Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Bragg32295  
#1 Posted : 18 August 2015 09:14:37(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Bragg32295

A Company in the electronics sector has followed the HSE Health Surveillance guidelines including risk assessment. No chemicals are used which require health surveillance according to the COSHH regulations although sensitisers are used (3M Primer 94 and PC5343 and PC6144 Activator). A noise survey indicates two mandatory hearing protection zones and hearing protection is provided. The Company has decided to withdraw an offer of occupational health surveillance to employees. Please let me have your advice, comments and opinions.
Peter_OC  
#2 Posted : 18 August 2015 10:01:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Peter_OC

A good occupational health service is essential to the effective management of workplace health without even touching on the possible effects of safety culture within the business.
The company have identified that there is a risk to employees hearing and have put in place hearing protection zones and provided hearing protection, by removing the occupational health service for employees who work in these areas they have removed the monitoring function of how effective the control to noise exposure is.
Bragg32295  
#3 Posted : 18 August 2015 10:26:48(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Bragg32295

Thank you Peter_OC - I'm very grateful for your helpful comments.
stevedm  
#4 Posted : 18 August 2015 10:27:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

I think you have to be careful with the words here...I'm not sure that they are withdrawing as this would be against the Overall process...they may not have a requirement to provide statuatory health surveiellence which is a wee bit different.
Bragg32295  
#5 Posted : 18 August 2015 10:48:55(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Bragg32295

Thanks SteveDM. It looks like there's no statutory requirement for surveillance however having no OH surveillance at all may impact on insurances and social factors (duty of care)? Also with no monitoring the Company would have no data to rely on following potentially fraudulent claims?
Bragg32295  
#6 Posted : 18 August 2015 14:09:39(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Bragg32295

Any other comments and suggestions gratefully accepted (worker generated Kaizen/improvement initiative).
chris.packham  
#7 Posted : 21 August 2015 09:17:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

In the sixth edition of the ACoP for COSHH HSE set some modified requirements regarding health surveillance:

Examples where health surveillance is appropriate under the criteria in regulation 11(2)(b) are:
where there have been previous cases of work-related ill health in the workforce/place;
where there is reliance on PPE, eg gloves or respirators, as an exposure control measure; eg printers wearing gloves to protect against solvents used during press cleaning, or paint sprayers using two-pack paints wearing respirators to prevent asthma. Even with the closest supervision there is no guarantee that PPE will be effective at all times;
where there is evidence of ill health in jobs within the industry; eg frequent or prolonged contact with water (termed ‘wet-working’) causing dermatitis in hairdressers and healthcare workers, or breathing in mists from chrome plating baths causing chrome ulcers in platers.
Paragraph 238 amplifies this:
This is not a definitive or exhaustive list and there will be many other instances where health surveillance is required. Employers will need to seek information or advice on the specific health risks identified in the risk assessment, or through any topic-specific HSE guidance, trade associations or other professional sources.

If you have sensitisers present and there is potential for contact (skin as well as inhalation, and skin contact can be airborne and cause skin reactions at below the WEL) then perhaps it would be wise to obtain OH advice on what you might need.

Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.