Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
IanDakin  
#1 Posted : 23 July 2015 18:33:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi At what point does ordinary maintenance become a construction project under CDM 2015?
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 23 July 2015 19:10:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Ian The definition of 'construction work' is contained within regulation 2.-(1) as per below. So, if you take (a) and (e) as an example, most maintenance work is deemed to be a construction activity and will fall within the ambit of the 2015 regulations - harsh maybe, but there it is. “construction work” means the carrying out of any building, civil engineering or engineering construction work and includes— (a) the construction, alteration, conversion, fitting out, commissioning, renovation, repair, upkeep, redecoration or other maintenance (including cleaning which involves the use of water or an abrasive at high pressure, or the use of corrosive or toxic substances), de-commissioning, demolition or dismantling of a structure; (b) the preparation for an intended structure, including site clearance, exploration, investigation (but not site survey) and excavation (but not pre-construction archaeological investigations), and the clearance or preparation of the site or structure for use or occupation at its conclusion; (c) the assembly on site of prefabricated elements to form a structure or the disassembly on site of the prefabricated elements which, immediately before such disassembly, formed a structure; (d) the removal of a structure, or of any product or waste resulting from demolition or dismantling of a structure, or from disassembly of prefabricated elements which immediately before such disassembly formed such a structure; (e) the installation, commissioning, maintenance, repair or removal of mechanical, electrical, gas, compressed air, hydraulic, telecommunications, computer or similar services which are normally fixed within or to a structure, Ray
Jimothy999  
#3 Posted : 24 July 2015 10:12:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jimothy999

On a course I attended a month or two back the instructor had contacted the HSE to discuss this point and was told the following. The HSE are taking a 'if it quacks like a duck' approach to determining when maintenance work should be covered by CDM. Essentially, if the maintenance work is on fixed equipment, involves the use of construction materials and techniques then it is likely to be covered by CDM. So changing the oil on a fixed generator is not CDM, but removing the ceiling in order to lift out a major component by crane for inspection and repair will be. Hope this helps.
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 24 July 2015 12:22:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

RayRapp wrote:
most maintenance work is deemed to be a construction activity
I disagree Ray. The great majority of maintenance on fixed plant and equipment comprises routine servicing, component replacement, testing, inspection, etc. CDM is intended to apply only when the job entails significant removal or replacement of fixed plant or ancillaries (ducting etc.) - i.e. a "Project."
Ron Hunter  
#5 Posted : 24 July 2015 13:41:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

As an aside, we had a similar in-work discussion the other day on the subject of grave digging. Applying "quack like a duck", CDM would appear to apply: mini 360 excavator used, shoring, deep(ish) excavation, risk of entrapment, bio hazards, HAVS (jackhammer if we hit rock), Work at Height, protecting the public etc. Do we intend to apply CDM, CPP, Project rules etc. to digging graves? NO! Next crazy step would be guard rails around the internment during the service....... SENSIBLE. PROPORTIONATE. PLEASE!
chris42  
#6 Posted : 24 July 2015 13:43:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Where does it state & qualify "significant" Ron ? I read it as maintenance, being all maintenance. Indeed in item "a" above it includes upkeep and redecoration. Is there guidance that qualifies it ? Chris
RayRapp  
#7 Posted : 24 July 2015 14:52:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Ron I am only quoting (not quacking) from the regulations not on hearsay. I don't know anything about these ducks as they have not been included in the regs or HSE guidance.
KDP  
#8 Posted : 24 July 2015 14:54:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KDP

Ian – ordinary maintenance of what? Of a building? Of fixed plant? However ludicrous one may think they are, the Regs (to me) are clear; construction work….”includes” (a) the construction, alteration, conversion, fitting out, commissioning, renovation, repair, upkeep, redecoration or other maintenance….. of a structure. structure means “any building….” and “any reference to a structure includes part of a structure”. For instance; redecorating a door or a window is ordinary maintenance. The door/window is part of a structure, the structure is called a building. So, redecorating a door/window is upkeep, redocoration and maintenance of a structure and is therefore ‘construction work’ and CDM Regs apply. If just one door, then the ‘contruction site’ will be just over 1m². Building a sky-scraper is ‘construction work’ too and the same Regs apply. Does a painter & decorator quack? No? But at what stage might he quack? When there are a flock of them?
Jimothy999  
#9 Posted : 24 July 2015 16:05:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jimothy999

Ron Hunter wrote:
As an aside, we had a similar in-work discussion the other day on the subject of grave digging. Applying "quack like a duck", CDM would appear to apply: mini 360 excavator used, shoring, deep(ish) excavation, risk of entrapment, bio hazards, HAVS (jackhammer if we hit rock), Work at Height, protecting the public etc. Do we intend to apply CDM, CPP, Project rules etc. to digging graves? NO! Next crazy step would be guard rails around the internment during the service....... SENSIBLE. PROPORTIONATE. PLEASE!
Point well made Ron, however the duck quote was in respect to CDM applying to maintenance, not the regs in general.
zodiacmindwarp  
#10 Posted : 24 July 2015 16:19:26(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
zodiacmindwarp

Ron Hunter wrote:
As an aside, we had a similar in-work discussion the other day on the subject of grave digging. Applying "quack like a duck", CDM would appear to apply: mini 360 excavator used, shoring, deep(ish) excavation, risk of entrapment, bio hazards, HAVS (jackhammer if we hit rock), Work at Height, protecting the public etc. Do we intend to apply CDM, CPP, Project rules etc. to digging graves? NO! Next crazy step would be guard rails around the internment during the service....... SENSIBLE. PROPORTIONATE. PLEASE!
So on your sites using a mini digger to excavate and using a jack hammer you would not apply CDM? Bimey!
chas  
#11 Posted : 24 July 2015 16:23:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chas

In response to Ron's comment about grave digging, (and out of interest), why is grave digging exempt from CDM? If I was to excavate a piece of ground for a storage tank I would apply CDM in full. Does the HSE exempt grave digging?
Ron Hunter  
#12 Posted : 24 July 2015 17:09:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I knew I shouldn't have mentioned grave digging - thread hijack! Sorry! Back to topic, and in the context of clarity of the CDM Regs: In terms of definition of key terms under discussion here, I posit that there is little or no change from CDM 2007 - 2015. This direct from HSE web page: http://www.hse.gov.uk/co...tion/cdm/faq/general.htm "What is construction work?" "The following are not considered to be construction work: General maintenance of fixed plant, except when it is part of other construction work or involves substantial dismantling or alteration of fixed plant large enough to be a structure in its own right, eg structural alteration of a large silo, complex chemical plant, power station generator or large boiler." OK, OK, that's on the CDM2007 pages. But if was the truth then, doesn't it still apply? Don't eat the Gummi Bears............
Ron Hunter  
#13 Posted : 24 July 2015 17:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

zodiacmindwarp wrote:
So on your sites using a mini digger to excavate and using a jack hammer you would not apply CDM? Bimey!
I'd apply the principles of CDM - principles already enshrined in other Legislation. I'm not building or maintaining a structure, this isn't a 'project', there is no "design" and it would be extremely bad taste to hand over a Health and Safety File. ;-)
chris42  
#14 Posted : 24 July 2015 17:25:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Just re read my post I mean no offence Ron, I genuinely want to clarify this as we bring in contractors to carry out maintenance of fixed equipment, so want to fully understand the extent it applies. Another thread on a different part of the site indicates a statement from the HSE. All I could find was L153, which on this is as helpful as a chocolate tea pot. I have printed its 90 pages for a re read this weekend. Is there further information on this particular aspect. If this legislation is effectively a copy into UK law what happens in other countries ? Do they have a CPP for changing oil or a bearing in a machine (or some other worn component). Does mechanical in part "e" from above actually mean door and shutters in a building not the production equipment as I thought it did. Could someone hurry up and get prosecuted so we have a better understanding (well it is Friday). Could someone from the HSE take pity on us all and formally provide clarification and stop UK businesses tying ourselves in knots (not a Friday comment). Would the entity IOSH like to comment. This is crazy, or perhaps I am now. Chris
RayRapp  
#15 Posted : 24 July 2015 21:23:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Grave digging aside, the maintenance aspect of CDM 2015 is as clear as can be. In the definition section 2.-1 of the regulations it mentions 'maintenance' several times, whether fixed to a structure or not. Furthermore, section (a) states...commissioning, renovation, repair, upkeep, redecoration or other maintenance... How much clearer can that be? Whether general repairs and maintenance is in keeping with the spirit of CDM is a moot point. In my opinion it should not have been included. The HSE can huff, bluff and quack all they like, that fact is they have included activities which go far beyond the remit of TMCSD and they know it.
Ron Hunter  
#16 Posted : 25 July 2015 13:53:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

My post at #10. HSE have previously provided published guidance and clarified the extent of the definition, yet chosen not to include this in the revised L guide. I urge those with interests to save some screen shots of those CDM2007 pages - they will be taken down eventually. It could provide vital defence should some over-zealous inspector choose to play silly beggars further down the line........
philb  
#17 Posted : 26 July 2015 06:43:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
philb

At the end of May 2015 in their construction e bulletin the Hse did issue a clarification of maintenance and reverted to their reference to fixed plant included in the 2007 acop but removed, mistakenly in my view, from the guidance on the 2015 regulations.
IanDakin  
#18 Posted : 27 July 2015 07:45:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
IanDakin

Hi All I read the regulation prior to posting, i also attended a seminar days before the regs came into force and I have read the client duties in CITB guidance. As far as I can see the Regs state maintenance is construction work. But I then can't see how as a Client you apply all the Client Duties to someone coming in to service your dock levelers? And guidance does not cover this. In terms of CDM 2007, can this be used to justify interpretation of the 2015 regs. I can't see that it does, as the 2015 Regs supersede the 2007 regs. Thanks for all the input so far. Ian
chris42  
#19 Posted : 27 July 2015 10:03:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Ok the old L144, does exclude ( see below) general maintenance, and seems appropriate to me. However when you read the wording in the latest Legal document or the regulations themselves, there is no qualification. I guess you can argue that through lack of information the old definition applies. However as noted above the 2015 regulations replaced not amended the 2007 version. So nothing concrete (pun intended). So when replacing the headstock bearing in a lathe bolted to the floor, using two contractors ( one to electrically isolate and one to change the bearing) it does not fall under CDM. Maintenance of something like an escalator ( in a shopping centre etc) could be argued is an integral part of the building, so does apply. Not sure about having a new boiler installed as we did ( before the regs changed). Tried searching for e bulletin and other releases from HSE, but alas nothing. There was reference that the HSE had feedback during the consultation period that an ACOP would be useful, so are considering creating such. You never know they may not adopt the "ladybird" style of writing and so may be useful. Chris From L144 Construction work 13 Construction work is defined in the Regulations. The following are not construction work as defined: (a) putting up and taking down marquees and similar tents designed to be re-erected at various locations; (b) general maintenance of fixed plant, except when this is done as part of other construction work, or it involves substantial dismantling or alteration of fixed plant which is large enough to be a structure in its own right, for example structural alteration of a large silo; complex chemical plant; power station generator or large boiler; PPS - Not sure where I stand with the grave digging scenario : Reg 22 states (c) no person is buried or trapped in an excavation ( sorry my poor black sense of humour)
James Robinson  
#20 Posted : 27 July 2015 10:55:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
James Robinson

I do think underneath the veil of fog there is a lot of smoke and mirrors when it comes to CDM 2015 The problem I see with CDM 2015 is that it is prescriptive, BUT, what does it really add that we don't do already under other Regulations?? Is a good method statement the equivalent of a Construction Phase Plan - I think yes. Is a good risk assessment for working in an excavation, the same as meeting the CDM 2015 requirements, or for that matter those in the Work at Height Regs - again I think yes. I view CDM 2015, as a kind of summary of the current Regulations to date in connection with "construction". If you were doing it ok before, then I'm pretty sure you will be ok with the CDM 2015. If a contractor hits a power cable, disturbs asbestos, falls of a roof, has no risk assessment, etc., etc., will the contractor and client be prosecuted under CDM 2015,........ or the Managment Regs, CAR, WAH, etc.........does it really matter what Regulation has been breeched? They could all be taken under the generic duties in HASAWA 74 anyway. I know that this will ultimately be determined by the Courts, but if you are complying with duties pre CDM 2015, managing the work, co-ordinating the work, etc........
RayRapp  
#21 Posted : 27 July 2015 11:05:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Maybe...but it's interesting from Chris' post and extract from L144 (ACoP CDM 2007) where (a) has been excluded in the definition of construction work, it's my understanding that temporary demountable structures (TDS) which includes marquees, etc, are now included in CDM 2015. So it begs the question - what, if any relevance has CDM 2007 to CDM 2015?
jay  
#22 Posted : 27 July 2015 11:32:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

From HSE News Bulletin Source:- http://content.govdelive.../UKHSE/bulletins/1069056 Q. I have a term contract with a maintenance or FM contractor. (Typically 1- 3 years). Do I need to notify this as a project under CDM 2015? A. A term appointment by contract does not in itself trigger notification. CDM 2015 requires “projects” to be notified. If the term contract includes work which is deemed to be a single project, and the project lasts more than 30 days, and at any time during that period there are more than 20 workers on site at one time, or lasts 500 person days, then the project becomes notifiable. Separate maintenance tasks carried out at separate locations, on separate buildings, do not automatically accumulate to form a single project. Note that notification is now a stand-alone duty; it does not trigger any other duties. Whether the project is notifiable, or not, as above, a PC is required for those projects where more than one contractor is, or is likely to be, involved. In these cases a PD should also be appointed, but a contractor (probably the PC) may well have the necessary skills knowledge and experience to act as PD in those cases where the design work, or pre construction planning, is straightforward. A PC on smaller jobs needs to have a co-ordinating, planning, and managing role, but does not need to be on site or in close supervision, all the time. The emphasis HSE expects is on management, not on direct supervision. It is the contractors’ duty to provide supervision. A term- contractor may act as PC, if they have the skills knowledge and experience, or the role can be given to a suitably qualified contractor who is brought in. This decision is in the gift of the client, who needs to take into account the risks of the work involved and the capabilities of his or her term contractor.
thanks 1 user thanked jay for this useful post.
colintalbot on 21/11/2019(UTC)
chris42  
#23 Posted : 27 July 2015 11:36:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Thanks Jay The other Question on that link is more for our issue and is dated 28/05/2015 :- Q. Does CDM 2015 apply to all maintenance work? A. The definition of maintenance work has not changed. If the task in hand looks like construction work, requires construction skills and uses construction materials, it is construction work. General maintenance of fixed plant which mainly involves mechanical adjustments, replacing parts or lubrication is unlikely to be construction work.
jay  
#24 Posted : 27 July 2015 11:58:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

The HSE was between a rock and a hard place in that they had to transpose fully the Temporary & Mobile Construction Sites Directive that does not have "Exceptions" . http://eur-lex.europa.eu...X:31992L0057&from=EN Annexe 1 is referred to as the "Non Exhaustive list of Building and Civil Engineering Works as in Article 2(A) of the Directive The HSE has been highlighting from the outset that the approach to CDM 2015 compliance has to be proportional.
James Robinson  
#25 Posted : 27 July 2015 11:58:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
James Robinson

# 21 So it begs the question - what, if any relevance has CDM 2007 to CDM 2015? None - see Reg 38. The 2007 Regulations are revoked. I know case law, etc., etc., will carry over, but in effect CDM 2015 is a new animal.
xRockape  
#26 Posted : 27 July 2015 11:59:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
xRockape

Temporary demountable Structures do Fall under CDM 15
Ron Hunter  
#27 Posted : 27 July 2015 12:15:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Well, HSE did suggest they might issue an ACoP................. but I'm not holding my breath. The chance of the OP query ever being tested legally seem remote. My concern is more about the Industry knee-jerking to over-interpretation and customer demands and creating additional paperwork where the overarching 'proportionate' principle suggests none is required. p.s. don't be kidded into thinking the UK have finally (at third time of asking) transposed the parent TMCSD verbatim. There are significant differences in the duty holder arrangements.
RayRapp  
#28 Posted : 27 July 2015 13:49:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Ron Hunter wrote:
Well, HSE did suggest they might issue an ACoP................. but I'm not holding my breath. The chance of the OP query ever being tested legally seem remote. My concern is more about the Industry knee-jerking to over-interpretation and customer demands and creating additional paperwork where the overarching 'proportionate' principle suggests none is required. p.s. don't be kidded into thinking the UK have finally (at third time of asking) transposed the parent TMCSD verbatim. There are significant differences in the duty holder arrangements.
Indeed Ron, but there again the HSE have been accused of knee-jerking, not being proportionate, sensible, etc.
Ron Hunter  
#29 Posted : 27 July 2015 15:26:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I'm going to stick with what HSE said for 2007 must hold true for 2015 = 'General maintenance of fixed plant not considered to be construction work' (from #12) The definition of construction work (other than an archaeological qualification at Reg 2(1)(b)) remains materially unaltered - it's otherwise verbatim. The interpretation and opinion of the regulator is surely similarly unaltered. Seems a decent argument to me.
chris42  
#30 Posted : 27 July 2015 16:06:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

The link provided by Jay at #22 ( also provided by Ray on another thread) dated 28/05/2015, is a statement they (HSE) would find it hard to back track from. Which does support What Ron has been saying. I have made a number of copies in differing formats of this, so any overly enthusiastic HSE person can be shown if necessary. Legislation and current guidance is woolly to say the least, but I doubt there would be any formal trouble if you can demonstrate you were acting on their poor advice. That is unless they want to make the statement that any information on their web site can not be trusted. In the other thread Ray has also provided another link which does bring up more issues as this will still not be clear for certain vagaries. There is a fine line and exactly were that line is, will still be open to interpretation.
RayRapp  
#31 Posted : 28 July 2015 08:30:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

In summary, the maintenance aspect of CDM 2015 is as clear as mud. Ron seems to be of the opinion what was good for the 2007 iteration is also good for 2015 - I don't agree. CDM 2007 is dead. Furthermore, to say that the definition of construction work has not materially changed is also not correct. As pointed out in my earlier post, temporary demountable structures are now included in CDM 2015. Oh well, interesting debate.
Ron Hunter  
#32 Posted : 28 July 2015 10:48:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

For me, the link provided by Jay (#22) and discussed by Chris42 at #23 provides sufficient comfort that the HSE maintain their qualification of the scope and extent of CDM to maintenance work; i.e. what was good for 2007 is good for 2015. Unfortunate that this clarification is not more evident and obvious on HSE CDM pages. Thanks Jay. Ray, if we were all of the same opinion there wouldn't be much going on in this Forum in the way of interesting debate! I am puzzled though by your assertion that 'demountable structures' is something new for 2015. I see no change to the definition (reg2) of 'construction work' in that respect.
RayRapp  
#33 Posted : 28 July 2015 12:48:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Ron, I agree debate is good. I have no issues with differing opinions, nor do you it would appear, by correcting me at post #4. The post at #19 provided by Chris illustrates the ACoP 2007 L144 where the definition of what is NOT construction work differs with CDM 2015 as follows: From L144 Construction work 13 Construction work is defined in the Regulations. The following are not construction work as defined: (a) putting up and taking down marquees and similar tents designed to be re-erected at various locations;
gotogmca  
#34 Posted : 28 July 2015 13:09:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
gotogmca

I think getting back to the original post "At what point does ordinary maintenance become a construction project under CDM 2015?" if I have read correctly most discussion seems to be about the definition of the term construction. For CDM2015 it is important to remember that the time of the project comes into consideration i.e. a project is notifiable if it (a) last longer than 30 working days and have more than 20 workers working simultaneously at any point in the project; or (b) exceed 500 person days. For the vast majority of maintenance projects I think this would mean you are not under CDM but you would be advised to work to CDM principles.
mikecarr  
#35 Posted : 28 July 2015 13:20:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mikecarr

IanDakin wrote:
Hi At what point does ordinary maintenance become a construction project under CDM 2015?
we work along the lines that if it look and feels s like a constuction project then it's probablly A CDM project
Ron Hunter  
#36 Posted : 28 July 2015 14:40:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

#34: You need to brush-up on CDM. Notification is an entirely separate issue. #35: CDM applies to all construction work. This has been the case since 2007.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.