area in which the home is located.
Invictus  
#4 Posted : 13 July 2015 15:47:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Thanks, I take it that the agreement would need to be in writing.
Corfield35303  
#5 Posted : 13 July 2015 16:00:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Corfield35303

Hi - I guess so, the RRFSO2005 guidance for residential care homes (below) indicates that at some 'simple' premises you don't need signs, I'd suggest the vast majority would. You may be able to do the assessment yourself to say signs aren't needed under the RRFSO2005. Certainly if it was outside the RRFSO it would need to be agreed. I cant actually think of any reason why any children's home would need to fall outside these requirements, maybe some types of foster homes or core and cluster perhaps...?

"Signs

In care premises it is important to avoid an ‘institutional’ environment. However, signs must be used, where necessary, to help people identify escape routes, find firefighting equipment and emergency fire telephones. These signs are required under the Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations 19965,6 and must comply with the provisions of those Regulations.

Other than in the smallest and simplest of premises where the exits are in regular use and familiar to staff, residents and visitors, a fire risk assessment that determines that no escape signs are required (because, for example, trained staff
will always be available to help residents and visitors to escape routes), is unlikely to be acceptable to an enforcing authority."
toe  
#6 Posted : 13 July 2015 19:54:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

In Scotland Children's homes require a registration from SCSWIS, the registration document will not be granted unless the Fire and Rescue Service have inspected the premises and are happy with the fire safety requirements.

Sometimes they may allow minimal or no fire safety signage in the property to make it a 'homely environment', but they may ensure that other/or additional safety measures are in place, for example, sprinkler system, compulsory fire instruction given to residence, a solid evacuation plan that is practiced regularly, adequate means of escape, training for staff, etc...
Invictus  
#7 Posted : 14 July 2015 08:53:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

It seems to be a bit of a grey area. I have even completed a risk assessment on a resedential school were they said OFSTED said they could lock final exit doors. I have asked for theis in writing as I think there are other ways to ensure that young people can't leave without permission.

I'll go to the local fire and rescue service.

Thanks for all your help.
hannahbilson  
#8 Posted : 11 May 2017 10:25:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
hannahbilson

Originally Posted by: Corfield35303 Go to Quoted Post
Hi - I guess so, the RRFSO2005 guidance for residential care homes (below) indicates that at some 'simple' premises you don't need signs, I'd suggest the vast majority would. You may be able to do the assessment yourself to say signs aren't needed under the RRFSO2005. Certainly if it was outside the RRFSO it would need to be agreed. I cant actually think of any reason why any children's home would need to fall outside these requirements, maybe some types of foster homes or core and cluster perhaps...?

"Signs

In care premises it is important to avoid an ‘institutional’ environment. However, signs must be used, where necessary, to help people identify escape routes, find firefighting equipment and emergency fire telephones. These signs are required under the Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations 19965,6 and must comply with the provisions of those Regulations.

Other than in the smallest and simplest of premises where the exits are in regular use and familiar to staff, residents and visitors, a fire risk assessment that determines that no escape signs are required (because, for example, trained staff
will always be available to help residents and visitors to escape routes), is unlikely to be acceptable to an enforcing authority."
I totally agree with you and I think everyone must keep their home under safety guidelines otherwise it can lead you to a big disaster. In my city, a couple of fire companies are motivating people of making their homes under safety guidelines by starting useful campaigns. I too had taken part in two campaigns but only one of them was incredibly useful and also it make my mind able to think about safety precautions. That campaign was created by a UK base file name I still remember their name like Raydaw Fire Protection. But I still have one question from them, they emphasize on fire alarms and they talked about Fire Alarms in Manchester and Bolton if I don't forget almost Ummmmm......... 10 times in their campaigns and it made me think that why they are struggling to install fire alarms in these two cities. I still have this question in my mind and I will surely ask them in future.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.