Rank: Super forum user
|
I know one answer to this but would like other people's opinions please.
Who should be compiling the H&S File and what format should the information be in when handed over to the Client?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Usually the PD, but many jobs I work on the Client acts as PD and we (the PC) manage it for them as part of the contract.
Its ongoing, but inevitably there is always a mad panic tidying it up before sign off.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Th e format is usually decided by the company putting the information together and would be found in the quality management plan for the project. Clients sometimes stipulate the format and have this put in the t and c's
As a rule of thumb anything that affects safety during the future construction, maintenance, demolition, de-planting or anything found when undertaking the construction residual risk register should be put in the H and S file. An idea or two below but not exhaustive
It could When putting together the health and safety file, you should consider including information
about each of the following where they are relevant to the health and safety of any future
construction work. The level of detail should allow the likely risks to be identified and
addressed by those carrying out the work:
(a) a brief description of the work carried out;
(b) any residual hazards which remain and how they have been dealt with (for
example surveys or other information concerning asbestos; contaminated land; water
bearing strata; buried services etc);
(c) key structural principles (for example, bracing, sources of substantial stored
energy - including pre- or post-tensioned members) and safe working loads for floors
and roofs, particularly where these may preclude placing scaffolding or heavy
machinery there;
(d) hazardous materials used (for example lead paint; pesticides; special coatings
which should not be burnt off etc);
(e) information regarding the removal or dismantling of installed plant and equipment
(for example any special arrangements for lifting, order or other special instructions
for dismantling etc);
(f) health and safety information about equipment provided for cleaning or
maintaining the structure;
(g) the nature, location and markings of significant services, including underground
cables; gas supply equipment; fire-fighting services etc;
(h) information and as-built drawings of the structure, its plant and equipment (for
example, the means of safe access to and from service voids, fire doors and
compartmentalisation etc).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
21 years on and this question is still routinely raised in CDM circles. Let's hope CDM2015 finally bears fruit!
The format should be as per Client's requirements (the 8 point listing above is a decent template) and kept and updated (hard copy, or these days preferably electronically, and even better, web-based) also in accordance with Client's requirements.
Who should inform (via PCI) as to what will likely be required and in what format? The Principal Designer.
Who should collate and update it? Anyone with sufficient instruction.
Who should make sure it's done - the PD (and the Client)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Ron
Agree
By bearing fruit....i hope you mean good bye and farewell forever to the CDM-C and the placing of the design management aspect to where it belongs [the clue is in the title (Principal Designer)]. The CDM-C seemed to morph into a creature that operated in the "construction phase" were the origional directive never intended them to be.....and to be quite frank generally added little if no value.
Also the "decent template" can go on forever dependent on whatever the construction project is at the end of the build phase....a hospital...a power station...an oil refinery...a high rise business centre ....they all have different residual risk and a need to design in safety.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Ron
Agree
By bearing fruit....i hope you mean good bye and farewell forever to the CDM-C and the placing of the design management aspect to where it belongs [the clue is in the title (Principal Designer)]. The CDM-C seemed to morph into a creature that operated in the "construction phase" were the original directive never intended them to be.....and to be quite frank generally added little if no value.
Also the "decent template" can go on forever dependent on whatever the construction project is at the end of the build phase....a hospital...a power station...an oil refinery...a high rise business centre ....they all have different residual risk and a need to design in safety.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.