Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
mssy  
#1 Posted : 04 August 2015 03:22:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-33762806 It will be interesting to see the findings of any inquiry to this difficult lifting operation
johnmurray  
#2 Posted : 04 August 2015 11:42:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

It would be interesting to read the method statement. Possibly they will unearth it from the waste bin it was deposited in, then open it and read it!
achrn  
#3 Posted : 04 August 2015 14:00:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

JohnMurray wrote:
It would be interesting to read the method statement. Possibly they will unearth it from the waste bin it was deposited in, then open it and read it!
Why do you say they weren't following a method statement? The larger of the two is large even for mobile cranes (it has the outrigger configuration, and I think the axle configuration too, of a Demag AC1600, which is a 500 tonne lift, of which there aren't very many about). The one that toppled first is a smaller model, but it's still at the large end of mobile crane size range. Using such equipment suggests a lift that will be planned a reasonably long time in advance, and tends to imply a reasonably planned lift.
alexmccreadie13  
#4 Posted : 04 August 2015 14:18:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
alexmccreadie13

Ladies Gents this is in Holland and they are very good at planning lifts through having 2 of the biggest heavy lift crane companies in the world. This is a Tandem lift and all about weight transference between the cranes which has to be strictly controlled. If it is not serious consequences? We could be discussing equipment failure ,accessory failure or lack of control of the cranes. It is far to early and nearly impossible to determine at this stage why. Fortunately no fatalities but quite a lot of possibly seriously injured. Ta Alex
grim72  
#5 Posted : 04 August 2015 15:13:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
grim72

I'm guessing the fact it appears to be taking place on pontoons will be the major contributing factor? Not sure how easy it would be to find out/calculate the SWL of them and then factoring in the effect of the movement of the cranes and their load on top of it.
mssy  
#6 Posted : 04 August 2015 22:12:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
mssy

alexmccreadie13 wrote:
Ladies Gents this is in Holland and they are very good at planning lifts through having 2 of the biggest heavy lift crane companies in the world.
This is exactly why I am so surprised it happened here. Plus Holland are leaders in marine civil engineering, so the lifting & replacing of a relatively simple load (bridge part)- albeit from a barge and in a confined space - is not unusual in a country which is largely reclaimed land below sea level. Lets hope any investigation is made public (and in English!!)
boblewis  
#7 Posted : 05 August 2015 14:57:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

This one is unusual in that the larger crane has overturned. It may well be therefore that the pontoon use has affected the dynamic loading pattern. We shall see soon we hope.
achrn  
#8 Posted : 05 August 2015 18:49:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

boblewis wrote:
This one is unusual in that the larger crane has overturned. It may well be therefore that the pontoon use has affected the dynamic loading pattern. We shall see soon we hope.
In the video I saw, what looked to be the larger of the two cranes (the one closest to camera at the start here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-33764760) only toppled when it was hit by the falling deck panel after the first crane was already most of the way to the ground. It seems to me that the deck panel knocked / dragged an outrigger off the side of the barge.
johnmurray  
#9 Posted : 06 August 2015 08:25:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

aud  
#10 Posted : 06 August 2015 10:08:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
aud

achrn  
#11 Posted : 06 August 2015 14:15:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

JohnMurray wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHlfK0Ed8Zk
That's the same video as the BBC used, and so my same comment applies - the larger of the two cranes only toppled when its outrigger was pushed off the barge by the falling bridge deck panel. The aerial photo on http://www.constructionw...turns-to-crane-collapse/ confirms that the crane that first toppled was indeed the smaller of the two. The larger still looks like a Demag AC1600 to me, I don't recognise the smaller - it's some years since I was actually specifying/hiring cranes.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.