Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Psycho  
#1 Posted : 17 December 2015 11:46:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Psycho

Had a good talk at work today reference the NEBOSH Certificate

one person said that, this qualification is ok for someone who is starting out and even good in a very low risk area like an office and that someone carrying out a primary health and safety role such as on a building site or warehouse,should have a higher qualification e.g. NEBOSH Diploma or equivalent.

This got the Cert holders in a rant. The Cert holders, with over 25 years’ experience were even more annoyed when someone said IOSH does not recognise the NEBOSH Certificate as sufficient qualification for people in a primary health and safety role

What are your thoughts on this -is the certificate the qualification for a professional or is it only a rung on the ladder of hope

I seem to remember that there was a case when the judge said a higher qualification was needed, Can’t seem to find it
Colossians 1:14  
#2 Posted : 17 December 2015 11:54:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Colossians 1:14

I've come across brilliant H&S professionals without NEBOSH but loads of experience in their field and poor ones that are MIOSH'ed CMIOSH'ed up to eyeballs.

I've also come across well certified and IOSH'ed professionals that are brilliant!
walker  
#3 Posted : 17 December 2015 12:03:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

It was a Sainsbury warehouse.

IOSH accept the Cert (together with a min of 3 years experience) as sufficent for Tech grade.

NEBOSH is at pains to stress that the Cert is not a professional H&S qualification but a foundation.

Like most folks I started with the Cert.
25 years later I realise how little I knew about H&S just after I had passed it when I thought I knew it all.
Stedman  
#4 Posted : 17 December 2015 12:11:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Stedman

Before getting involved in this debate, it is worth going onto the NEBOSH web-site and examining the scope of this qualification. See: www.nebosh.org.uk/qualif...ult.asp?cref=26&ct=2

Which stated "What kind of people take the NEBOSH National General Certificate?

Managers, supervisors and staff from all types of organisations who need a broad understanding of health and safety issues. The certificate helps them manage risks effectively. Many people take the NEBOSH National General Certificate as a first step in a career in health and safety. It provides a valuable overview, and is a sound basis for further professional study".


"What kind of people take the NEBOSH National Construction Certificate?

The NEBOSH National Construction Certificate is aimed at Supervisors, Managers and those with a role under the Construction Design and Management regulations 2015 within the construction industry who are required to ensure that activities under their control are undertaken safely. It is likely to prove useful for those concerned with the management of buildings who may need to ensure that contractors are working safely. The qualification is also appropriate for supervisors and managers working in other industries such as utilities, and even broadcasting, where temporary workplaces are a feature of their activities".
walker  
#5 Posted : 17 December 2015 12:15:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

jodieclark1510  
#6 Posted : 17 December 2015 13:00:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jodieclark1510

I worked in a large distribution centre and was very heavily involved in health and safety with the General cert and that I was my first safety role. It depends more on the person and how they approach it. I didn't say I knew everything, if I felt or thought something I would check it out first- exactly the same as I do now and will do for the rest of my working life. We all have to start somewhere, and just because you might not continue academically doesn't mean you stop learning. I honestly don't understand why people feel the need to rile others up
imponderabilius  
#7 Posted : 17 December 2015 13:27:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
imponderabilius

I worked in oil and gas, currently in marine industries with NEBOSH NGC and TechIOSH. I feel I'm learning all the time but never felt I'm not competent enough to do the jobs. I had a lot of support from my previous managers what helped me to gain hands on experience.
I'm still considering doing diploma at some point in the future but my basic qualifications helped me to greatly progress my career in H&S over the last 2 years.
Invictus  
#8 Posted : 17 December 2015 13:30:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

I think it depends on what you want it for, if it is for your own workplace the certificate would be fine. You would be competent in your role. I think you would struggle to get work outside of that role.

Like Colossians 1:14 I have met some people who with the certificate who were great practitioners and supposedly competent CMIOSH who would struggle with the concept of what end to hold a hammer to knock a nail in.
JohnW  
#9 Posted : 17 December 2015 14:31:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

Psycho, as walker said above, IOSH DO recognise Nebosh NGC as part of getting appointed as TechIOSH.

Whether you are NGC or CMIOSH, your competency must be assessed on what you have done SINCE getting the qualification.

For H&S I have only NGC (I'm now over 60 and can't see a benefit of going further) and that has been sufficient for me to get consultancy business for 8 years with SMEs.

For much of my H&S knowledge over the last 8 years I am very much self-taught based on experience gained, the benefit of working with a lot of good engineers, designers, fire officers etc during those years, working with good builders AND with bad builders, networking with other professionals in IOSH, documenting CPD, and regular reference to HSE publications ACoPs, HSGs, INDGs etc etc.

Contributing to this forum is very rewarding and informative, nobody has said I talk b*llocks here (or at customers) but of course I know I have talked b*llocks on occasion, we all do, we are human and H&S is not black and white.

As Invictus has indicated, whether you go NGC only or progress from that depends on your career plans. My career plans are complete, I will do this for a few more years or at least until someone has to tell me what day it is.

douglas.dick  
#10 Posted : 17 December 2015 14:34:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
douglas.dick

This is an interesting subject, in my experience employers don't know what the difference is, broadly speaking. You see jobs advertised that requires Diplomas, CMIOSH etc that have a job spec and remuneration package that would not attract someone this qualified. There is similarly employers who look for the cert as the benchmark and have a job spec and remuneration package that should really be for the diploma.

Experience is also a key factor though and no amount of letter after your name can make up for it.
Ian Bell2  
#11 Posted : 17 December 2015 15:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

DOn't be lead astray by this Certificate/IOSH nonsense.

There are lots of areas within safety/safety engineering where technical qualifications are far more important.

In many areas IOSH stuff isn't bothered with or recognised.

I was/am CMIOSH - but not been asked about it for years in the sector I work in.
RayRapp  
#12 Posted : 17 December 2015 19:14:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I have never done the NEBOSH Cert but I believe it is a good course for someone starting out their career. This debate about qualifications v experience has been going on for yonks. There is much more to this industry than just qualifications. I am also aware of comments like he had CMIOSH but was useless. I think there is a perception that those with good qualifications should know everything, which is simply not how it works. There are so many specialist areas of health and safety. Being able to research and learn is far more important.

Ironically I interviewed four candidates today for a specialist role. It was not necessarily the candidate with the most qualifications or experience who got the role. Rightly or wrongly what I was looking for was enthusiasm and the right attitude. Bells and whistles are good but they do not maketh the man.
Roundtuit  
#13 Posted : 17 December 2015 21:02:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Unfortunately a continued evolution of bunkerism - many years ago graduates hired graduates regardless of how relevant the degree was to the working environment (I recalled the graffiti above the toilet roll holder at what was then Preston Polytechnic free sociology degrees... please take one" as I was introduced to my newly appointed manager at my second employment not in social care provision).

These attitudes are unfortunately becoming more pervasive - ISO 9001:2015 placing more emphasis on demonstrable competence by certification (NVQ's etc) rather than the allowance of traditional "grandfather skills" and its associated real world experience.

As with PQQ's having the NEBOSH Certificate certainly ticks the box to pass to the next stage of recruitment but without the relevant industry experience, or the potential to develop within the business in the eyes of the interviewer(s), as with all qualifications gained or claimed it neither guarantees competence nor gains the candidate the position.

Regarding Tech IOSH I seem to recall limitations with the General Certificate being passed within recent time (3 years?) of application.
Roundtuit  
#14 Posted : 17 December 2015 21:02:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Unfortunately a continued evolution of bunkerism - many years ago graduates hired graduates regardless of how relevant the degree was to the working environment (I recalled the graffiti above the toilet roll holder at what was then Preston Polytechnic free sociology degrees... please take one" as I was introduced to my newly appointed manager at my second employment not in social care provision).

These attitudes are unfortunately becoming more pervasive - ISO 9001:2015 placing more emphasis on demonstrable competence by certification (NVQ's etc) rather than the allowance of traditional "grandfather skills" and its associated real world experience.

As with PQQ's having the NEBOSH Certificate certainly ticks the box to pass to the next stage of recruitment but without the relevant industry experience, or the potential to develop within the business in the eyes of the interviewer(s), as with all qualifications gained or claimed it neither guarantees competence nor gains the candidate the position.

Regarding Tech IOSH I seem to recall limitations with the General Certificate being passed within recent time (3 years?) of application.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.