Rank: Forum user
|
Hi.
I have a question regarding the automatic closing of a roller shutter door that operates approx 20 seconds after a fire alarm being activated, it has an independant warning sound and flashing light. It is approx 2.5m x 1.5m opening, normally used for tea trollys to and from the small kitchen area. This door has a fire rating of 60 mins.
I ask the question that in the automatic unmanned lowering of the door (Due to fire safety), it will not stop if it encounters an obstruction. Apart from telling people, putting signs up, having a warning light and sounder, should this not have an Edge Safety device fitted irrespective of it being a fire door?
Trying to find the requirements to have this rather than risking out - elimination rather than raising the risk of a crush to either a member of the public, staff, vunrable persons etc.
Any help would be appriciated - If this was mine, the device would be fitted but need to know the legislation.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Why would you not have an automatic stop on a door like this?
When you say it won't stop if it encounters an obstruction - unless the motors are sufficiently powerful and the door sufficiently strong to completely cut through any tea trolley, or god forbid, person unfortunate enough to be in the way it still won't seal effectively so you'll have the worst of both worlds, a trapped person and a fire door that isn't fully closed!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi I will leave it to one of my more informed colleagues to advise you on the legalistic side of this, I can only share with you my experience in this regard. I to had an issue with this, all our warehouse roller shutter doors would close automatically if for what ever reason the fire alarms went off resulting in some occasions of a forklift truck being struck by a descending shutter door. We fitted a delay system on the shutter doors with a light warning system, if I recall it was set to 8 secs. If the opening is only for the use of tea trolleys etc. why could you not use fire doors with automatic magnetic closing devices.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This may help: http://www.hse.gov.uk/wo...ry/faq-powered-gates.htmLike Steve I know on large commercial roller doors you can get that with trip censors that will stop them closing before they hit an obstruction. These like yours formed part of the fire strategy as well as protecting against noise and heat. They were design to automatically shut every time they were opened and to sound an alarm until the obstruction was moved where they continued to shut. So the kit is out there.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Steve W1 wrote:Hi I will leave it to one of my more informed colleagues to advise you on the legalistic side of this, I can only share with you my experience in this regard. I to had an issue with this, all our warehouse roller shutter doors would close automatically if for what ever reason the fire alarms went off resulting in some occasions of a forklift truck being struck by a descending shutter door. We fitted a delay system on the shutter doors with a light warning system, if I recall it was set to 8 secs. If the opening is only for the use of tea trolleys etc. why could you not use fire doors with automatic magnetic closing devices.
Totally agree, the kitchen is only 5m x 2m with no gas, or electric cooker,m just a toaster and microwave. I as not part of the initial setup, and just there at handover, the fire bloke said it did not warrant a safety edge as it would restrict its original use... burnt toast???
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
ttxela wrote:Why would you not have an automatic stop on a door like this?
When you say it won't stop if it encounters an obstruction - unless the motors are sufficiently powerful and the door sufficiently strong to completely cut through any tea trolley, or god forbid, person unfortunate enough to be in the way it still won't seal effectively so you'll have the worst of both worlds, a trapped person and a fire door that isn't fully closed! It is significant enough to sustain an injury if caught, but i was not going to try it...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I see this slightly differently.
What is the purpose of the fire shutter? Does it form part of a more extensive fire barrier between two parts of a site?
20 secs is more than enough time for everyone to be well clear of the closing door - a 5m x 2m kitchen will be evacuated well before the door operates. If not, why not?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In general, these type of fire separation devices should not be on emergency escape routes or as a means of escape they are designed to prevent the spread of fire - as David has suggested I would expect the premises to be evacuated before the movement of the door.
Some of these devises have a heat cut of devise fitted to the motor , if their is an electrical overload on the motor it will cut off and stop or return to the top and start to lower again (exactly the way you electric windows work in you car, stick you arm in the window and it will either stop or go back down). Check with the manufacturer of the door or the operating instructions to find out.
Some of these devises (the more worrying ones) that are not connected to the alarm system and have a big spring (like the one on a garage door) and if there is a fire the fusable link melts and they will lower quite fast and will not stop. Generally these do not affect the occupants of the building as full evacuation should have taken place before they lower or they lower over a window. These type can cause issues for the fire service fighting a fire on the premises.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Toe wrote:In general, these type of fire separation devices should not be on emergency escape routes or as a means of escape they are designed to prevent the spread of fire - as David has suggested I would expect the premises to be evacuated before the movement of the door.
I accept that traditionally, fusible link operated shutters should not operate when the public were in the building. However this is the 21st century and this is now acceptable. Furthermore I totally disagree that fire shutters should not be used on escape routes. Shutters used widely in atria and other open plan buildings to protect escape routes, and therefore they operate immediately upon an evacuation being signalled from the fire alarm system - with the building fully occupied. Many large offices and department stores use shutters and fire curtains to protect means of escape in this way I had a dispute with a London council's licencing dept where a means of escape from sleeping accommodation was via a staircase and through a retail area (The retailer did not want fire doors between shop and stairs). The solution was a drop down fire curtain which was designed to immediately fall and separate the retail area from the stairs, requiring those using a staircase from the sleeping accommodation above to use an alternative route via continuing down to the basement. The council said this solution was non compliant. I argued it was legally compliant but simply didn't meet the council's own policy which isn't the same. I won! This curtain had a device fitted which may help the OP. A IR beam was fitted in the proposed path of the curtain. If it was broken for more than 20 seconds, a local alarm would sound. This was to prevent stock from the retail area creeping under the curtain, but allowed the beam to be broken 100s of times a day as people walked momentarily to/from the staircase. It was very effective
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
mssy
You make some good points and I acknowledge that you have used a fire curtain to divert people to safety in this case. What I was alluding to was that fire shutters are normally heavy metal shutter that could cause personal injury to people when in operation that will either lower upon alarm activation or via a fusable link, in which should not be located onto emergency exit's. I believe this is what the OP was concerned about, personal injury, and is seeking advice.
However, fire curtains are a different thing, in which are designed no to cause injury (as you have suggested stopped by a light beam) which are widely used in shopping centres etc...
I stand by my statement Fire Shutters must not be used on a means of escape.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Toe - as mssy says are more common that you 1st think and are widely used on escape routes - may out-of-town sheds will use these doors and particular between back and front of house.
Some retailers will use them to get around the 2000 sq metres for sprinklers (not Scotland though).
if you TD's are fine and there is adequate mean of escape - I see not reason not to use them as I say they are very common in all types of buildings.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi jprictor, If my memory serves me correct industrial roller shutter doors including domestic gates, etc. have a trim pot/adjustment built in that allows the service engineer to adjust when closing to minimise the crushing effect, however this does have its drawbacks shence IR beams were introduced, again this can be added to any automation system no matter how old.(should take no more than an hour to install and test) http://www.designcurial....ors-for-automatic-doors/On a different note, is it possible that the fire closing roller shutter should be “opening” instead? Q. How would the Fire Department access this if there was a fire and no power? Zane
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks all for your helpful advice. It seems they are going to manage the issues with notices, and induction with a 20 sec delay, noise and flashing lights. Therefore management decision has been made, this I have recorded for the record but will consider raising the issue on every visit
JP
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I still stand by my viewpoint #8 which is also expressed in Approved Document B page 132. http://www.planningporta...s/br/BR_App_Doc_B_v2.pdfAnd section 14 & 38 RRFSO. I accept that the OP does not state if the shutter is on a means of escape, however, my comments are made relating to previous posts stating that this is quite common. Common or not roller shutter doors should not be used on escape routes that are initiated by the fire alarms.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Toe wrote:I still stand by my viewpoint #8 which is also expressed in Approved Document B page 132. http://www.planningporta...s/br/BR_App_Doc_B_v2.pdfAnd section 14 & 38 RRFSO. I accept that the OP does not state if the shutter is on a means of escape, however, my comments are made relating to previous posts stating that this is quite common. Common or not roller shutter doors should not be used on escape routes that are initiated by the fire alarms. Not on an escape route JP
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.