Rank: Forum user
|
Client insists this is classed as lifting equipment so needs a 6 month inspection
BS EN 360:1993
Personal protective equipment against falls from a height. Retractable type fall arresters
Are the correct ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I doubt that you could make a real case for it being lifting equipment or an accessory.
However, it is part of the PPE set up. Without looking at any legislation or guidance I would like to think that if my life could depend on this piece of equipment that it was thoroughly inspected at least as often as a set of chains – every six months.
Indeed, taking the LOLER lead, and de-rating it by 50% for persons, I would be more comfortable again with three monthly.
We, as a company, go six monthly – and colour code in line with our lifting accessories.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Paul B wrote:Client insists this is classed as lifting equipment so needs a 6 month inspection
BS EN 360:1993
Personal protective equipment against falls from a height. Retractable type fall arresters
Are the correct ?
http://www.hse.gov.uk/wo...inery/lift-equipment.htm
"Equipment not covered by LOLER
"LOLER is wide in its scope and some equipment might appear to be 'lifting' and therefore thought to be covered by LOLER. However, there are some notable exceptions that are not covered by LOLER, including :
...
"fall arrest ropes"
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is probably due to the recommend 6 monthly detailed inspection of fall arrest PPE (http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg367.pdf) and it's quite common to get the Insurance company that does the LOLER checks to do this at the same time. I would imagine that's where your Client has got this idea from.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is a bit more complicated IMHO; these are not just "ropes" they are equipment which MUST work (I am thinking of inertia reel types). When I worked for a scaffold company we treated them as being LOLER accessories - remember, their primary use is to SUSPEND ie "LIFT"? a person in the event of a fall. I fact in the dusty environment we worked in we just renewed them after 6 months as stripping and servicing them was as costly. What I am saying is, you need to consider this carefully and make a judgement - and record your reasoning. Turn this around - you don't inspect, someone falls and is injured, what will your defence be?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The fall arrest equiment does not classify as "lifing equiment" and is specifically refered to in the new LOLER guidance issued this year as not coming under its scope. Politely tell your client that you will be carrying out 6 monthly detailed inspections as they are covered by other legislation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You have to be careful as some retractable type fall arrester have winches built into them and therefore come LOLER.
There are requirements under the PPE and WAH regs (arguably PUWER) to inspect and maintain equipment. Therefore for retractable type fall arrester that does not come under LOLER, which is most of them, you do need some sort of inspection, maintenance regime. If the manufacture recommend load testing then it should also be carries out.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks All.
A lot clearer now.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.