IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Principal Designer - Flouting the 2015 Regulations
Rank: Super forum user
|
In a nutshell Ray.. Good article, thanks for the link. We in the h&s profession are not the only ones struggling to interpret and implement the regs!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Alfasev wrote:In Reg 2 Interpretation the PD is the designer appointed under regulation 5(1) (a). I agree with RayRapp however the HSE appears to be backtracking from the idea that the PD must be a designer on the project. Firstly they removed it from the draft guidance and will not confirm their position. They simply quote the regulations!
'Backtracking' how? I don't think the regs have ever said that the PD must be a designer on the project. Neither the draft nor the final regs said that. Some people assumed it, but you can hardly blame the HSE if people make assumptions that aren't what the regs actually say. I don't think it was ever an idea the HSE had - it's not in any of their documents that I've seen, anyway. One guidance document, in the draft version, incorrectly said that the PD should be a designer on the project, and that was corrected in the final version. To my mind, that's an error in the draft of that document, not a backtracking in the regs.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Principal Designer - Flouting the 2015 Regulations
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.